[006]
neoYTPism
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does Lady Tremaine from Cinderella even belong in the CompleteMonster category? Her villainy is quite mild compared to that of other Disney villains on the list; she\'s an abusive step-parent, yes, but [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Frollo]] and [[TheRescuers Medusa]] are far more extreme examples of that same thing. Tremaine made Cinderella do a lot of work, but it wasn\'t as dangerous as the kind of work Medusa made Penny do. (As in, digging for diamonds in frequently-flooded caves)
to:
Does Lady Tremaine from Cinderella even belong in the CompleteMonster category at all? Her villainy is quite mild compared to that of other Disney villains on the list; she\\\'s an abusive step-parent, yes, but [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Frollo]] and [[TheRescuers Medusa]] are far more extreme examples of that same thing. Tremaine made Cinderella do a lot of work, but it wasn\\\'t as dangerous as the kind of work Medusa made Penny do. (As in, digging for diamonds in frequently-flooded caves)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does Lady Tremaine from Cinderella even belong in the CompleteMonster category? Her villainy is fairly mild compared to other Disney villains on the list; she\'s an abusive step-parent, yes, but [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Frollo]] and [[TheRescuers Medusa]] are far more extreme examples of that same thing. Tremaine made Cinderella do a lot of work, but it wasn\'t as dangerous as the kind of work Medusa made Penny do. (As in, digging for diamonds in frequently-flooded caves)
to:
Does Lady Tremaine from Cinderella even belong in the CompleteMonster category? Her villainy is quite mild compared to that of other Disney villains on the list; she\\\'s an abusive step-parent, yes, but [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Frollo]] and [[TheRescuers Medusa]] are far more extreme examples of that same thing. Tremaine made Cinderella do a lot of work, but it wasn\\\'t as dangerous as the kind of work Medusa made Penny do. (As in, digging for diamonds in frequently-flooded caves)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does Lady Tremaine from Cinderella even belong in the CompleteMonster category? Her villainy is fairly mild compared to other Disney villains on the list; she\'s an abusive step-parent, yes, but [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Frollo]] and [[TheRescuers Medusa]] are far more extreme examples of that same thing. Tremaine made Cinderella do a lot of work, but it wasn\'t as dangerous as the kind of work (ie. digging for diamonds in frequently-flooded caves) Medusa made Penny do.
to:
Does Lady Tremaine from Cinderella even belong in the CompleteMonster category? Her villainy is fairly mild compared to other Disney villains on the list; she\\\'s an abusive step-parent, yes, but [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Frollo]] and [[TheRescuers Medusa]] are far more extreme examples of that same thing. Tremaine made Cinderella do a lot of work, but it wasn\\\'t as dangerous as the kind of work Medusa made Penny do. (As in, digging for diamonds in frequently-flooded caves)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does Lady Tremaine from Cinderella even belong in the CompleteMonster category? Her villainy is fairly mild compared to other Disney villains on the list; she\'s an abusive step-parent, yes, but [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Frollo]] and [[TheRescuers Medusa]] are far more extreme examples of the same kind of things. Tremaine made Cinderella do a lot of work, but it wasn\'t as dangerous as the kind of work (ie. digging for diamonds in frequently-flooded caves) Medusa made Penny do.
to:
Does Lady Tremaine from Cinderella even belong in the CompleteMonster category? Her villainy is fairly mild compared to other Disney villains on the list; she\\\'s an abusive step-parent, yes, but [[Disney/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame Frollo]] and [[TheRescuers Medusa]] are far more extreme examples of that same thing. Tremaine made Cinderella do a lot of work, but it wasn\\\'t as dangerous as the kind of work (ie. digging for diamonds in frequently-flooded caves) Medusa made Penny do.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Okay, \
to:
[[quoteblock]]As for \\\"Vampires\\\" that are prolific in Japanese folklore? Yaeh, there\\\'s only two: Shuten-Doji and various Floating Head Monsters.[[/quoteblock]]
Okay, \\\"profilic in Japanese \\\'\\\'\\\'modern\\\'\\\'\\\' fiction\\\".
Let me restate my query this way: Do non-undead creatures/characters who suck blood True Vampire-style (i.e. via biting with fangs) count under OurVampiresAreDifferent?
Okay, \\\"profilic in Japanese \\\'\\\'\\\'modern\\\'\\\'\\\' fiction\\\".
Let me restate my query this way: Do non-undead creatures/characters who suck blood True Vampire-style (i.e. via biting with fangs) count under OurVampiresAreDifferent?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Okay, let me restate my query this way: Do non-undead creatures/characters who suck blood True Vampire-style (i.e. via biting with fangs) count under OurVampiresAreDifferent?
to:
Okay, \\\"profilic in Japanese \\\'\\\'\\\'modern\\\'\\\'\\\' fiction\\\".
Let me restate my query this way: Do non-undead creatures/characters who suck blood True Vampire-style (i.e. via biting with fangs) count under OurVampiresAreDifferent?
Let me restate my query this way: Do non-undead creatures/characters who suck blood True Vampire-style (i.e. via biting with fangs) count under OurVampiresAreDifferent?
