[002]
50.201.133.13
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Can we please look into rewriting the type descriptions? Some are vague and inaccurate. For example, it\'s unfair to say ISFPs \
to:
Can we please look into rewriting the type descriptions? Some are vague and inaccurate. For example, it\\\'s unfair to say ISFPs \\\"don\\\'t like confrontations\\\" when their extroverted sensing functions drives them into conflicts. Characters like Rick Grimes and Luke Skywalker are perfect examples of fictional ISFPs who get themselves into confrontations all the time. ISFPs and INFPs both have the potential to be the most passionate out of all the types because of their introverted feeling function, so saying they prefer a \\\"live and let live\\\" approach is very misleading.
Also, ISFPs are in the Artisan tempermanet, which is well known for their hands-on, action-oriented learning style. So again, saying that they\\\'re laid back is pretty misleading.
Also, ISFPs are in the Artisan tempermanet, which is well known for their hands-on, action-oriented learning style. So again, saying that they\\\'re laid back is pretty misleading.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Can we please look into rewriting the type descriptions? Some are vague and inaccurate. For example, it\'s unfair to say ISFPs \
to:
Can we please look into rewriting the type descriptions? Some are vague and inaccurate. For example, it\\\'s unfair to say ISFPs \\\"don\\\'t like confrontations\\\" when their extroverted sensing functions drives them into conflicts. Characters like Rick Grimes and Luke Skywalker are perfect examples of fictional ISFPs who get themselves into confrontations all the time. ISFPs and INFPs both have the potential to be the most passionate out of all the types because of their introverted feeling function, so saying they prefer a \\\"live and let live\\\" approach is very misleading.
