[002]
Redazrael
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I know you don\'t, and I appreciate your candor. But can you at least see where I\'m coming from now, even if you don\'t agree? You said it yourself: \
to:
I know you don\\\'t, and I appreciate your candor. But can you at least see where I\\\'m coming from now, even if you don\\\'t agree? You said it yourself: \\\"Whites are the majority. One white person dies, it\\\'s a drop in the bucket.\\\"
How horrible a thought process is that? It\\\'s not a big deal that someone dies just because of their race? Isn\\\'t that, you know, \\\'\\\'racist\\\'\\\'? I know you said that you don\\\'t speak for the Internet, but isn\\\'t that what\\\'s really being said here when no one cares that the death toll was \\\'\\\'solely\\\'\\\' white males and no white males survived? The InternetBackdraft would exist if the death toll happened to be the hypothetical scenario I described where the genders/races were different, but \\\'\\\'all\\\'\\\' of the white men and \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' the white men dying isn\\\'t cause for concern because of \\\'\\\'what they are?\\\'\\\' The fact that an entire demographic was killed off and not a single member of any other demographic died doesn\\\'t matter because of what that demographic happened to be?
Again, how is that \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' UnfortunateImplications? And again, can you at least see where I\\\'m coming from now, even if you don\\\'t agree?
A side note to your side note: I do genuinely appreciate the fact that you\\\'d be just as vehemently against it. But others would change their tune. And that\\\'s important.
How horrible a thought process is that? It\\\'s not a big deal that someone dies just because of their race? Isn\\\'t that, you know, \\\'\\\'racist\\\'\\\'? I know you said that you don\\\'t speak for the Internet, but isn\\\'t that what\\\'s really being said here when no one cares that the death toll was \\\'\\\'solely\\\'\\\' white males and no white males survived? The InternetBackdraft would exist if the death toll happened to be the hypothetical scenario I described where the genders/races were different, but \\\'\\\'all\\\'\\\' of the white men and \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' the white men dying isn\\\'t cause for concern because of \\\'\\\'what they are?\\\'\\\' The fact that an entire demographic was killed off and not a single member of any other demographic died doesn\\\'t matter because of what that demographic happened to be?
Again, how is that \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' UnfortunateImplications? And again, can you at least see where I\\\'m coming from now, even if you don\\\'t agree?
A side note to your side note: I do genuinely appreciate the fact that you\\\'d be just as vehemently against it. But others would change their tune. And that\\\'s important.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I know you don\'t, and I appreciate your candor. But can you at least see where I\'m coming from now, even if you don\'t agree? You said it yourself: \
to:
I know you don\\\'t, and I appreciate your candor. But can you at least see where I\\\'m coming from now, even if you don\\\'t agree? You said it yourself: \\\"Whites are the majority. One white person dies, it\\\'s a drop in the bucket.\\\"
How horrible a thought process is that? It\\\'s not a big deal that someone dies just because of their race? Isn\\\'t that, you know, \\\'\\\'racist\\\'\\\'? I know you said that you don\\\'t speak for the Internet, but isn\\\'t that what\\\'s really being said here when no one cares that the death toll was \\\'\\\'solely\\\'\\\' white males and no white males survived? The InternetBackdraft would exist if the death toll happened to be the hypothetical scenario I described where the genders/races were different, but \\\'\\\'all\\\'\\\' of the white men and \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' the white men dying isn\\\'t cause for concern because of \\\'\\\'what they are?\\\'\\\' The fact that an entire demographic was killed off and not a single member of any other demographic died doesn\\\'t matter because of what that demographic happened to be?
Again, how is that \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' UnfortunateImplications? And again, can you at least see where I\\\'m coming from now, even if you don\\\'t agree?
A side note to your side note: I do genuinely appreciate that you\\\'d be just as vehemently against it. But others would change their tune. And that\\\'s important.
How horrible a thought process is that? It\\\'s not a big deal that someone dies just because of their race? Isn\\\'t that, you know, \\\'\\\'racist\\\'\\\'? I know you said that you don\\\'t speak for the Internet, but isn\\\'t that what\\\'s really being said here when no one cares that the death toll was \\\'\\\'solely\\\'\\\' white males and no white males survived? The InternetBackdraft would exist if the death toll happened to be the hypothetical scenario I described where the genders/races were different, but \\\'\\\'all\\\'\\\' of the white men and \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' the white men dying isn\\\'t cause for concern because of \\\'\\\'what they are?\\\'\\\' The fact that an entire demographic was killed off and not a single member of any other demographic died doesn\\\'t matter because of what that demographic happened to be?
Again, how is that \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' UnfortunateImplications? And again, can you at least see where I\\\'m coming from now, even if you don\\\'t agree?
A side note to your side note: I do genuinely appreciate that you\\\'d be just as vehemently against it. But others would change their tune. And that\\\'s important.
