[002]
salvadorfranz
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I second the notion! Let\'s see, ClothingDamage [[spoiler: to save Asia from becoming a nuke]], \'\'talk to breasts as if they have a voice\'\', [[spoiler: \'\'accidentally\'\' summoned the breast god]], and [[spoiler: uses Rias\' breasts as a battery back-up when he\'s drained of energy]].
to:
EDIT: this post is deleted because my computer lagged and accidentally did a double post.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"It seriously wasn\\\'t criminal to break into a private residence?
Nope, though the Queen could have sued him under Tort Law if she\\\'d wanted.\\\"
This is confusing, depending on where you live.
Even though United States law was originally based on British law in part, it long ago parted ways. (Particularly when the Founding Fathers changed what they saw as not working.) The result is, while criminal trespass on private property has been at least a misdemeanor in the US for a long time, it wasn\\\'t so much in Britain until the law was changed, as mentioned in the entry.
It gets even more interesting around the world. Googling where trespass is criminal vs civil is... enlightening.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trespass_to_land
http://indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=criminal%20trespass
...and so on.
Nope, though the Queen could have sued him under Tort Law if she\\\'d wanted.\\\"
This is confusing, depending on where you live.
Even though United States law was originally based on British law in part, it long ago parted ways. (Particularly when the Founding Fathers changed what they saw as not working.) The result is, while criminal trespass on private property has been at least a misdemeanor in the US for a long time, it wasn\\\'t so much in Britain until the law was changed, as mentioned in the entry.
It gets even more interesting around the world. Googling where trespass is criminal vs civil is... enlightening.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trespass_to_land
http://indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=criminal%20trespass
...and so on.
