[004]
VVK
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Too much of a distance in time for the trope as per its description. The thing she criticises would have to be one she does right after saying or one that\'s a notable part of her normal characterisation. This is a single instance that doesn\'t come right after, so it\'s neither. (Also, though people keep doing it, that\'s not the way to use a second bullet point. It\'s for something like sub-examples, not more detail or \
to:
Too much of a distance in time for the trope as per its description. The thing she criticises would either have to be one she does right after saying that, or one that\\\'s a notable part of her normal characterisation. This is a single instance that doesn\\\'t come right after, so it\\\'s neither. (Also, though people keep doing it, that\\\'s not the way to use a second bullet point. It\\\'s for something like sub-examples, not more detail or \\\"replies\\\" to the original.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Too much of a distance in time for the trope as per its description. (Also, though people keep doing it, that\'s not the way to use a second bullet point. It\'s for something like sub-examples, not more detail or \
to:
Too much of a distance in time for the trope as per its description. The thing she criticises would have to be one she does right after saying or one that\\\'s a notable part of her normal characterisation. This is a single instance that doesn\\\'t come right after, so it\\\'s neither. (Also, though people keep doing it, that\\\'s not the way to use a second bullet point. It\\\'s for something like sub-examples, not more detail or \\\"replies\\\" to the original.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Too much of a distance in time for the trope as per its description. (Also, though people keep doing it, that\'s not the way to sue a second bullet point. It\'s for something like sub-examples.)
to:
Too much of a distance in time for the trope as per its description. (Also, though people keep doing it, that\\\'s not the way to use a second bullet point. It\\\'s for something like sub-examples, not more detail or \\\"replies\\\" to the original.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Too much of a distance in time for the trope.
to:
Too much of a distance in time for the trope as per its description. (Also, though people keep doing it, that\\\'s not the way to sue a second bullet point. It\\\'s for something like sub-examples.)
