[001]
GeorgeTSLC
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
*Additional defense for \
to:
REVISED Defense for \\\"The Brown Bunny\\\" (Disclosure: I have not seen the movie nor want to)
There is only that explicit scene, and it\\\'s brief. Based from external sources, the act was also consensual among both actors (although still controversial). Sources, including TheOtherWiki, show that the \\\"work is mainstream and can be discussed in polite company\\\". As made clear in the Tropes article, a significant part of that discussion will be condemnation of the one highly explicit scene. But if a porn consumer needs to sit through an hour and half of non-porn for a payoff, he\\\'s gonna want his money back. On balance, the work, taken as a whole (per the US Supreme Court) cannot be considered pornography.
There is only that explicit scene, and it\\\'s brief. Based from external sources, the act was also consensual among both actors (although still controversial). Sources, including TheOtherWiki, show that the \\\"work is mainstream and can be discussed in polite company\\\". As made clear in the Tropes article, a significant part of that discussion will be condemnation of the one highly explicit scene. But if a porn consumer needs to sit through an hour and half of non-porn for a payoff, he\\\'s gonna want his money back. On balance, the work, taken as a whole (per the US Supreme Court) cannot be considered pornography.
