[001]
flocculentCamelidae
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Insisting on answering a clearly rhetorical question basically amounts to vandalism. Calling out other tropers on the main page is explicitly natter. Rhetorical tools you don\'t agree with don\'t warrant vandalism \'\'or\'\' natter, they warrant discussion and repair, when difficult to understand.
to:
Insisting on answering a clearly rhetorical question basically amounts to vandalism. Calling out other tropers on the main page is explicitly natter. Rhetorical tools you don\\\'t agree with don\\\'t warrant vandalism \\\'\\\'or\\\'\\\' natter, they warrant discussion and repair, when difficult to understand. If it doesn\\\'t demean the writing voice of the wiki, and it helps convey the correct idea, your own personal crusade against rhetorical questions should not corrupt the phrases in question.
