[005]
Nezumi
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Could someone please explain to me how \'\'RatchetAndClank\'\' objectively doesn\'t meet the definition of CrapsackWorld as provided on that trope\'s page? I admit I\'ve only played part of the first game... but I can\'t find a spot there where it \'\'doesn\'t\'\' match up. Its universe is a pretty awful place where the greedy and wicked thrive, senseless violence is the order of the day, and it\'s only begun to get better because of the title duo\'s actions, pruning off the wickedness. There may be something I\'m missing, but the only explanation I\'ve ever heard is that it was \
to:
Could someone please explain to me how \\\'\\\'RatchetAndClank\\\'\\\' objectively doesn\\\'t meet the definition of CrapsackWorld as provided on that trope\\\'s page? I admit I\\\'ve only played part of the first game... but I can\\\'t find a spot there where it \\\'\\\'doesn\\\'t\\\'\\\' match up. Its universe is a pretty awful place where the greedy and wicked thrive, senseless violence is the order of the day, and it\\\'s only begun to get better because of the title duo\\\'s actions, pruning off the wickedness. There may be something I\\\'m missing, but the only explanation I\\\'ve ever heard is that it was \\\"Comedic\\\" or \\\"Played for Laughs\\\"... which is allowed for in the trope. There are other comedic examples of Crapsack World that are untouched, as well, like \\\'\\\'DestroyAllHumans\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'{{Overlord}}\\\'\\\'. I\\\'m tempted to reinstate it, but maybe I am in the wrong here... and even if I\\\'m not, we need to do something or it will just end up an Edit War.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Could someone please explain to me how \'\'RatchetAndClank\'\' objectively doesn\'t meet the definition of \
to:
Could someone please explain to me how \\\'\\\'RatchetAndClank\\\'\\\' objectively doesn\\\'t meet the definition of CrapsackWorld as provided on that trope\\\'s page? I admit I\\\'ve only played part of the first game... but I can\\\'t find a spot there where it \\\'\\\'doesn\\\'t\\\'\\\' match up. Its universe is a pretty awful place where the greedy and wicked thrive, senseless violence is the order of the day, and it\\\'s only begun to get better because of the title duo\\\'s actions, pruning off the wickedness. There may be something I\\\'m missing, but the only explanation I\\\'ve ever heard is that it was \\\"Comedic\\\" or \\\"Played for Laughs\\\"... which is allowed for in the trope. There are other comedic examples of Crapsack World that are untouched, as well, like \\\'\\\'DestroyAllHumans\\\'\\\' or \\\'\\\'{{Overlord}}\\\'\\\'. I\\\'m tempted to reinstate it, but maybe I am in the wrong here... and even if I\\\'m not, we need to do something or it will just end up an Edit War.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
No shit I always nitpick on the irate gamer, WHEN I SAID SHRIS AND JENNY BROKE UP, i WAS lying. HE AND JENNIFER ARE MARRIED and having children
to:
No shit I always nitpick on the irate gamer, when I said chris and jenny broke up, I was lying. he and jennifer are married and having children
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
No shit i ALWAYS NITPICK ON THE IRATE GAMER, WHEN I SAID SHRIS AND JENNY BROKE UP, i WAS lying. HE AND JENNIFER ARE MARRIED
to:
No shit I always nitpick on the irate gamer, WHEN I SAID SHRIS AND JENNY BROKE UP, i WAS lying. HE AND JENNIFER ARE MARRIED and having children
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
1. If Eric isn\'t allowed to play, who was player 2 in the Contra videos?
2. Bores and Jennifer broke up.
3. Who are you?
2. Bores and Jennifer broke up.
3. Who are you?
to:
No shit i ALWAYS NITPICK ON THE IRATE GAMER, WHEN I SAID SHRIS AND JENNY BROKE UP, i WAS lying. HE AND JENNIFER ARE MARRIED
