[001]
boldingd
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As to your suggestion, you may actually have it backward: if your story has FTL drives, it\'s more realistic, not less, for it to include time travel also (or at least to address the question). So maybe 3 being \
to:
As to your suggestion, you may actually have it backward: if your story has FTL drives, it\\\'s more realistic, not less, for it to include time travel also (or at least to address the question). So maybe 3 being \\\"hand-waved and/or causality-mainting FTL drives\\\", and 4 being \\\"relativity/simultanaity-questions-addressed FTL drives\\\"?
Edit: @Girlyboy, I read your comment in detail only after I posted mine, and I think you and I are saying pretty much the same thing. \\\"FTL with time-travel\\\" and \\\"FTL without time-travel\\\" may be a usable ranking system, but it goes in the reverse of what the OP was thinking (FTL with time-travel is \\\'\\\'more\\\'\\\' realistic). Correct?
Edit: @Girlyboy, I read your comment in detail only after I posted mine, and I think you and I are saying pretty much the same thing. \\\"FTL with time-travel\\\" and \\\"FTL without time-travel\\\" may be a usable ranking system, but it goes in the reverse of what the OP was thinking (FTL with time-travel is \\\'\\\'more\\\'\\\' realistic). Correct?
