Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Characters / SlayThePrincess

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don\'t really see this being an issue at this point, but there really is no argument for the protagonist being anything other than a \
to:
I don\\\'t really see this being an issue at this point, but there really is no argument for the protagonist being anything other than a \\\"he\\\" (or \\\"you\\\" when referring to the literal player.) He is referred to as a he both in game and by the developers, and the argument of him not being a \\\"he\\\" because of being the Long Quiet doesn\\\'t make much sense when considering that, like the shifting mound, even as the Long Quiet he is still a sapient \\\"person\\\", and even after the reveal of the Princess as the Shifting Mound the Narrator/Creator still refers to her using she/her. I would even argue that having \\\"Ambiguous Gender\\\" listed as a trope for the Player isn\\\'t really correct.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don\'t really see this being an issue at this point, but there really is no argument for the protagonist being anything other than a \
to:
I don\\\'t really see this being an issue at this point, but there really is no argument for the protagonist being anything other than a \\\"he\\\" (or \\\"you\\\" when referring to the literal player.) He is referred to as a he both in game and by the developers, and the argument of him not being a \\\"he\\\" because of being the Long Quiet doesn\\\'t make much sense when considering that ,like the shifting mound, even as the Long Quiet he is still a sapient \\\"person\\\", and even after the reveal of the Princess as the Shifting Mound the Narrator/Creator still refers to her using she/her. I would even argue that having \\\"Ambiguous Gender\\\" listed as a trope for the Player isn\\\'t really correct.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Back in 2019, I had deleted all WeaponOfChoice entries because they\'re misuse and literally read as \
to:
Back in 2019, I had deleted all WeaponOfChoice entries because they\\\'re misuse and literally read as \\\"This character pilots [X]\\\" without any additional meaning to it. The tropers who added/re-added them in the following years ([=KoBB=] and [=LordKaarvani=]) are liable for not following guidelines in Administrivia/ZeroContextExample.
Top