[002]
Tuvok
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
An Example for President Evil was added - \\\"Robert Redford is, willingly or not, an accomplice to Adrian Veidt\\\'s crimes\\\"
I originally removed the earlier example because the President Evil example states as actively being evil. Has been re-added but labels him an accomplice. The main factor is that Redford was not an accomplice to the crime, he covered it up AFTER the fact. Also he was forced to cover up the crime due to the geo-political delicate situation of the time. Supplements even indicate that he stayed away from Veldt after he found out what he did. That being said is that enough to label him as an example of President Evil?
I originally removed the earlier example because the President Evil example states as actively being evil. Has been re-added but labels him an accomplice. The main factor is that Redford was not an accomplice to the crime, he covered it up AFTER the fact. Also he was forced to cover up the crime due to the geo-political delicate situation of the time. Supplements even indicate that he stayed away from Veldt after he found out what he did. That being said is that enough to label him as an example of President Evil?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"Robert Redford is, willingly or not, an accomplice to Adrian Veidt\\\'s crimes\\\"
I originally removed the example because the President Evil example states as actively being evil. Has been re-added but labels him an accomplice. The main factor is that Redford was not an accomplice to the crime, he covered it up AFTER the fact. Also he was forced to cover up the crime due to the geo-political delicate situation of the time. Supplements even indicate that he stayed away from Veldt after he found out what he did. That being said is that enough to label him as an example of President Evil?
I originally removed the example because the President Evil example states as actively being evil. Has been re-added but labels him an accomplice. The main factor is that Redford was not an accomplice to the crime, he covered it up AFTER the fact. Also he was forced to cover up the crime due to the geo-political delicate situation of the time. Supplements even indicate that he stayed away from Veldt after he found out what he did. That being said is that enough to label him as an example of President Evil?
