[001]
Daefaroth
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I pm'd [=RyCyber=] to invite them to this discussion. Hopefully the issue can be resolved. I haven't seen the work so I don't know if the trope applies or not, but I have two notes to add that will hopefully focus things:
1) In one of [=RyCyber's=] edit reasons they say
1) In one of [=RyCyber's=] edit reasons they say
to:
I pm\'d [=RyCyber=] to invite them to this discussion. Hopefully the issue can be resolved. I haven\'t seen the work so I don\'t know if the trope applies or not, but I have two notes to add that will hopefully focus things:
1) In one of [=RyCyber\'s=] edit reasons they say \"Does it really make sense to include the double meaning title trope since it doppelgangers given how it\'s defined on this site and how the term has been used to refer to alternate versions of main characters in this franchise\". This isn\'t the only way double meaning title can be used. If it is a valid reference to an outside work or the dictionary definition then it works. {{Doppelganger}} the trope isn\'t required.
2) When makarovak47 readded the trope the first time the edit reason was \"I should have used a much better explanation.\" and the trope was readded with virtually the same wording. When they readded the trope a second time the edit reason was \"I already gave an explanation why I re-added this yesterday.\" ... No, you didn\'t. You gave no further explanation or justification for why you feel the trope is valid.
So, good luck and I hope you can get it figured out.
1) In one of [=RyCyber\'s=] edit reasons they say \"Does it really make sense to include the double meaning title trope since it doppelgangers given how it\'s defined on this site and how the term has been used to refer to alternate versions of main characters in this franchise\". This isn\'t the only way double meaning title can be used. If it is a valid reference to an outside work or the dictionary definition then it works. {{Doppelganger}} the trope isn\'t required.
2) When makarovak47 readded the trope the first time the edit reason was \"I should have used a much better explanation.\" and the trope was readded with virtually the same wording. When they readded the trope a second time the edit reason was \"I already gave an explanation why I re-added this yesterday.\" ... No, you didn\'t. You gave no further explanation or justification for why you feel the trope is valid.
So, good luck and I hope you can get it figured out.
