Reviews: The Belgariad

Strong Series

In the book, The Rivan Codex, David Eddings all but admits he's following a generic plot structure. The books, are, of course, quite generic. But that doesn't stop them from being absolutely awesome.

The real strength of both The Belgariad and The Malloreon lies in their characters. When everything else feels incredibly cliched, the characters still come across as real and sympathetic, three-dimensional and well-constructed. Of course the books are extremely plot-driven, but the characters, from Garion to Ce'Nedra to Silk to Zakath, can at times almost make you believe that the books are character-driven, and that's a real accomplishment.

All in all, Eddings has done some very good work with all of these books. No, he's not the next Tolkien, but who on Earth wants to be the "next" anything? It's better to be remembered for yourself rather than aping someone else's style.


Fans are going to hate me for this.

The Belgariad/Malloreon is a Crapsaccharine Series. It starts off looking like a great fantasy epic, and then you reread it and catch all the bits you missed. Most of these bits lie with the characters. My chief complaint can be summed up as 'They pulled this kind of shit, and they're the good guys? We're supposed to support *them?*' Want some examples? Sure thing!
  • Barak raped his wife. But of course it turns out fine, because she becomes a much better person and sees the error of her ways and their marriage becomes better and- NO. I don't give a fuck what happens as the result, rape is still rape.
  • Zakath tried to commit genocide. Did he repent? Yes. Does it make a difference? No. I don't give a damn how sorry he was, try telling that to all those Murgos he had killed for no other reason than that they were Murgos.
  • Polgara is supposedly a warm, motherly character, when in reality she's a massive bitch. I personally would not allow her to care for a child, because she raised Garion to be completely dependent on her and didn't prepare him for any kind of responsibility, even when she knew his destiny, and refused to answer any of his questions, even the harmless ones. Her smug superiority makes her almost totally unlikable.
  • Ce'Nedra. Apart from her managing to pull a fast one and bring in the Western Armies, her entire contribution is to be a bitchy, whiny, useless, hypocritical lump. If she was supposed to be some kind of strong female role model, that went epically wrong.
  • Sadi. Likable? Oh, sure. Good? Hey, remember all those people he poisoned? And all the drugs he was handing out like candy?
  • Silk: Likable? Absolutely. Good? Yeah, remember how he killed all those Honeths for no other reason than that they happened to be related to a family who killed someone he liked? There's a difference between 'make an example of the murderers' and 'wipe out the whole family', dude.
  • Zedar gets encased in rock forever. His crime was doing exactly what the prophecy said he would do. He killed Durnik in self defense. Does Belgarath care? No, of course not. He's a hero, he can do no wrong. Drunken lecherous pervert.

I cannot like this series any more. The Protagonist Centered Morality angers me so much that I can't read any of the books. It's like trying to eat something you're allergic to without a reaction. I give up.

Generic but Awesome fantasy.

You know how on this series' page, it states that if you've never picked up a book, played a game of D&D, blah blah blah you're probably itching to get your hands on this series? I hadn't done much serious fantasy reading when I first started reading these books. That made them awesome. I hadn't been exposed to the fact that the books were packed with cliches and formulaic storytelling. So I thought they were the best things since sliced bread. And you know what? I still think they're awesome.

David Eddings knew that he wasn't going to become the next Tolkien when he sat down to write this story. He did it with the intent of publishing it and making a lot of money. Hence the tone of the book, which so delights and abounds in snarky language and clever banter that it quite frequently lampshades its own use of wit. He mined real-world cultures and stereotypes to populate his fantasy world, and added a generic magic system and a dash of assorted D&D monsters. Not a great deal of effort, I imagine. However, what he did put a lot of effort into was the characters, particularly Garion, Belgarath, and Polgara, and the dialogue as I mentioned before.

To sum up, this series contains a generic plot, completely formulaic worldbuilding, and is cliched in just about every way you can imagine except where it counts. The dialouge is wonderfully witty and fun to read time and again, and the characters are awesome. They range in scale from stuckup princess to the honest blacksmith to pure Bad Ass, but they're all individuals and complex. So go read these books, and buy them for your kids so that they can get all the cliches packed into condensed format before they realize that they're cliches.

An Excellent Fantasy

The Belgariad is, in a word, triumphant. It’s awesome. It’s jaw-dropping. It’s an amazing fantasy series. What's strange is that you won't start out thinking that way. The plot seems generic fantasy and not worth your time; and honestly, you won't read this series for plot. You'll read it for the characters and their dialogue.

Eddings is a fantastic character writer who fleshes out each and every one of his creations: the protagonists, the antagonists, the secondary protagonists, the minor characters, the one-off people...they all have amazing depth and a definite flair to their character that makes each one seem truly individual.

Eddings uses a lot of tropes and cliches in his writing and spins them upside down by putting his own unique twist on them. He is shockingly self-aware, and lampshades just about everything possible in his writing. He manages to take fantasy cliches such as "runaway princess" or "almighty ancient wizard" or "haughty sorceress" and make them so wholly his own that you forget that his characters technically conform to an archetype.

What really gets me about The Belgariad is the banter. Everyone who reads the series remembers the banter. Every character has snarker elements to them, and the party engages in constant back-and-forth dialogue that will entertain the reader through all the books. Even the characters who are stoic or otherwise unfunny have their moments, often acting as straight men to the more snarky members of the team. Eddings' ability to constantly keep his dialogue fresh and entertaining through all his novels is a marvel.

The sequel series, The Mallorean, is—as noted above—“more of the same”. But here, “the same” is a good thing. The characterization and dialogue is as excellent as before, but better yet, The Mallorean is where Eddings shows off his worldbuilding abilities best. While The Belgariad had plenty of Fantasy Counterpart Cultures, here he takes the formerly Always Chaotic Evil races of his previous series and creates from them interesting and intriguing societies.

The books’ weakness is their plot. If you read Eddings for story, you’ll be disappointed. He didn’t write to tell a unique story; he wrote to make interesting characters with witty and self-aware dialogue, and in this respect, he doesn’t disappoint.