What's Happening

Troperville

Tools

collapse/expand topics back to Main/ReligionIsMagic

lu127
moderator
topic
01:39:33 AM Nov 9th 2012
mezimm
topic
11:28:24 PM Mar 21st 2012
The article misrepresents Christianity when it says "tell a Christian in the US Southeast that people can't resurrect themselves or magically duplicate food and they will look shocked and probably never speak to you again." No one believes Jesus "resurrected Himself", or that the feeding of 5,000+ was "magical": they were miracles, not magic. Miracles have an important distinction in that they are products of divine intervention - they came from God rather than from any source in the observable universe, as "magic" would indicate. It also seems to be a pot shot at Christianity by drawing a distinction between the reasonable Buddhist and the stereotypical Christian of the deep South. There has to be a better way to phrase this.
SaltyWaffles
06:20:06 PM Jul 13th 2012
edited by SaltyWaffles
...I fail to see the difference between divine miracles and magic. See Deus ex Machina, A Wizard Did It, the fact that Magic A Is Magic A is a trope (one often averted/subverted, at that) and not a given constant, and that trope (can't remember the exact name...Divine Magic, or something?) that's all about magic coming from the gods/deities of the setting.

Oh, and there is also no distinction between magic "coming from God and magic coming from a force in the observable universe". If it comes from a god of any kind, then it comes from a force in the observable universe. If it is not part of the observable universe, then it does not really exist, no matter what your setting. Something being inherently unobservable by anyone/anything has a very hard time creating observable effects, especially on the "random, highly specific miracle in a tiny spot on a planet out of hundreds of trillions spread out over uncountable lightyears".
phasmid
topic
06:46:03 PM Aug 12th 2011
I'm having a heard time figuring out what exactly this trope is describing: a.) Religions which give people magic powers, b.) An outsider's conception that a specific religion is using magic (ie. trying to manipulate the elements of the universe through supernatural media) whether it does anything or not, or c.) Something different altogether.

I would suggest if it is (a) removing all examples that don't feature observed supernatural powers, while if it is (b) removing examples that do. Or possibly splitting the trope in two (if there is not one suitable for those examples to be moved to).
AwesomeFerret
06:22:52 AM Jan 28th 2012
edited by AwesomeFerret
I believe the trope is referring to powers that being an upper member of a religion is supposed to or once believed to give, when refering to real life examples, and when dealing with fiction what powers it actually does give. For example, in the Dragon Quest games preists have healing powers. This isn't a rumour or a superstition, it is a fact of these games. Real life priests are supposedly able to excorcise spirits. This isn't considered fact, just a "magical" attribute assigned to them. The trope applies differently to real life than it does to fiction, so confusion is understandable.
back to Main/ReligionIsMagic

TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy