Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / ReactionaryFantasy

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 21st 2021 at 9:24:37 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Misused, started by DCC on Mar 17th 2015 at 10:33:09 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 10:29:35 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Misused, started by DCC on May 17th 2014 at 12:26:55 AM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 9:42:24 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Complaining, started by DimensionalShambler on Oct 8th 2016 at 10:40:47 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
fearlessnikki Since: Feb, 2015
Apr 22nd 2016 at 11:07:49 AM •••

Anyone else think this should become a YMMV trope? A lot of the examples come across as subjective to me.

RatherRandomRachel [[blue: "Just as planned."]] Since: Sep, 2013
[[blue: "Just as planned."]]
Sep 10th 2015 at 12:38:23 PM •••

Would a work count as this if it's trying to show a particular reactionary alternate history and intends to explore it? Say for example it shows the Axis as having won World War II, and throws the world into a particular fascist alternate timeline, and how the world develops from there?

"Did you expect somebody else?"
IndirectActiveTransport Since: Nov, 2010
May 4th 2015 at 9:45:17 AM •••

I'll be amending the pro wrestling section soon. You really don't realize how aggravating on an intellectual level it is to read the words "wrestling in general", much less "women's wrestling in general" and then get lectured on WWE. Not the CWC, the (W)WWF, not even OVW, just WWE with a token TNA mention, as if that paints an accurate picture of an industry lasting at least 130 years stretching from what is now the UK to the Republic of Congo to Canada to Chile.

The fact this wiki hasn't even provided a decent page for a promotion like AJW makes me think it should be disqualified from the subject of "women's wrestling" until that is rectified. I don't know that 130 year international history inside and out, I don't even know a whole lot about Zenjo. I don't feel especially qualified to write entries pertaining to the history of the wrestling business, even when limited to "women's" wrestling, so I'm not insinuating I can give the most accurate picture by myself but I think we as a whole can do better.

Evulzboy Since: Mar, 2011
Aug 29th 2012 at 5:41:53 AM •••

We should attempt to make something off this breathing craze.

You Are Not Alone...Until I Find You. Hide / Show Replies
IndirectActiveTransport Since: Nov, 2010
May 4th 2015 at 9:22:50 AM •••

Breathing's a recent trend? Isn't it going four billion years strong?

Top