Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Film / CasinoRoyale

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Jan 31st 2013 at 10:36:20 AM •••

This item is being edit warred over. Please sort it out here instead of edit warring.

The one where Bond gets his killing license and plays poker with the Big Bad.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman Hide / Show Replies
tsstevens Since: Oct, 2010
Feb 4th 2013 at 1:42:17 PM •••

The site owner himself has discussed The One With and said they should stay. Please leave them alone.

Currently reading up My Rule Fu Is Stronger than Yours
Westrim deep in though- ow! Since: Jan, 2001
deep in though- ow!
Jan 31st 2013 at 12:15:57 AM •••

Posting here instead of continuing what is now an edit war. The only reason that Bond being blond is significant is that people threw a hissy fit when Craig was announced as the new Bond, continuing up to the release of the movie when the movie and his performance negated their expectations of destruction. It says nothing about the movie, and the fact that you don't know about it, dakinebrah, strongly backs its irrelevance as a descriptor.

Edited by Westrim I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze. Hide / Show Replies
dakinebrah Since: Jan, 2013
Feb 1st 2013 at 11:10:54 PM •••

The "it is irrelevant" bit sure is irrelevant. If you're edgy about a minor description in the film, take it up with the mods.

This discussion is obsolete, anyway. The new description is better.

Edited by dakinebrah
Westrim Since: Jan, 2001
Feb 2nd 2013 at 12:41:29 AM •••

You asked what the controversy was, I explained what the controversy was and pointed out that it was a bad symbol of the movie as indicated by it's lack of relation to anything about the movie itself and your lack of recognition. That's all. Why would I go to a moderator to explain a bit of movie trivia?

As for the new description, I disagree, I don't like the wording 'coming back'. The only movie it would describe is Goldeneye, since the previous movie nearly killed the franchise. Between Die Another Day and this one, all that happened was a reboot, not a come back. That's probably the best description- a straight 'The One With the Continuity Reboot', not different text linked to Continuity Reboot. Is that agreeable?

Edited by Westrim I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.
Westrim Since: Jan, 2001
Feb 2nd 2013 at 12:41:29 AM •••

You asked what the controversy was, I explained what the controversy was and pointed out that it was a bad symbol of the movie as indicated by it's lack of relation to anything about the movie itself and your lack of recognition. That's all. Why would I go to a moderator to explain a bit of movie trivia?

As for the new description, I disagree, I don't like the wording 'coming back'. The only movie it would describe is Goldeneye, since the previous movie nearly killed the franchise. Between Die Another Day and this one, all that happened was a reboot, not a come back. That's probably the best description- a straight 'The One With the Continuity Reboot', not different text linked to Continuity Reboot. Is that agreeable?

Edited by Westrim I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.
Westrim Since: Jan, 2001
Feb 2nd 2013 at 1:24:08 AM •••

Cool.

I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.
Westrim Since: Jan, 2001
Feb 2nd 2013 at 1:24:08 AM •••

Cool.

I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.
MarkLungo Grand Poobah of Crimestrikers Since: Jan, 2010
Grand Poobah of Crimestrikers
May 29th 2012 at 12:19:15 PM •••

I think the 1967 film should be split off into its own article.

"But... nobody told me I needed a signature!" Hide / Show Replies
Top