Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
ChrisX
Since: Jan, 2001
20th May, 2017 08:26:13 PM
You know, he has dropped a discussion topic in the Discussion page.
You can go visit there and iron out your differences.
SeptimusHeap
MOD
(Edited uphill both ways)
21st May, 2017 12:40:31 AM
We have two discussions on this already, so closing this one.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
There seems to be a disagreement taking place in the Injustice 2 YMMV faction where a troper is continuously deleting entries that are expressing dissatisfaction with the story of the game. While this troper, going by the handle Known Unknown, claims to be open to discussion and reason, the troper is demonstrably unwilling to compromise on his stance and has construed matters of interpretation of those he disagrees with as facts, of which his viewpoint is the only valid one. The troper in particular seems especially defensive in regards to YMMV responses from the fandom that are not sympathetic to Batman's portrayal in the game, and while fact checking was necessary for a number of the entries, his actions come off as egregious considering that a number of his justifications are up to interpretation as well (i.e. Superman having planned all along to use the Brainiac mothership to sieze control, while the character gave no indication of such intent until after realising some cities remained digitised).
I suggest that some manner of lock be held in place until after the matter is resolved, and all parties involved are willing to communicate in a rational matter and agree on what areas both sides of the argument need to compromise on.