Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Funny moments do not have to be intentional. Narm is more about something coming off as uncomfortable or awkward, not necessarily unintentionally funny.
The Narm page does, in fact, specifically state that the audience perceives it as funny when it is not meant to be. That said, there is absolutely no reason at all why a bit of narm can't or shouldn't be listed on the Funny Moments page. The OP is implying a mutual exclusivity that simply does not exist. The only requirement for putting an example on the Funny Moments page is that the troper doing so find the example funny (and not be the creator of the work).
Bigotry in the name of inclusion is still bigotry.
Way I see it, it's the difference between "laughable" and "funny."
Something can be narm and it turns the dramatic scene to humorous... But that doesn't mean that humor is a crowning moment of funny any more than every single intentional joke is.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
But there's no reason it can't be. Besides, they're not officially called Crowning Moments anymore, just Moments.
Bigotry in the name of inclusion is still bigotry.
Just to be clear, I'm agreeing with you.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
OK, thanks for the clarification.
Bigotry in the name of inclusion is still bigotry.
The Room is trying to be a drama so most of the humor is unintentional. I think changing it to Narm: The Room might be more better.