Follow TV Tropes

Following

Casting Gag/Actor Allusion and rampant decay and misuse

Go To

MurlocAggroB from the second-most ridiculous province of Canada Since: May, 2015
#1: Apr 21st 2024 at 1:43:27 PM

Casting Gag and Actor Allusion have to be two of my least favourite tropes on the site. Conceptually, they're fine. The former is when an actor is hired for a role that pays homage to a previous role they had, while the latter is when an actor isn't hired for a previous role specifically but the work still nods to that role.

But oh my god they are so horrifically misused. They've both devolved rampantly, to the point where rather than listing actual nods intended by the work they've become dumping grounds for people to draw any comparison between two characters played by the same actor. It's especially bad on character pages. The number of times I've seen this exact wording template:

  • Casting Gag: This isn't the first time [actor name] has [list of vaguely similar traits/actions that another character they played did].

It makes my blood boil.

The problem here is the lack of burden of proof. Like, take this one that was added to Eda's character folder for The Owl House recently:

Like, maybe Wendie Malick was cast as Eda because she played an owl in some show at some point before. Probably not, but I can't disprove it. It's really hard to prove a negative, which opens the floodgate for people to use these tropes to just make Pepe Silvia-tier random connections.

Also sidenote, but this one definitely should a Casting Gag rather than an Actor Allusion if it were valid. There's a secondary issue with the two being used interchangeably when they're actually pretty distinct.

I don't know if this is a TRS problem because I do think the core idea of these tropes are valid, but their current usage is a problem. My question is, are there any requirements to open a Long-Term Projects thread for these two tropes? 'Cause, I would really like to spearhead a cleanup.

jandn2014 Very Spooky from somewhere in Connecticut Since: Aug, 2017 Relationship Status: Hiding
Very Spooky
#2: Apr 21st 2024 at 4:30:01 PM

I'd definitely be up for a cleanup, though both probably need TRS at some point or another (the classic solution of "dumping a lot of the current stuff on Sugar" as its own thing seems viable).

The misuse absolutely reminds me of bad Hilarious in Hindsight entries, especially with the "this isn't the first time"-esque phrasing. You'd think people on TV Tropes would be less surprised that certain thematic and storytelling aspects tend to appear concurrently a lot.

back lol
StarSword Captain of USS Bajor from somewhere in deep space Since: Sep, 2011
Captain of USS Bajor
#3: Apr 21st 2024 at 6:12:37 PM

I'm kind of wondering where OP thinks the tipping point to "yeah, this was probably deliberate" ought to be with Casting Gag, absent Word of God confirmation.

SharkToast Since: Mar, 2013
#4: Apr 21st 2024 at 6:18:31 PM

A lot of these examples could be moved to Typecasting.

MurlocAggroB from the second-most ridiculous province of Canada Since: May, 2015
#5: Apr 21st 2024 at 8:17:13 PM

[up] Maybe some of them, but a lot don't work with typecasting either. Typecasting is when an actor does the same type of role over and over. A lot of bad Actor Allusion and Casting Gag entries are like "Character A and Character B played by the same actor both fought a lightning guy once" (just making up a random example).

[up][up] I don't know for sure, and I think it really changes case-by-case. That's why I want to go the cleanup/maintenance thread route, so people who are familiar with a given series can discuss the problems with specific entries.

Even if you aren't familiar with both works being referenced, if you know at least one then it's usually pretty obvious when something is being taken out of context or having details severely warped so it kinda looks like something else.

StarSword Captain of USS Bajor from somewhere in deep space Since: Sep, 2011
Captain of USS Bajor
#6: Apr 21st 2024 at 8:47:33 PM

[up]Ok, so let me throw one at you that I wrote, for the sake of comparison:

The Hōchū Ōtsuka one is probably pushing it, but the other two were at least noticed by more people than just me (the Satoshi Hino casting I got from a Crunchyroll comment, not having watched Demon Slayer).

MurlocAggroB from the second-most ridiculous province of Canada Since: May, 2015
#7: Apr 21st 2024 at 9:02:52 PM

[up] The first one does not sound like an example. The second also doesn't really sound like one either, but I'm not 100% sure with that. The third one is probably Ink-Suit Actor.

To me, an Actor Allusion/Casting Gag is something that only makes sense if it's that specific actor doing it. Otherwise it's just a coincidence. One example I can think of is in Last Man Standing, where an episode had Tim Allen's character comment that a kid's Buzz Lightyear costume had its wings on upside-down. That joke only makes sense because Tim Allen voiced Buzz Lightyear. That's the kind of thing this trope should be used for.

This is not a YMMV trope. It can't just be something that "people noticed", it has to be deliberate. Undeniably deliberate.

kundoo Since: Sep, 2010
#8: Apr 21st 2024 at 10:28:42 PM

I was thinking, shouldn't both tropes be trivia instead, is they are about behind-the-scene decisions? Or at the very least Casting Gag?

Also, turns out, both tropes are on Tropes Needing TRS

SoyValdo7 I mainly fix indentation issues from La tierra de lagos y volcanes Since: Sep, 2022 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
I mainly fix indentation issues
#9: Apr 21st 2024 at 11:28:27 PM

[up] I swear that Actor Allusion used to be Trivia, and one day, out of nowhere it was changed. If not, then why does it appear almost exclusively on the Trivia subpage?

I'm trying to find some proof that I'm not crazy in the Repair Shop Morgue, but nothing pops up. What I did find was a wick check for the trope dating back to 2021, but it seems it was never used.

Edited by SoyValdo7 on Apr 21st 2024 at 12:34:19 PM

Valdo
EmeraldSource Since: Jan, 2021
#10: Apr 21st 2024 at 11:54:07 PM

The problem with both comes from nitpicky troping habits that dilutes the intentions behind the tropes, and both are basically interchangeable in how they are being used. Celebrity Paradox suffers from pretty much the same thing. I would say that Meta Casting is a comparable trope that is nonetheless significantly healthier because the emphasis is on how it impacts the narrative of the work.

Ideally:

  • Actor Allusion: When a story beat takes a moment to hint at the history of a specific actor, often writing it into the script after the actor is cast. Example is a doctor in a medical drama revealed to have participated in rodeos as a kid because the actor did.
  • Casting Gag: A character is cast in a role specifically to riff on a previous performance, something handled in the writing/casting stage for a specific reason. Example is an actor cast in an antagonist role because they were the hero of a previous work with a similar premise.

Of course, they also deal with the ambiguity of "It's textual in the script/direction/production design/advertising but has one foot in behind-the-scenes decisions" issues.

Do you not know that in the service one must always choose the lesser of two weevils!
MorganWick (Elder Troper)
#11: Apr 22nd 2024 at 7:45:35 PM

[up][up]By searching the Trivia page, I found that both pages were removed from that index in 2018, citing this TRS thread.

Add Post

Total posts: 11
Top