Misused: In Name Only

Go To

Merseyuser1 Since: Sep, 2011

Following this discussion, In Name Only cannot apply to a character.

I've been doing some wick-checking and there are a fair few Character Sheet pages that link to this page.

If, as Fighteer has stated in the thread above:

An individual character cannot be an example of In-Name-Only. It applies to works, specifically.

should this be removed from some Character Sheet pages, and maybe work pages?

Perhaps how it qualifies on a work page might be a useful thing?

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu

Seems like you want a short term project rather than a TRS topic.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

Total posts: 2