Changed w/o discussion: Erotic Literature

Image was recently changed from this◊ to this◊, culprit has been messaged. Just from one look, the new one is slightly more risqué, so which one should stay on the page?

Opened, and... Ugh. I vote that we at least pull the new pic. Not sure about the previous.

edited 7th Oct '16 7:17:24 AM by Berrenta

I think the new one should go.

Nothing wrong with current.

Yeah, current is more reprensentative, though perhaps skirts too close to NSFW

Old one, I honestly can't tell it's supposed to be erotic.

The new illustrates the trope better. I don't think it's NSFW, though, or at least not anymore than browsing a page about Erotic Literature in the first place.

Old one, yeah, not sure how it illustrates.

I like the humor factor of the old more than the straightforwardness of the new. As other considerations, 1◊, 2◊, 3, 4◊, 5◊, 6◊, 7◊

A few of those are better. 2, 5, 6, and 7 all work well.

2 gets my vote.

I wait for the crowner.

One thing to keep in mind is to keep this separate from Romance Cover Scene. I think the last three suggestions in 7 in particular are closer to that trope than this one.

edited 10th Oct '16 8:28:50 AM by Morgenthaler

Fair point, and I tend to agree now that it's brought up.

Per , I've moved the last three suggestions in 7 to their own thread. Any other thoughts on the others? Crowner?

Here's a crowner, excluding images suggested for Romance Cover Scene.

And hooked. Will shut off the clock.

It looks like we will end up with both Erotic Literature and Romance Cover Scene featuring a cover page from literature by Avril Hunnucut, probably illustrated by the same artist. Can we strive for more variance?

edited 5th Nov '16 2:03:06 AM by eroock

Yeah, I'm thinking playing this one straight and having the parody be on Romance Cover Scene would be better.

This one's at 5 days and the leader's the only one in the green, so it's up and tagged. Caption?

Old pic:

edited 9th Nov '16 8:08:17 PM by Willbyr

Hearing nothing, let's lock up.