The previous thread clocked out for lack of consensus on what to do.
I don't think it's NSFW. I think it's a case where it might as well be a page quote. It shows absolutely nothing related to the trope.
Check out my fanfiction!Being NSFW is not really the issue. Telling instead of showing? Yeah, best as a page quote.
she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope ReportI also think it might as well be a quote and I have no ideas for a replacement. Assassin's Creed II had one of these schools but I can't find a good image that doesn't look like a normal brothel.
edited 6th Nov '15 8:44:32 AM by DeisTheAlcano
Rosario + Vampire has a reasonably good example (an Imagine Spot by Tsukune's cousin thinks the school is one of these) but I can't find a decent quality scan of the page unfortunatelynote .
edited 6th Nov '15 9:00:26 AM by SebastianGray
Knowledge is Power, Guard it WellPornographic, not in the slightest. Although I agree on that it works better as a quote.
^^ Though it fits the bill perfectly, I doubt even an HQ version of Page 26 will work nicely on 350p.
I tried a crop of just the corner of that top panel and even as a PNG it's still too grainy to use.
I'm in the "it's not NSFW, but it's a lousy image because it's all text" party.
Reaction Image RepositoryAgreeing with most of the "might as well be page quote" sentiment. Does that reason warrant a pull, though?
Not NSFW at all. It's pretty much only text, though.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanThe only thing it adds is text that's annoyingly small to read. That's worse than nothing.
Check out my fanfiction!We all agree that it's SFW and all text. I lean BUPKIS. Any suggestions?
Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.BUPKIS
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?Not BUPKIS. A school for prostitutes or seduction can be shown with images.
More of a topic for the image policy topic, I think we need to nail down a standard for what is BUPKIS and what is not - it's being used very liberally lately.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI'm leaning towards Keep Until Better Image Suggested right now. Though it's too text reliant to serve as the page image, we can find suitably illustrative images that are SFW, so I guess we can keep this image until... well, that better image is suggested and showcased here.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.Sure, but the text is so small, I have to lean in close to my monitor and squint. It really is just a quote.
edited 9th Nov '15 2:47:42 PM by Josef5678
Septemus, BUPKIS is not the same as saying we shouldn't have a picture. I'm voting BUPKIS because the current sucks and the only other suggestion isn't very good.
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?I also vote to pull the current regardless of replacement.
^^ That is, in fact, kind of what it means.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Okay I worded that horribly.
I mean that I'm not voting for "no picture period".
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?BUPKIS is Blank Until Pretty Kickass Image Suggested.
Which seems to be exactly what you're suggesting.
Health sure is versatile. It's possible to be both light-headed and dim-witted. At the same time, no less.Bump. Can anyone come up with the means to portray this effectively? I can't.
(Annoyed grunt)[1]◊?
... *Deletes search history I got to find that image*
edited 26th Nov '15 7:24:18 PM by Memers
The image refer to a porn comic with text too much explicit.
Vote for no-image.