Follow TV Tropes

Following

Cut out the "Jossed" and "Confirmed" from the WMG pages

Go To

SolipSchism Since: Jun, 2014
#26: Mar 13th 2015 at 10:29:53 AM

[up] Every problem you just mentioned is made irrelevant by the idea of sorting them based on when in the work the guesses were made. If there is a "First Episode" folder, or a "First Season" folder, that means they are guesses made by someone who has seen up to and including that amount, but nothing else. Thus, somebody who has seen the whole show dropping in and saying "No, you're wrong, because in Season Four Bob turns into a werewolf," that person is being an asshole and defeating the spirit of the whole system.

Although I strongly agree with what Fighteer said earlier: These sections (Wallbangers and WMGs) don't need to exist at all, they're allowed for fun and on sufferance, similar to Real Life examples. By that logic, they should follow whatever rules make them the most fun. And since the fun of WMGs consists of making wild guesses, not in finding out from somebody who has watched the whole show that your guess was flat-out wrong or right, then logically, there should be some rule in place to prevent that.

Sorting/grouping WMGs by time frame is one way of doing that. Flat-out nuking the "Jossed/Confirmed" nonsense is another. The two could get combined.

You can't have any fun on a WMG page unless you're respecting the spirit of the page—which is not "Try to predict stuff and then document whether your guess was right or wrong," it's "Consider what you know so far and then make guesses based on that information."

If your sense of self-worth is so intrinsically tied to whether a guess about a television show was right or wrong that you actually need to go make a note to let people know, maybe it's time to take a break from TV and go for a walk or something.

edited 13th Mar '15 10:35:08 AM by SolipSchism

Odd1 Still just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2013 Relationship Status: And here's to you, Mrs. Robinson
Still just awesome like that
#27: Mar 13th 2015 at 10:52:55 AM

I honestly wouldn't mind seeing the WMG pages disappear. Idle speculation is what forum threads about media were made for. Just look at all those old Usenet groups.

Insert witty 'n clever quip here.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#28: Mar 13th 2015 at 11:50:35 AM

I don't really care much for them either, but I do think it's better to have them sorted by time rather than confirmation. It's on occasion interesting to read what theories, wild or not, people had at certain points, but that loses its charm the moment it turns into true or false facts about the series. We've already got trope pages and episode summaries for those. Don't need to make speculations be the same as well, as that kind of takes away the point of speculating.

edited 13th Mar '15 11:50:47 AM by AnotherDuck

Check out my fanfiction!
DiamondWeapon Since: Jan, 2001
#29: Mar 13th 2015 at 3:43:55 PM

If people are to be increasingly excluded from participation the more they know about the subject being discussed, I see nothing interesting in the concept at all.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#30: Mar 13th 2015 at 4:03:06 PM

I don't think that's what "excluded" means.

Check out my fanfiction!
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#31: Mar 14th 2015 at 7:42:38 AM

Nor is that the core issue — rather, it's that there's no way to accommodate the desires of every person who uses WMG without designing an entirely new system, and the ROI on that for the wiki is virtually nil.

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
Odd1 Still just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2013 Relationship Status: And here's to you, Mrs. Robinson
Still just awesome like that
#32: Mar 14th 2015 at 2:29:32 PM

Weren't we designing a new system for the Headscratchers pages (or, if not that, something, I can't remember which)? Why not use that for it as well?

Insert witty 'n clever quip here.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#33: Mar 14th 2015 at 2:50:05 PM

Because WMG is not a form of discussion, unlike Headscratchers.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Odd1 Still just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2013 Relationship Status: And here's to you, Mrs. Robinson
Still just awesome like that
#34: Mar 14th 2015 at 4:05:29 PM

I'd always assumed it was, since I always saw discussion on those pages.

Then again, it's been literally years since I've bothered to venture onto those pages.

Insert witty 'n clever quip here.
Tightwire Since: Apr, 2014
#35: Aug 30th 2015 at 8:43:20 AM

While I don't mind WMG one way or another, I think we should definitely cut out the 'Jossed' entries.

Possibly remove the 'Confirmed' entries, since they would now be proper tropes in the proper page, but Jossed entries should definitely go to slim them down.

Rjinswand Since: Apr, 2015
#36: Aug 30th 2015 at 11:44:53 AM

I don't know, guys.

I always loved WMG, especially for the more mindscrew-y works. It's very interesting to read and see what theories other fans have and compare them to yours. Or, on the other hand, if a work is totally simple and uncomplicated, it's fun to see some weird farfetched theories about it (kind of like the Youtube series Game Theory).

And I don't see what's the problem with "Jossed" and "Confirmed". For me, it's very interesting to see what fans theorized while something was yet unknown, and what was later confirmed or debunked by the newer installments. Do theory authors see those as dismissive, or something? I've never posted my own theories there, so I can only give input as a reader.

The only thing that ever irked me is that apparently every single WMG page has to feature several "X is a Time Lord / Lost character / Star Trek character / character from whatever work is popular" theories that look kind of unimaginative. But maybe that's just a meme, and I'm a total newb. Anyway, that never bothered me too much.

Kayube Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: RelationshipOutOfBoundsException: 1
#37: Oct 4th 2015 at 1:49:03 PM

Might there be a possibility for a split between theories that the creator actually thinks are possible, and theories that are just jokes or pipe dreams that aren't meant to be serious speculation?

Karxrida The Unknown from Eureka, the Forbidden Land Since: May, 2012 Relationship Status: I LOVE THIS DOCTOR!
The Unknown
#38: Oct 4th 2015 at 6:27:45 PM

The problem is that we'd have to figure out some sort of criteria for what can be considered "serious" and have a dedicated clean-up thread, which probably is too much effort what what is essentially a Just for Fun tab.

Something that may be worth doing is to move Jossed/Confirmed entries into folders separate from the rest of the WM Gs. That way we keep the entries to show what people thought before a work came out and remove the ugly double bullets under them.

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#39: Oct 4th 2015 at 6:34:44 PM

[up] I've always been in favor of moving Jossed and Confirmed WMGs to their own folders on those pages.

edited 4th Oct '15 6:34:50 PM by Willbyr

TuefelHundenIV Night Clerk of the Apacalypse. from Doomsday Facility Corner Store. Since: Aug, 2009 Relationship Status: I'd need a PowerPoint presentation
Night Clerk of the Apacalypse.
#40: Oct 4th 2015 at 10:17:12 PM

That sounds like a better option. Much simpler to deal with.

Who watches the watchmen?
KarjamP The imaginative Christian Asperger from South Africa Since: Apr, 2011 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
The imaginative Christian Asperger
Add Post

Total posts: 41
Top