Follow TV Tropes

Following

Ambiguous Name: Authority Equals Asskicking & Asskicking Equals Authority

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Jan 8th 2015 at 11:59:00 PM
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#26: Oct 17th 2014 at 6:15:09 PM

If it's supposedly confusing I suggest making it clear it is confusing outside some people in this thread.

Check out my fanfiction!
isoycrazy Lord of the Blue Star Since: May, 2011 Relationship Status: Abstaining
Lord of the Blue Star
#27: Oct 17th 2014 at 8:49:52 PM

I am about half way done with a 50 count wiki check of Authority Equals Asskicking and have found only one bad example in Supreme Commander where it is more the idea is back tracked rather than confusing with Asskicking Equals Authority.

Sorry for not having more done. Life and work have happened.

edited 17th Oct '14 8:50:25 PM by isoycrazy

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#28: Nov 18th 2014 at 12:22:18 AM

Clock is set.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
isoycrazy Lord of the Blue Star Since: May, 2011 Relationship Status: Abstaining
Lord of the Blue Star
#29: Nov 18th 2014 at 4:23:21 PM

I don't know if this is the proper format

Asskicking Equals Authority wick check shows several ZC Es and a few bad examples because they don't mention the person's strength in context to others.

For Authority Equals Asskicking, there were some more ZC Es and some put with the above as though the person didn't know which truly applied. One instance was here: Resident Evil Roleplaying

If the purpose was to determine ambiguity between the two and if some confused them, there seems to be minor switching.

That said, the ambiguity and requiring to check the exact definition to know which trope should apply to a situation seems to necessitate a change in the names of these tropes.

And sorry for not getting back to this sooner. Life was keeping me busy.

crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#30: Nov 18th 2014 at 5:14:08 PM

How to Do a Wick Check:

For each article where you found a wick, copy and paste the line/sentence it appeared in (this allows other users to double-check your results) and state (preferably in bold) which side of the case it weighs on. Conclude your findings with the relevant statistics.

An alternate method of posting results is to sort the results by verdict so that e.g. all "correct" wicks are organized in one list and all "misuse" wicks are organized in a second list. This makes the results easier to visualize at a glance, unfortunately it takes a lot more work to do it this way.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
isoycrazy Lord of the Blue Star Since: May, 2011 Relationship Status: Abstaining
Lord of the Blue Star
#31: Nov 18th 2014 at 5:38:56 PM

Dang. Missed that part. Thank goodness for history.

isoycrazy Lord of the Blue Star Since: May, 2011 Relationship Status: Abstaining
Lord of the Blue Star
#32: Nov 19th 2014 at 6:57:23 PM

If I don't get the wick check complete by the end of the clock, does that mean I cannot try this argument again?

Batman39 I'm Batman. Since: Oct, 2014
Druplesnubb Editor of Posts Since: Dec, 2013
Editor of Posts
#34: Nov 29th 2014 at 7:13:37 AM

I don't see the problem. Someone reading Asskicking Equals Authority will process it as "asskicking", "equals" and then "authority". This subconsciously implies a causation where it's the asskicking that leads to the authority and not the other way around. I think the actual meaning of the name "equals" is less important in that context.

ObsidianFire Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: Not caught up in your love affair
#36: Nov 29th 2014 at 9:17:27 AM

[up] I agree here. The problem is really all of us math people who know that "equals" means "the same as". Even in normal English, the term "equal" has nothing to do with causation and everything to do with equivalence.

DAN004 Chair Man from The 0th Dimension Since: Aug, 2010
Chair Man
#37: Nov 29th 2014 at 5:09:27 PM

[up][up]

Seconded

MAX POWER KILL JEEEEEEEEWWWWW
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#38: Nov 29th 2014 at 5:38:19 PM

Considering that we still don't have any evidence that there's an actual problem here, I disagree. A minor tweak to wording that won't even affect alphabetization is one thing. Major name changes need a better reason than "whoops, turns out it's possible for the name to be misinterpreted."

Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#39: Nov 30th 2014 at 12:52:38 AM

[up][up] Thirded.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#40: Nov 30th 2014 at 1:39:19 AM

Gonna oppose mainly on the grounds that it's a 3000+ wicks work and with little empirical basis.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#41: Nov 30th 2014 at 1:54:59 AM

If the names really are a problem, there should be a significant number of examples under one trope that belong under the other and vice versa. I still haven't seen any evidence of such.

SatoshiBakura (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#42: Dec 1st 2014 at 7:34:07 PM

The reason I want a name change isn't because people will get confused, but rather proper English is Serious Business. "Equals" means "same as", not "from this comes...".

DAN004 Chair Man from The 0th Dimension Since: Aug, 2010
Chair Man
#43: Dec 2nd 2014 at 5:20:47 PM

[up] as much as I love proper grammar and vocabulary, I must say that so long as the names don't attract misuse, they can be left as it is. (That's why I said long ago that "we're fucking researchers".)

At least with that in mind, we have to prevent this kind of thing from happening again.

MAX POWER KILL JEEEEEEEEWWWWW
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#44: Jan 5th 2015 at 1:05:38 AM

Re-clocking.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#45: Jan 10th 2015 at 1:47:47 AM

Clock is up with no progress; closing.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Add Post

Total posts: 45
Top