Duplicate Image: Erotic Film

The poster is the same as used on the Emmanuelle work page.

I'm fine to cull it from Erotic Film...debating on whether that one should be a "no pic" page from the get-go.

Changed the image. As the creator of the article I take responsibility to do so. It's a picture not used in any of the other articles, not even the one for Turkish Delight, which I created too.

Whoa, whoa, whoa...just because someone makes a page doesn't give them the right to unilaterally make decisions that override the IP or TRS process.

Although it's not a bad choice. But the one up for Turkish Delight is fairly NSFW.

I prefer the pic Patachou put up on Erotic Film on Turkish Delight rather than the latter's current image.

I'm not talking about giving me the right, I just take my responsibility in changing the image, which I did. Already received some info about the image pickin' policy, so I've been informed of that.

Also, the image on Turkish Delight has been there for several months now. Only NOW does somebody complain about it? The complainers probably never saw the movie in the first place. I know the policy on sex and nudity on this site, but come on! You don't even see anything taboo on that picture: no genitals, no depiction of copulation, just a very vague image. If anybody is going to get aroused by this, compared to some of the far more saucier publicity pictures of that film (which I didn't pick for precisely that reason) than they really got an overactive imagination.

We have a very strict policy on nudity. See The Google Incident and The Second Google Incident for why. Just because nobody said anything for months doesn't mean it was wrong. That was far more nudity than we allow for. It should have never been put up in the first place.

edited 2nd Oct '14 4:30:45 AM by Rethkir

Clock is set.

Clock is up with no progress; locking this.