For replacement, is something from Doctor Who well known enough to not be non-illustrative?
OH MY GOD; MY PARENTS ARE GARDENIIIIINNNNGGGGG!!!!!No.
Maybe a 2 part image from Back◊ to the Future◊?
edited 28th May '14 11:40:23 AM by Larkmarn
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.Second link is broken.
Should be fixed.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.It's a little hard to see who's who, but it's possible. It doesn't help that they're in different positions.
Check out my fanfiction!Problem is, any picture for this trope, even if it's an example, would heavily rely on the caption.
Even if text-heavy, I'd rather have a comic panel (or manga, or webcomic, whatever) of a character explaining he/she's your kid from the future.
How about something from Okamiden 100 years in the past? Isun probably said something about Chibiterasu being the future child of Amaterasu
Honestly, I think "text heavy" is roughly the same as "relying on caption". Text is text, and this is about an image.
Check out my fanfiction!I personally see a speech bubble-reliant image as the same as a caption-reliant one, as far as text dependency is concerned.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman[1]◊
Rhymes with "Protracted."Clock is set.
I agree that "text-heavy" and "relies on caption" are extremely similar; but that is just bad, not necessarily fatal.
Let's see one that relies a lot on its caption. "Excellent" is probably out of reach but I bet "pretty good" is do-able.
edited 1st Jul '14 11:25:22 AM by rodneyAnonymous
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Clock's up; locking for inactivity. No further action is to be taken based on this thread.
For this one, I just had too many choices for the reason... it's JAFAAC, it does not illustrate, it's bordeline NSFW... but worst of all, there were a two previous discussions commented out on top of the page, with a request for not adding a new pic without a discussion, which were blatantly ignored.
I think we have a very safe case of "remove" here.