The thing is that they can be mix-matched. The page could be restored as a Sugar Wiki page with unfiltered examples and a wick ban, or a main page with filtered examples and no wick ban. Discussion on what to do with the page should it be restored has no purpose if it's not wanted.
The thing is, people may be in favor of or not in favor of different restore options. So it's possible that restore wins the crowner because everyone has their own favored restore option in mind, and then we can't get everyone to agree on an actual restore approach.
I agree with restoring, but I think some rules need to be put in place to make more objective like So Bad It's Horrible has. A lot of those exampes seemed more "I just happened to like so I'm putting it here", and I spotted some pretty blatant and horrible gushing with nothing to back it up as well.
"It's not that simple. We are all both, good and evil, we have rage and compassion, we have love and hate...murder and forgiveness."
The system doesn't know you right now, so no post button for you. You need to Get Known to get one of those.
Page Action: Too Good To Last 2
4th Jul '13 1:05:32 AM
What would be the best way to fix the page?
Too Good To Last is currently a redirect to Screwed By The Network.
These items list only the basic action to be done. Specifics and technical details will be at issue once a most popular action is determined.