Okay, I'm pretty positive we've already had a thread that went into this one.
EDIT: Or maybe it was just this.
Either way, again, the man looks snarky. Keep Until Better Image Suggested. You should start a thread on the Web Animation one, though, because that one I'd heartily support a pull on.
edited 31st Mar '13 3:17:23 PM by ShadowHog
Moon◊You mean this? https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1316325571047008100&page=1
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!The only deadpan I see is the frying pan she's holding. I believe not having that aspect of the trope is a common problem, so it may be harming the page. I'm for pulling it.
Check out my fanfiction!Hmmmm...is it me, or is that pic kinda artifacted? It has a bit more context than the Morgan Freeman pic on the Live Action Film page (you can see his expression in reaction to her fear of the bunny), but it could be cleaner.
edited 31st Mar '13 3:40:11 PM by Willbyr
Maybe a little blurry, but I'm not seeing any typical telltale artifacts. Plus it's a PNG, so there's that?
Moon◊Yes - it's his expression that sells it. Keep Until Better Image Suggested.
The Revolution Will Not Be TropeableI think it's his expression that detracts from it, to the point of being misleading.
Check out my fanfiction!Agreed, his expression is really good for this trope.
These are really hard to not get JAFAA Cs, but it's pretty good. His expression seems deadpan, the situation is clearly madcap, and he's clearly talking.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.I think he looks surprised. Calmly surprised, but surprised. Too animated. And not deadpan.
edited 31st Mar '13 10:33:15 PM by AnotherDuck
Check out my fanfiction!This image needs some cropping that we can actually see the face.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI can't really make out his expression at this resolution, and I'm afraid that a close-up without the rabbit in it just wouldn't make sense. I get what the picture is going for, I just don't think it's doing it well.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!I agree. He doesn't look very snarky and she detracts from his expression. I don't know about a replacement. Mittens◊ maybe?
That's an improvement over no image which is an improvement over the current.
Check out my fanfiction!That.
Not that. How about Mittens is good, the current is also good, either are better than none.
edited 9th Apr '13 9:14:42 AM by Telcontar
That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.That just looks sleepy to me.
I think snarkiness is really helped by seeing what they're snarking at... can't be snarky on your lonesome, now can you?
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.I have to agree. Not impressed with the Mittens pic as is.
That doesn't look sleepy to me...
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanIt's the eyebrows that mean I don't read it as sleepy.
That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.I approve of the Mittens pic.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!I prefer the existing image.
Moon◊Cocked eyebrow on the Mittens pic suggests laconic, not sleepy to me. I'd support swapping it, but current is also fine.
Do we want a crowner for this?
^ I would like to seem some more suggestions first if anyone has some.
While we're on the topic of snarking, it's been awhile since I've seen Tangled and I'm pretty sure it has a few snarkers in it, but I fail to see how "scared girl wrapped around her love interest holding a frying pan" is at all illustrative of being a deadpan snarker.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!