The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

No Lewdness, No Prudishness states:

Titillation links. Tell, don't show. We don't need screen shots to illustrate NSFW fanservice. If a reader is really curious, they can go look it up on Google. (See also Weblinks Are Not Examples.)

So I think you are safe in axing the link even without permission, assuming of course that it isn't an edit war like scenario.

Well, the link's in the explanation bit before all the examples, and it doesn't seem to have any reason to be there, so...

Kill It with Fire. And by the way, the Film page for 50 Shades is still unlocked. Textbook Loophole Abuse bait, methinks.

Hm, the Literature page is indeed locked. For context, the offending link is the second one on the page, and the first external link on it should also be cut as it is a dead link that currently leads to nowhere.

^I posted that issue on the locked pages thread

edited 5th Dec '16 5:06:20 AM by Daefaroth

Cool, thanks.

In other news, I was on the hunt for skeevy Dn D Poisoned cutscenes to show you guys and... oh boy, this does not bode well. These cutscenes are all accessed only by going one particular route, and so if the two characters involved were in their teens at the very least I probably wouldn't have flagged it (and I say "probably" because one of them is Older Than He Looks in the source material either way). As it stands, however, this VN is set during the first half of the Death Note timeline, meaning that the two characters involved here - Mello and Near - are preteens.

Unfortunately, I've only been able to find a good selection of these cutscenes of Photobucket, and due to its complex hotlinking methods I can only link you the gallery: http://photobucket.com/images/near%20and%20mello;%20dnd%20poisoned%20game%20by%20akane

The first page has an image of Mello and Near engaging in sexual intercourse. No genitals are shown, but it's pretty obvious what's going on.

The second page is filled with images of half-naked Near coupled with tiltilating text. Not good. There's also a shot of Near having just taken his shirt off, and a couple of shots of Mello with his hand down Near's pants.

The third page has a suspicious image of Near sitting in Mello's lap with Mello's hand covering his mouth and sliding in his unbuttoned shirt. Also another mid-coitus shot; again, no genitals are shown.

And the fourth page and beyond is just repeats of earlier images along with lots of images unrelated to the VN itself. Thus, there may have been something I missed, but even so I seriously think this is enough to send the Dn D Poisoned page to the cutlist, or at least ensure that the NSFW ending is not mentioned on the page (which shouldn't be too difficult, as it doesn't get edited very often.)

edited 5th Dec '16 11:38:11 PM by Psychedelicate

I feel like this would be a good time to refer back to the old visual novel 5P clarification thing (to put all the information in one place so every 5P member doesn't have to do their own research).

In terms of our usual visual novel standards this would be an easy pass; it's just the matter of preteens being involved in this secret ending that's a problem.

edited 6th Dec '16 5:45:14 AM by Assassin-sensei

Hm. The trope page claims there is an ending with another character (Matt) where he and the player character (Mello) decide to be Friends with Benefits. Matt is about the same age is Mello and Near, the main pairing of the game. So I'll see if I can find any C Gs involving Matt, and hopefully the sex is offscreen.

I also have the game myself and am in the process of playing it for entertainment purposes. If necessary, I can make a new save on it for research purposes. I am currently midway through the first route I'm playing, and nothing questionable has occurred in my memory.

ETA: Oop, I found something... Hmm◊

So that's two endings with onscreen preteen sex. Granted, the Matt ending only has one CG that I can find, whereas the NSFW Near ending has multiple. And the rest of the game is fairly clean, no fanservice or anything as far as I can tell.

edited 6th Dec '16 3:59:11 PM by Psychedelicate

I submitted a report on the character page for The Rock Cocks. Most pictures got scrubbed, but I'm wondering if Roxanne, the Character under Maleficent Records, has her nipples showing. Granted it's hard to see with the bustier, but I think it's sheer.

edited 7th Dec '16 3:09:26 PM by DrPsyche

It appears to be so to me. I can definitely see a darker area where her nipples would be, so even if those aren't actually them, the shirt is clearly designed to make you think they are. I would say new image if possible.

This sounds more like a job for Image Pickin' than P5, but yeah, Roxanne's image does appear to be rather NSFW.

Yep, that's definitely her nipples showing there. Purge away.

I've zapped it.

Alright cool, I asked here rather than an image picking thread because it was already discussed here and I felt that the cleanup missed an image.

It was also in the Projects section cleanup thread and indeed looks like I missed that one.

Was The Rock Cocks voted to keep? It looks more like a sex comedy-type thing - the sex and revealing outfits are intended to amuse rather than arouse.

The voting on the comic itself hasn't finished yet, it's still hanging there.

Ah, okay. From what I can see, I'd say it's a keeper.

I did suggest (and have been using the term since) that we have a squid-head option for "this isn't something for P5, hand it over to the appropriate section of the board."

I don't know. Last I heard, tentacles were still a controversial subject in these parts.

I was looking at the old resolved CV Rs out of curiosity and noticed Bete Noire was previously cut. We have pages for two other "sex games" in LJ/DWRP- Amat Omnes and Microcosm, so it's probably worth ruling on them for consistency.

Not that there's much to look at- all the IC content in Amat, sexual or otherwise, is hidden from non-members, and Microcosm appears to have been deleted and purged at some point (might be accessible via Wayback Machine though.)

I only know anything about what went on in either game secondhand because of the "locked from non-members" thing. From the sound of it they weren't 100% porn all the time, there was slice-of-life going on in between the Mate or Die stuff; Amat's rules (which are still up and viewable allow for a "fade to black" instead of explicit sexual content.

Back when Amat opened, there was significant wank about allowing underage characters in and whether that counted as pedo even though they were physically aged up. I think that's probably where the "must show in their applications [for minor characters] that they are mentally mature enough to handle the adult situations they will be getting into" and "no sex with minors" clauses come from. According to the FAQ, children born into the setting were sent away to a separate island until they turned 18. (The other major drama on opening, BTW, was about the setup implying characters in Amat were raped on arrival. It looks like they kept that.)

IDK what Microcosm's rules were.

I also will vote Rock Cocks as a keeper. I just click the small angel right?

I believe so?

Yep. I already dropped an angel on it too, so yours would be the third.

Hm, those livejournal R Ps are a hard case to judge the material of with that restriction and the nuking.

edited 9th Dec '16 10:51:14 PM by Adannor