The sub-forum is used for discussions that adjudicate possible violations of The Content Policy. Threads here can be created by flagging a page through the sidebar "report" button and toggling "The page may violate the Content Policy".
This thread is for general discussion of pages.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 10th 2022 at 11:50:32 AM
I agree, I was just trying to make sure no one got the wrong idea, even if the summary at the top does state it rather clearly.
I did not know that, having jumped around a bit in this thread. I see.
The internet is stronger than me. That roleplay is... [CENSORED FOR THE SAKE OF DECENCY] .
BTW should we edit the l word out of the article on Sankaku Complex
Guys, Popotan is available on Netflix.
I seriously doubt that Netflix carries child pornography. Also, none of the reviews on our website describe it as "hard core". They explicitly say that it is not hentai.
Consider this review at Netflix: There is some gratuitous fan service in the form of bathing scenes. I suppose that helps keep the boys interested in what is really a girl-oriented anime about relationships. One reviewer pronounced this "child pornography." That is not true. Child pornography is depicting children in sexual situations. Grandma's baby-in-the-bath snapshots will not put her in the slammer. Popotan's nudity is non-sexual.
If indeed the only thing that can be said about it is the bathing scenes, it would put it in the same category as stuff like Inu Yasha and Ranma One Half.
edited 12th May '12 8:43:50 PM by Catbert
I assume you mean something that rhymes with Lola?
Not a bad idea I don't think anyone will mind if its gone but might if it stays.
I don't think netflix has been taken into account but I don't know for sure.
edited 12th May '12 8:46:40 PM by Shadis
Netflix is in with the conspiracy too! So is Walt Disney! The truth is out there!
No, it does not rhyme with lola, it rhymes with dolly.
Wow, Popotan even got an English dub.
My research suggests that this show is rated between TV MA to R+ for mild nudity.
From what I've heard this series could be considered Ecchi. And it is worth noting that Ranma One Half is rated PG for mild nudity, so this nudity might be of a different flavour.
I can have a look and give a proper opinion though.
...
Oh. Is Popotan responsible for this◊?
edited 12th May '12 8:57:09 PM by UltimatelySubjective
"Nullius addictus iurare in verba magistri, quo me cumque rapit tempestas, deferor hospes."Yes. It says so on the trope page itself that's where it came from.
We Are Our Avatars Forever (Now on Discord by invitation, PM)Well gee, that alone makes it cut worthy :P
Wasn't the Caramelldansen meme from an h-game?
If that's the case then is there an anime version of Popotan?
If so then the anime is probable safe and the page got flagged for the vn.
Well in that case is it clean enough to keep? edit: And is it any good compared to the vn?
edited 12th May '12 9:26:09 PM by Shadis
Catbert found an anime of it on the netflix.
Like I said it still has a moderate maybe high age rating and it's for mild nudity. It probably won't be cut for sex unless it's nothing but ecchi (unlike the VN, which even then I haven't played) so it probably depends on the characters' ages and how they are portrayed.
edited 12th May '12 9:26:54 PM by UltimatelySubjective
"Nullius addictus iurare in verba magistri, quo me cumque rapit tempestas, deferor hospes."I was the one who flagged Popotan, for the VN which is allegedly hardcore lolicon involving sex. The anime is apparently more or less "loli fanservice" from the reviews on it, so not sure if it is okay or not. If it is, this is definitely a case where the Bleached Underpants version should stay and the VN not.
?Based on the other thread, the question is now is it loli fanservice, or just shounen fanservice.
Or "Are the underpants bleached enough?"
"Nullius addictus iurare in verba magistri, quo me cumque rapit tempestas, deferor hospes.""ALLEGEDLY hardcore lolicon" I honestly don't doubt this but I would like for someone who has played it to confirm this so we can be sure.
Well if the citations are cited then go ahead and nuke the vn.
Now lets get cracking on the anime, anyone seen it?
edited 12th May '12 10:05:14 PM by Shadis
Mii is 11 years old.
The wikipedia list of characters says:
That's pretty damning. But the anime is not hentai, so I feel it deserves a look at least to see whether it's also pedo-pandering.
"Nullius addictus iurare in verba magistri, quo me cumque rapit tempestas, deferor hospes."I was referring to the anime, for the record.
I would hope so, if you we referring to an h-game as shounen I would assume you were drunk or something.
I have seen the anime and if I remember correctly Mii was never nude around any male characters only female which makes it pretty innocent, but she discusses her A-CupAngst a lot.
edited 12th May '12 10:22:18 PM by GraySloth
I'm still amazed Sonichu passed. Isn't there one page where about a third of it is taken up by the Author Avatar's enormous penis?
The pig of Hufflepuff pulsed like a large bullfrog. Dumbledore smiled at it, and placed his hand on its head: "You are Hagrid now."Contains sex scenes is not what we're cutting. Porn is not just a work with sex in it. It's a work where sex is the primary element.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
I was keeping up with Nana To Kaoru for a while and "very ecchi but not porn" is correct, at least up to the last chapter that I read...so many titles that I need to catch up on. *sigh*
edited 12th May '12 6:41:39 PM by Willbyr