Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
From the sounds of it, we won't be able to have any examples for it that wouldn't also be covered on other pages. (I can think of a couple of Ecchi works for which this would apply better than the Tethercat Principle, but in those cases And the Adventure Continues would apply even better than this.)
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
Bump. Given that Tethercat Principle has a TRS going on about renaming or redirect farming, I would be inclined to merge them under this, that or another name.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Tsundere pet.
Redirecting to Tethercat Principle would be fine.
Calling someone a pedant is an automatic Insult Backfire. Real pedants will be flattered.
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
'Kay. So, let's close the Tethercat Principle TRS thread and crowner the merger options here?
Or close this thread and crowner it there?
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Tsundere pet.
Close this, crowner there.
Calling someone a pedant is an automatic Insult Backfire. Real pedants will be flattered.
I am proceeding to do so, wait a sec.
Done and hook-hollered.
Discussion continues here
edited 25th Apr '12 8:21:42 AM by SeptimusHeap
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Especially in the wake of the porn ban, but probably really in the first place, maybe this should be a simple example under Tethercat Principle? It's just an instance of that, and the given description is only a few paragraphs, and can probably be cut down to a single short one. Plus, "No End In Sight" almost seems to describe Tethercat Principle better than "Tethercat Principle," certainly with no indication it's specific to porn, let alone the kind of generic, "background sex" porn it seems to be describing.
My posts make considerably more sense read in the voice of John Ratzenberger.