TV Tropes Org

Forums

search forum titles
google site search
Wiki Headlines
We've switched servers and will be updating the old code over the next couple months, meaning that several things might break. Please report issues here.
Total posts: [11]
1

Disillusioned with writing:

 1 Jabrosky, Mon, 26th Mar '12 7:48:31 PM from San Diego, CA
Madman
I've always been a creative type who enjoyed drawing, writing, and world-building, but after recent reflection on my motivations for writing in particular I feel that they are inadequate. For several years my main reasons for writing anything were rooted in politics, especially anti-racism, and I was hoping to use my fiction as an outlet for making the world a better place in one way or another. However, I am finding that my political agendas are getting in the way of my storytelling. For instance, it's very hard to write multidimensional characters if the reason you created those characters in the first place is to uplift the marginalized ethnic group they come from. Because of this I wonder if I should give up writing fiction altogether. I can't continue letting my politics and idealism interfere with my creativity.
Element of love
It isn't bad to have a message. But It's important to remeber that people like stories to have fun first and foremost not to be preached.

You can show your message if your story is not just an Author Tract but a conveying tale on it's own.

Characters need to be interesting people first and then living aesops

edited 26th Mar '12 8:00:51 PM by FallenLegend

I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. C. S. Lewis
 3 Killer Clowns, Mon, 26th Mar '12 8:18:44 PM from the Midwest Relationship Status: Shipping fictional characters
Easily entertained
I've felt that myself. Some of my favorite characters came from me deciding to write sympathetic characters with views utterly opposite of my own. There are beliefs I find inherently abhorrent, and can forgive only on grounds of ignorance enforced by others. But on many others, much of my best writing came from my endeavors to treat characters from a different shade of grey sympathetically. So look at some of them — they're around, even if they aren't the crux of the story.

Let's take an old classic. Order Versus Chaos. If you inherently mistrust society as a force that constrains and irrevocably damages the human psyche, attempt to write, if only as an experiment, a noble, sympathetic, and even intelligent character who sincerely believes that, while an evil society should not be permitted, it must be replaced by one founded first upon laws and reason. If you believe human civilization is at its core, the most beautiful things mankind has created, take some time to put to paper one who, though able to remain good and true to friends and strangers alike, has suffered much from its existence and cannot help but question whether or not all the safety of society is worth the price paid by our souls.

I'm greatly simplifying a question without an easy answer, of course. And both sides have their own, equally well-intentioned theories on how to deal with the world's more unambiguous wrongs. The conflict between these two can be powerful stuff.

EDIT: [down][down]And this.

edited 26th Mar '12 8:39:39 PM by KillerClowns

 4 Night, Mon, 26th Mar '12 8:27:54 PM from PSNS Intrepid Relationship Status: Drift compatible
Who you are does not matter.
I just tell a story. And then all these damn fools come along and decide "what I was really trying to say'".

Finding Forrester aside, you've discovered the preaching to the converted paradox. Intelligent people want you to try and convince them and recoil from those who preach to believers. Stories must struggle greatly to avert this when they wish to have a message, and almost always fail. Even reading your own is usually unpleasant.
Trusted Poster of Legitimate Advice (from Wo-Chan)
Also known as Katz
The best way to create characters that uplift a marginalized group is to make them multidimensional and interesting—the last thing that you want is to make a character defined by his or her race.

Element of love
[up]couldn't have said it better.
I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. C. S. Lewis
 7 Jabrosky, Mon, 26th Mar '12 8:39:00 PM from San Diego, CA
Madman
[up][up]Good point, I wish I had thought of that earlier.
Also known as Katz
So you should keep writing, because a story portraying members of marginalized groups as real people in the roles usually reserved for straight white dudes (like protagonist), you're already creating a positive force to combat racism.

 9 Mr.Cales, Mon, 26th Mar '12 11:30:07 PM from Misty Mountains
One of the Nine
Write, then edit like hell. And remember you might be wrong. Don't get discouraged; use it to learn.

I had much the same problem and am glad to say I've mostly conquered it. It can be done, one just needs to... hold on a bit looser to one's beliefs.
STAND BACK! I TAKE LARGE STEPS!
 10 JHM, Fri, 30th Mar '12 9:49:56 AM from Neither Here Nor There Relationship Status: I know
Thunder, Perfect Mind
[up] Definitely. Shoehorning one's own beliefs into a story is never a good way to go about things, but it's also unwise, perhaps, to pretend that one does not have opinions at all.
 11 Mr.Cales, Fri, 30th Mar '12 11:14:40 PM from Misty Mountains
One of the Nine
[up] It is best to hold loosely, to remember that everything is; that your opinions are, at best, only right some of the time. Nobody's right all the time. And every wrong answer is right sometimes.
STAND BACK! I TAKE LARGE STEPS!
The system doesn't know you right now, so no post button for you.
You need to Get Known to get one of those.
Total posts: 11
1


TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy