Wow, this just seems like another glurge trope. I'd say cut it.
Support Gravitaz on Kickstarter!I'll also argue for a cut (though if we keep it, it might work better as trivia than as YMMV.)
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something AwfulCut; it's pretty much impossible to mention this trope without gushing.
I'm not crazy, I just don't give a darn!Yeah, I'm for cutting this, as well. We have more than enough gushing tropes already.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.I could see this being reYKTTWed as in-universe announcements, like Gundam 00 did a few of these and so did Ghost In The Shell.
as is nah maybe Trivia though.... maybe.
edited 20th Dec '11 4:14:21 PM by Raso
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!Yeah, may as well cut it.
"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon StewartAlthough the original intent was an announcement that sent people into a frenzy of discussion, good or bad. What if we made it a no-example page?
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.That's not really a trope or anything interesting enough to warrant a page.
Cut it. It's trivia at best, and not very interesting trivia.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.Cut It. Not seeing the value in this. Subjective as hell too.
Cut.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickOkay, cut was declined. So do we ask again, or just make this definition only?
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.Perhaps a crowner?
Support Gravitaz on Kickstarter!Did you send a link to this thread supporting the cut? Maybe they just saw there was a TRS and didn't cut because of that, ignoring that it's the TRS that decided to cut.
edited 8th Jan '12 3:49:36 AM by DrMcNinja
There are no heroes left in Man.I didn't make the request, but who did had included the URL of this thread. You can see it on the recent cut list.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.Then we should make a crowner to decide if it gets cut or not. I don't think they can ignore it if there's consensus.
There are no heroes left in Man.If my opinion matters, I'd like it to stay an example-free definition. There are some small-scale occasions where it is invoked; an example I can think of off the top of my head was when the longtime GM of A Game Of Chance said that he was going to resign. There, it lived up to its definition and provoked shock and discussion, just as the definition says.
I am fully aware that that is a rare exception rather than the rule and was thinking of adding this to the RP's works page because of the shock and discussion it provoked, but I just wanted to throw in my two cents before the entry gets redlinked.
"Jack, you have debauched my sloth."So crowner whether to cut, make example free, or other options we can still throw in here.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.I made a single-prop crowner to decide if we will cut this or not.
Why not a page action, since there are other things more might prefer?
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.I've noticed that page-action crowners tend to get kind of messy. If we decide we don't want to cut this we can always make another crowner.
But you're putting one option ahead of the others. We should have both choices at once, not just going for one only after the other is voted down.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.Can we stick with the single proposition anyway, or should we restart the crowning?
Crown Description:
Megaton Announcement
The original intent for this was any announcement that set a whole bunch of discussion off, positive or negative. It seems to have just turned into "Gushing about announcements you like".
But even without that, it's an audience reaction at best, and barely tropeworthy. So should we cut this, or try to find a way to fix it?
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.