Follow TV Tropes

Following

I'm not sure I should have made this YMMV trope.: Megaton Announcement

Go To

Deadlock Clock: May 5th 2012 at 11:59:00 PM
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#1: Dec 20th 2011 at 12:12:07 AM

The original intent for this was any announcement that set a whole bunch of discussion off, positive or negative. It seems to have just turned into "Gushing about announcements you like".

But even without that, it's an audience reaction at best, and barely tropeworthy. So should we cut this, or try to find a way to fix it?

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Firebert That One Guy from Somewhere in Illinois Since: Jan, 2001
That One Guy
#2: Dec 20th 2011 at 12:51:20 AM

Wow, this just seems like another glurge trope. I'd say cut it.

Support Gravitaz on Kickstarter!
feotakahari Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer from Looking out at the city Since: Sep, 2009
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
#3: Dec 20th 2011 at 12:54:03 AM

I'll also argue for a cut (though if we keep it, it might work better as trivia than as YMMV.)

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
FinalStarman from Clinton, Massachusetts Since: Nov, 2011
#4: Dec 20th 2011 at 12:57:32 AM

Cut; it's pretty much impossible to mention this trope without gushing.

I'm not crazy, I just don't give a darn!
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
Komodin TV Tropes' Sonic Wiki Curator from Windy Hill Zone Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: I like big bots and I can not lie
TV Tropes' Sonic Wiki Curator
#6: Dec 20th 2011 at 2:19:11 AM

Yeah, I'm for cutting this, as well. We have more than enough gushing tropes already.

Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.
Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#7: Dec 20th 2011 at 4:14:02 PM

I could see this being reYKTTWed as in-universe announcements, like Gundam 00 did a few of these and so did Ghost In The Shell.

as is nah maybe Trivia though.... maybe.

edited 20th Dec '11 4:14:21 PM by Raso

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
HiddenFacedMatt Avatars may be subject to change without notice. Since: Jul, 2011
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
#8: Dec 20th 2011 at 5:21:45 PM

Yeah, may as well cut it.

"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#9: Jan 5th 2012 at 10:57:35 AM

Although the original intent was an announcement that sent people into a frenzy of discussion, good or bad. What if we made it a no-example page?

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Arha Since: Jan, 2010
#10: Jan 5th 2012 at 11:00:46 AM

That's not really a trope or anything interesting enough to warrant a page.

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#11: Jan 5th 2012 at 12:01:14 PM

Cut it. It's trivia at best, and not very interesting trivia.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#12: Jan 5th 2012 at 12:02:27 PM

Cut It. Not seeing the value in this. Subjective as hell too.

shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#13: Jan 5th 2012 at 3:21:19 PM

Cut.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#14: Jan 7th 2012 at 10:35:00 PM

Okay, cut was declined. So do we ask again, or just make this definition only?

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Firebert That One Guy from Somewhere in Illinois Since: Jan, 2001
DrMcNinja Batman Since: May, 2011
Batman
#16: Jan 8th 2012 at 3:04:06 AM

[up][up] Did you send a link to this thread supporting the cut? Maybe they just saw there was a TRS and didn't cut because of that, ignoring that it's the TRS that decided to cut.

edited 8th Jan '12 3:49:36 AM by DrMcNinja

There are no heroes left in Man.
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#17: Jan 8th 2012 at 10:52:45 AM

I didn't make the request, but who did had included the URL of this thread. You can see it on the recent cut list.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
DrMcNinja Batman Since: May, 2011
Batman
#18: Jan 8th 2012 at 11:40:35 AM

Then we should make a crowner to decide if it gets cut or not. I don't think they can ignore it if there's consensus.

There are no heroes left in Man.
CrystalGlacia from at least we're not detroit Since: May, 2009
#19: Jan 16th 2012 at 8:07:57 AM

If my opinion matters, I'd like it to stay an example-free definition. There are some small-scale occasions where it is invoked; an example I can think of off the top of my head was when the longtime GM of A Game Of Chance said that he was going to resign. There, it lived up to its definition and provoked shock and discussion, just as the definition says.

I am fully aware that that is a rare exception rather than the rule and was thinking of adding this to the RP's works page because of the shock and discussion it provoked, but I just wanted to throw in my two cents before the entry gets redlinked.

"Jack, you have debauched my sloth."
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#20: Feb 2nd 2012 at 12:27:13 PM

So crowner whether to cut, make example free, or other options we can still throw in here.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
MyTimingIsOff Since: Dec, 2011
#21: Feb 2nd 2012 at 12:33:17 PM

I made a single-prop crowner to decide if we will cut this or not.

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#22: Feb 2nd 2012 at 1:01:27 PM

Why not a page action, since there are other things more might prefer?

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
MyTimingIsOff Since: Dec, 2011
#23: Feb 2nd 2012 at 1:11:07 PM

[up]I've noticed that page-action crowners tend to get kind of messy. If we decide we don't want to cut this we can always make another crowner.

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#24: Feb 2nd 2012 at 1:13:38 PM

But you're putting one option ahead of the others. We should have both choices at once, not just going for one only after the other is voted down.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Myra Since: Oct, 2011
#25: Mar 7th 2012 at 10:45:37 AM

Can we stick with the single proposition anyway, or should we restart the crowning?

PageAction: MegatonAnnouncement
8th May '12 3:01:24 PM

Crown Description:

Megaton Announcement

Total posts: 66
Top