Total posts: 
Paypal's policies regarding charities and money laundering:
WARNING: This following post is highly flammable. Try to keep the civility So a website wanted to make a little christmas charity drive. Nothing complex just having some members donate money to buy presents for kids and give money to families in need. Then this happened. Personally I think Pay-Pal is in the wrong here for locking an account for vague reasons but others might disagree with me Here is some points about Paypal being wrong.
KarkadinnPaypal does this sort of thing all the freaking time, but I found this tidbit particularly amusing:
PAYPAL: I havenít seen that PDF. And what youíre doing is not a worthy cause, itís charity. ME: Whatís the difference? PAYPAL: You can use the donate button to raise money for a sick cat, but not poor people.They're in a nice little state of limbo where they have all the profit of a bank and none of the (lol) responsibility of one.
Furthermore, I think Guantanamo must be destroyed.
I Am The WalrusWhat if you want to help dogs?
More Buscemi at http://forum.reelsociety.com/
Cold.I think the reason you can help the sick cat but not poor people is that it's easier to launder money if your claim you're giving it to people. If that's not true, I have no idea why that policy should exist.
Sex, Drugs, and Rationality
Not entirely a doucheWhat is Regretsy?
PHD in Thuganomics
What is Regretsy?A catalogue of the worst and weirdest things on Etsy, by the looks of it.
Everything is best in moderation.
I want Kat's glasses!>Look article
>Pictures of crying children Oh the anvils! They hurt!
They Called Me Mad!! I decided to show them all; but when I looked on my works, oh mighty, I despaired: for it made me realize they were right.
I changed accounts.Mm. I'm not sure how to take this. On the one hand, money laundering is a big deal; on the other hand, it's kind of a dick move to not let charities do their thing. ~shrug~ They'd be better off simply trying to verify the authenticity of the charity's operations, but I grasp that PayPal probably lacks both the time and ambition to do such...
I am now known as Flyboy.
This sort of thing is why I don't use Paypal under any circumstances. They're secure from the buyer's side, but from what I've seen, their primary means of income is refusing to give the seller the money.
With Mod Hat On"Paypal is at it again" is an example of a deceptive/inflammatory thread title. It invites the reader to go looking for a sensationalist story without giving any idea of what the story actually is. It also prejudices the reader against Paypal by implying that they are doing whatever "it" is repeatedly. A better title might be "Paypal's policies regarding charities and money laundering". In fact, I'm changing it.
Neoclassicism, AKA the Tinkerbell school of economics.
That article.. um... Watch for falling anvils.
"This thread has gone so far south it's surrounded by nesting penguins. " — Madrugada
The system doesn't know you right now, so no post button for you.
You need to Get Known to get one of those.
Total posts: 12
TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from firstname.lastname@example.org.