Follow TV Tropes

Following

Electric Vehicles (Cars, Planes, and Ships)

Go To

A thread to discuss electric vehicles and hybrid technology. No politics, please.

Technology, commercial aspects and marketing are all on-topic.


  • Companies (e.g. Tesla Inc.) are only on-topic when discussing their electric vehicle products and research, not their wider activities. The exception is when those wider activities directly impact (or are impacted by) their other business areas - e.g. if electric vehicle development is cut back due to losses in another part of the business.

  • Technology that's not directly related to electric vehicles (e.g. general battery research) is off-topic unless you're discussing how it might be used for vehicles.

  • If we're talking about individuals here, that should only be because they've said or done something directly relevant to the topic. Specifically, posts about Tesla do not automatically need to mention Elon Musk. And Musk's views, politics and personal life are firmly off-topic unless you can somehow show that they're relevant to electric cars.

    Original post 
I was surprised there wasn't one already, so here's the spot to disscuss electric cars, hybrids, ect. No politicsing this thread please.

Also, posting this late, so sorry for any misspellings I might have left in there.

(Mod edited to replace original post)

Edited by Mrph1 on Mar 29th 2024 at 4:14:39 PM

Joesolo Indiana Solo Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Indiana Solo
#26: Oct 12th 2011 at 8:29:48 PM

I'd really like to see improvments in solar technology so it'd be really worthwhile to put a solar pannel on a electric car. right now, eh. You'd get a few extra miles outta it and you could recharge, slowly, anywhere so you couldn't get stuck. Butits not highly effective for recharging.

I'm baaaaaaack
RocketDude Face Time from AZ, United States Since: May, 2009
Face Time
#27: Oct 12th 2011 at 8:30:05 PM

Speaking of magnetic induction, the writer for Road & Track's "Tech Tidbits" column mentioned that Rare Earths are not necessary since we could just build induction motors or something to that effect.

^Well, the Nissan Leaf and Fisker Karma have solar panels on their roofs, I think.

edited 12th Oct '11 8:31:08 PM by RocketDude

"Hipsters: the most dangerous gang in the US." - Pacific Mackerel
Pykrete NOT THE BEES from Viridian Forest Since: Sep, 2009
NOT THE BEES
#28: Oct 12th 2011 at 8:39:35 PM

One thing to consider is that until we get our power grid off coal, transitioning to electric cars and moving the energy load there may actually be more harmful than staying on gasoline :|

I remember doing some research a couple years ago on a vanadium boride battery model that winds up having a greater energy density than gasoline. Even if it is a good deal heavier it would probably come somewhat close to a tank of gas in distance. The downshot is it's morbidly toxic if it breaks for whatever reason.

sketch162000 Since: Nov, 2010
#29: Oct 12th 2011 at 9:46:54 PM

[up]Meh, it could accelerate a transition to sustainable, what with the fuel companies losing a demand for oil products. I imagine that's how it will pan out anyway, eventually...with the old oil companies going green.

edited 12th Oct '11 9:47:36 PM by sketch162000

deathjavu This foreboding is fa... from The internet, obviously Since: Feb, 2010
This foreboding is fa...
#30: Oct 12th 2011 at 10:30:33 PM

[up][up] False. Even if all the extra power generation came from coal it would still produce less CO 2, and possibly less other waste, than a fleet of cars.

The reason for this is very simple: central power generation is more efficient, both in terms to usage and capturing emissions, than small distributed power generation, i.e. internal combustion engines.

Look, you can't make me speak in a logical, coherent, intelligent bananna.
Pykrete NOT THE BEES from Viridian Forest Since: Sep, 2009
NOT THE BEES
#31: Oct 12th 2011 at 10:44:19 PM

Eh, fair enough. I'd like to see numbers to confirm it, but it makes enough sense that I won't bother to argue.

One of the hidden problems with implementing electric is that you're going to be screwing over rural areas for a good long while. Most of the cars are parked on open streets instead of garages and stuff, and you can't exactly have outlets just sitting exposed in a high-rain area with wildlife chewing on everything in sight.

edited 12th Oct '11 10:45:19 PM by Pykrete

sketch162000 Since: Nov, 2010
#32: Oct 12th 2011 at 10:52:23 PM

Well, people already have outlets on the outside of their houses and animals won't trouble sufficiently thick or easily replaceble cables. Another idea I've heard is battery swapping...that at the filling station you simply swap out your dead batteries instead of recharging them.

edited 12th Oct '11 10:55:25 PM by sketch162000

Pykrete NOT THE BEES from Viridian Forest Since: Sep, 2009
NOT THE BEES
#33: Oct 12th 2011 at 11:10:45 PM

Battery swapping is nice for long trips, but not really a solution for domestic recharge. Those things are like 100 pounds of solid metal. I mean, my mother has back problems. I've lived in six-floor apartment complexes with no elevator. My grandmother is 70 and lives on a farmhouse with a long footpath between the driveway and front door. I don't even want to think about that shit.

EDIT: Oh, you said at the station. It's decent for that and you can have the staff do it if you happen to be disabled or whatever.

edited 12th Oct '11 11:11:48 PM by Pykrete

Balmung Since: Oct, 2011
#34: Oct 12th 2011 at 11:24:49 PM

Just to point out about the range thing: Tesla Motor's range claims are well in excess of 100 miles and relatively fast charging for most purposes since it's easy to top off at your house,.

Model S

The base model will have a range of 160 miles (260 km) when fully charged, and a 0 to 60 mph (0 to 97 km/h) acceleration of 5.6 seconds. The premium Signature Series will have a larger battery pack available with ranges of 230 and 300 miles (370 and 480 km).[3][4] The first 1,000 cars to be produced will be of the premium Signature version.[3] Charging times vary depending on the battery pack's state-of-charge, its overall capacity, the available voltage, and the available circuit breaker amp rating (current). A complete charge may take three or more hours[4] using standard US 110 VAC household circuits or a 45-minute Quick Charge to 80%, equivalent to adding 170 miles (270 km)-of-range for each hour charging, will be possible when connected to a DC fast-charger. In addition, a battery swap will be possible in less than two minutes.[5]

Tesla Roadster

According to the U.S. EPA, the Roadster can travel 244 miles (393 km) on a single charge[12] of its lithium-ion battery pack, and can accelerate from 0 to 60 mph (0 to 97 km/h) in 3.7 or 3.9 seconds depending on the model. The Roadster's efficiency, as of September 2008, was reported as 120 mpgge (2.0 L/100 km). It uses 135 Wh/km (21.7 kW·h/100 mi, 13.5 kW·h/100 km or 490 kJ/km) battery-to-wheel, and has an efficiency of 88% on average.[13]

Source: Wikipedia

edited 12th Oct '11 11:25:04 PM by Balmung

deathjavu This foreboding is fa... from The internet, obviously Since: Feb, 2010
This foreboding is fa...
#35: Oct 12th 2011 at 11:30:02 PM

[up][up]One would assume that the more efficient batteries of the future necessary for electric cars would also be lighter.

Probably.

Also, the statistic I heard was effectively 1/3 the level of emissions from cars as from central generation, even if all the central generation plants were coal fired plants. I have no idea where I read that or how long ago, so a mountain of salt should be taken.

[up]

According to the U.S. EPA, the Roadster can travel 244 miles (393 km) on a single charge[12] of its lithium-ion battery pack, and can accelerate from 0 to 60 mph (0 to 97 km/h) in 3.7 or 3.9 seconds depending on the model. The Roadster's efficiency, as of September 2008, was reported as 120 mpgge (2.0 L/100 km). It uses 135 Wh/km (21.7 kW·h/100 mi, 13.5 kW·h/100 km or 490 kJ/km) battery-to-wheel, and has an efficiency of 88% on average.[13]
Do want. Do want.

Someone here in town drives a Roadster, somewhat odd considering how small it is. I can only assume they're a former graduate making mad $$$ as an Engineer.

Lucky bastard.

edited 12th Oct '11 11:34:47 PM by deathjavu

Look, you can't make me speak in a logical, coherent, intelligent bananna.
Joesolo Indiana Solo Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Indiana Solo
#36: Oct 13th 2011 at 7:01:24 AM

[up] Nice. The Tesla's are my favorite EV out now. The others are alright, but its the coolest out.

I'm baaaaaaack
Pykrete NOT THE BEES from Viridian Forest Since: Sep, 2009
NOT THE BEES
#38: Oct 13th 2011 at 3:31:44 PM

One would assume that the more efficient batteries of the future necessary for electric cars would also be lighter.

Probably.

Miniaturizing moving components is one thing. Miniaturizing energy density (physical property) is quite another.

Joesolo Indiana Solo Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Indiana Solo
#39: Oct 13th 2011 at 4:20:15 PM

[up][up] More like widespread electric cars!

edited 13th Oct '11 4:21:02 PM by Joesolo

I'm baaaaaaack
deathjavu This foreboding is fa... from The internet, obviously Since: Feb, 2010
This foreboding is fa...
#40: Oct 13th 2011 at 6:14:05 PM

[up][up] Increasing the energy density is exactly what they're trying to do with battery technology.

I don't understand what you're saying. That batteries can't increase in energy density?

Batteries increasing in energy density has been one of the primary advances in the field of miniaturizing electronic devices. There have been and there almost certainly will continue to be advances in that field.

Lithium Ion batteries. Need I say more?

edited 13th Oct '11 6:14:33 PM by deathjavu

Look, you can't make me speak in a logical, coherent, intelligent bananna.
Balmung Since: Oct, 2011
#41: Oct 13th 2011 at 6:20:02 PM

That's what they're using. Thing is, they make more and more heat when they discharge, which is also a problem.

edited 13th Oct '11 6:22:05 PM by Balmung

Pykrete NOT THE BEES from Viridian Forest Since: Sep, 2009
NOT THE BEES
#42: Oct 13th 2011 at 11:39:14 PM

[up][up] Of course they're doing what they can (and lithium ion has terrible energy density — it's one of the reasons I brought up the VB2 cell earlier [1]). Just saying that it's a task rather less simple than miniaturizing a macroscopic object, because the target characteristics are already taking place on a molecular level.

edited 13th Oct '11 11:39:36 PM by Pykrete

Joesolo Indiana Solo Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Indiana Solo
#43: Oct 14th 2011 at 12:29:03 PM

[up][up] Why not use that heat to heat the inside of the car? that way it's not an issue.

I'm baaaaaaack
deathjavu This foreboding is fa... from The internet, obviously Since: Feb, 2010
This foreboding is fa...
#44: Oct 14th 2011 at 4:44:46 PM

[up][up] Li Ion batteries were an improvement over the Ni Cd batteries that had come before in terms of energy density, which was my point- they can and have improved energy density drastically in the recent past.

There are so many companies gunning for better batteries every day I have no doubt they'll find viable, superior improvements/alternatives to L Ion soon enough. I mean, they've already found superior energy density, they just need to make it viable for use.

Look, you can't make me speak in a logical, coherent, intelligent bananna.
RocketDude Face Time from AZ, United States Since: May, 2009
Face Time
#45: Oct 14th 2011 at 5:03:12 PM

^^Probably because EV batteries are large things. Plus, the heating probably isn't as efficient.

"Hipsters: the most dangerous gang in the US." - Pacific Mackerel
Balmung Since: Oct, 2011
#46: Oct 14th 2011 at 7:22:45 PM

[up][up][up]Also because overheated batteries can catch fire or explode, so you need a means to cool them, especially if you get into much higher energy densities than lithium-ion and lithium-polymer batteries.

Joesolo Indiana Solo Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Indiana Solo
#47: Oct 15th 2011 at 2:26:27 PM

They have cooling systems in most. I know the chevy volt does. It'd be good to use that heat instead of just putting it out.

I'm baaaaaaack
RocketDude Face Time from AZ, United States Since: May, 2009
Face Time
#48: Oct 21st 2011 at 10:04:30 PM

Oh yeah, this video mentions the documentary Revenge of the Electric Car, the sequel to Who Killed the Electric Car?

Specifically, the guy in the video, Leo Parente, talks about how auto brands disconnect performance from pushing this kind of tech. The gripe he has is that there are electric and hybrid race cars such as the electric LMP-1 car in development.

Felt like mentioning this.

edited 21st Oct '11 10:04:45 PM by RocketDude

"Hipsters: the most dangerous gang in the US." - Pacific Mackerel
GreatLich Since: Jun, 2009
#49: Oct 22nd 2011 at 3:05:11 PM

Guess what car will be going electric?!

http://laughingsquid.com/electric-delorean-to-be-released-in-2013/

The fusion powered version will be a little while longer it seems.

USAF713 I changed accounts. from the United States Since: Sep, 2010
I changed accounts.
#50: Oct 22nd 2011 at 3:12:19 PM

[up] Oh ma gawd I want it. 0_0

I am now known as Flyboy.

Total posts: 4,684
Top