Does it matter, say, that someone writes a town that could never actually economically last?
It depends on the work. If the story involves the world (say the story's got a political edge to it) then an economically plausible town would really help. Otherwise, if the town's just a backdrop, then it doesn't really matter that much.
Does it matter, say, that every town has an inn, even though it makes no logical sense?
There's probably at least one inn in just about every town in America. It'd be weird if there was separate lodging in like every little village and hamlet in a rather low-tech world, though.
Is a book still just as good, even if the superficial details are all that's really touched upon in a world, and even then, don't always make sense?
Yes it is! I don't see why this question even needs to be asked. The setting doesn't have to be important for every single story.
Or is it a talent that must be honed, just as character and plot building must be honed?
If you're going to write about elaborate worlds, then you're going to have to hone that talent. If you're going to write elaborate plots, you're going to have to hone that talent, and so on. It depends on what you're focusing on.
What is the absolute minimum world building one can get away with?
Well, you need a place for your story to take place in, for starters, and then depending on how long your story is, you'll need just a touch of local color to make that setting come alive a little, so just some description when it's appropriate to elaborate on the surroundings of the characters. That, I feel, is the bare minimum.
When does it go from world building, to sheer obsessiveness / a vanity project?
When your name is JRR Tolkien.
Okay, just kidding—when world-building gets in the way of your personal life and it's all you ever think about.
edited 28th Sep '11 12:49:46 AM by annebeeche
Banned entirely for telling FE that he was being rude and not contributing to the discussion. I shall watch down from the goon heavens.On The Simpsons the geography and economics of Springfield make little sense (it's a small town, yet is home to numerous world-famous celebrities and headquarters of international corporations; has only one road out of town in one episode yet has more in others; is bordered by Maine and Nevada simultaneously), but no one seems to mind so long as it's funny.
Quit the condescension. Just because something is obvious to you does not mean it's obvious to everyone else.
Read my stories!Not a criticism of the methodology, because it can work wonderfully in some cases, but I just don't think it's quite the same thing as the Tolkien style I thought was being discussed.
The Revolution Will Not Be Tropeable
who is the author/verse' they are talking about the quote you quoted?
as of the 2nd of Nov. has 6 weeks for a broken collar bone to heal and types 1 handed and slowlyI'm the kind of person who'se liable to do worldbuilding purely for the sake of worldbuilding. I have two settings that I've thought up but haven't thought any stories to set into eighter one, and have done a lot more worldbuilding regarding the netherworld (which is seen in the first chapter and has little to no importance later) than the primary setting in Forgotten Lore (because the primary setting is "like reality exept when not" so I don't really need to come up with many details, while with the netherworld I had to come up with what the place is like and how it works, even if it's largely indifferent to the plot).
I am not trying to be condescending.
You've been sarcastic and almost rude towards me multiple times recently. Have I been rude to you before? If so, then I apologize. There is no need to be sarcastic and confrontational, however, regardless of whatever I may have done in the past. That is either holding a grudge, or giving the appearance of holding a grudge, and neither is going to help you or me.
Why don't we both take a deep breath and start afresh before either of us gets upset?
Banned entirely for telling FE that he was being rude and not contributing to the discussion. I shall watch down from the goon heavens.If you are not trying to be condescending, kindly do not dismiss my questions. No one likes to be told "this discussion doesn't matter, this is a not an issue worth asking, why would you ask that" etc. etc.
edited 28th Sep '11 2:33:05 PM by MrAHR
Read my stories!Okay, I'll try to refrain from that.
I just have difficulty wrapping my head around the belief that every story requires detailed and in-depth world building in order to be good, because every story is different—some will need good world building if that's what the story focuses on, and others won't.
Banned entirely for telling FE that he was being rude and not contributing to the discussion. I shall watch down from the goon heavens.All stories require a world to be set in, not all need a world fully fleshed out before they are written.
"Atheism is the religion whose followers are easiest to troll"Jason: China Mieville, author of Perdido Street Station (a work of his that I've heard of) and something called Embassytown (a work of his that I haven't).
He's been on my to-read list for a while, as I understand his genre of preference is something like Urban Fantasy Kitchen Sink Cosmic Horror Story (like a few other works that I enjoyed because of their similar qualities); any works that prominently feature Genre Kitchen Sink / Planet Eris / World of Chaos are going to feature that kind of 'jigsaw worldbuilding' - it's practically part of the appeal. And at any rate it's not the same kind of worldbuilding as I thought was under discussion.
The Revolution Will Not Be TropeableWorldbuilding isn't always required. I am perfectly capable of reading something like Harry Potter which runs into all kinds of little inconsistencies as the story builds and enjoying it; I don't have the compulsive need to nitpick, or at least where I do nitpick I don't let it ruin my enjoyment of the story. On the other hand, a well-thought-out and deep world adds quite a bit to a work; that's at least half the appeal of Lord Of The Rings to me, and that's easily on my top ten things I've ever read.
Personally, I really like worldbuilding; it's fun. Most of my actual worldbuilding is in stories that have nothing written for them yet, so it's basically just a mental exercise, but it's a fun mental exercise. (On the other hand, the only thing I actually have a decent chunk of written right now is a Naruto fic, and I keep having to retcon things as I make decisions about how I'm spinning the Narutoverse. It doesn't help that it's a serial format and I'm morally opposed to Orwellian Retcons.)
Shinigan (Naruto fanfic)I've managed to do a project where worldbuilding for it is not enjoyable. It's rather odd, actually.
Mostly because none of it is extraneous, so I have to figure out how to weave all of it in. It's also recent history, so it has to be minutely detailed. It's turning out to be a lot more of a nightmare than I'd hoped it would be...
I am now known as Flyboy.Yeah...I have a fic idea that I've been procrastinating on because it's so much bloody work, mostly doing research to actually figure out what major cities in Japan are like, and partly trying to integrate ninjas into the modern world under The Masquerade. Of course, it doesn't help that I'm just starting college and simultaneously working on another fic, but you know.
Shinigan (Naruto fanfic)putting your ninjas in your hometown would solve a lot of problems. :)
www.kingdomsofevil.com http://bensen-daniel.deviantart.com/ https://twitter.com/bensen_m
I have to qualify that: getting bogged down in world building when you plan to write a story in that world is bad, yes, but world building for its own sake - something never meant to be a story - can be fun and interesting.