Follow TV Tropes

Following

Needs Help: Hollywood Thin

Go To

captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
#1: Sep 6th 2011 at 4:13:47 AM

There needs to be more to this page, than tropers pointing out thin actress.

peccantis Since: Oct, 2010
#2: Sep 6th 2011 at 12:00:18 PM

I suppose it tries to say something like "skinniness directly associated with being healthy and wholesome, and being a requisite to being attractive". But yes, it mostly reads as a laundry list of slender actresses.

raisingirl83 Since: Aug, 2010
#3: Sep 6th 2011 at 5:05:02 PM

It's a Useful Note, or a casting trope.

There is a narrative trope here, the concept that Beauty Equals Thinness, or maybe Thinness Equals Goodness (maybe as a sub-trope of Beauty Equals Goodness) but that would require a rename. In either case the article would need a rewrite outlining the positive associations our culture makes with thinness, and the way that in order to be considered truly beautiful by mainstream standards a woman must also be thin, and therefore the way that beautiful and good people in narratives are generally portrayed as thin, and especially that female characters who are presented as beautiful are generally presented as being thin. The Thinness Equals Goodness trope also covers the negative assumptions that get made about people who aren't thin - that they're lazy, unhealthy, greedy - as well as the positive assumptions made about thin people - that they're healthy, motivated and "good". It's common in narratives to see fat people portrayed with the above negative stereotypes, common enough that when they're portrayed positively it makes a fairly noticeable exception.

Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#4: Sep 7th 2011 at 2:23:50 PM

Should we start by cleaning out all the examples that don't refer to thinness? Those ones about overly muscular guys or about generally attractive people?

raisingirl83 Since: Aug, 2010
#5: Sep 7th 2011 at 4:26:05 PM

Depends, I think, on whether a consensus is reached whether the actual trope being referenced here - the one that 'Hollywood Thin' plays to - is 'Beauty Equals Thinness' or 'Thinness Equals Goodness' or, I guess more specifically 'Female Beauty Equals Thinness' (which cuts out the examples of men being chiselled and muscley, etc).

edited 7th Sep '11 4:28:31 PM by raisingirl83

DoktorvonEurotrash Since: Jan, 2001
#6: Sep 8th 2011 at 1:32:43 AM

[up]What you're describing sounds like a trope all right, but the article already describes a very different trope: the tendency of live-action works to present underweight women as beautiful and healthy. Should this exist?

Insignificant Since: Dec, 1969
#7: Oct 16th 2011 at 2:28:37 PM

This is Not A Trope. It's a stealth rant. Cut it.

Gillespie Talkative Loon from Western Canada Since: Sep, 2011
#8: Oct 16th 2011 at 2:54:27 PM

Oh wow, those male examples have no business being here. Number one, muscled does not equal thin in any way - the description even says that non-beefcake guys are seen as scrawny and weak, i.e. thin guys. Second, men in media are allowed more variety of body-shapes for different roles while women are not, though this is a debatable and charged statement.

Cut the complaining and male examples, see if it can be salvaged and objective.

[The rest was unintelligible.]
captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
#9: Oct 18th 2011 at 5:16:02 AM

[up] Even if we got rid of the complaining and the muscular men, we'd still be left with a page that's essentially a list of thin women. There's trope to be had about thinness being treated as beautiful but that's a storytelling trope which is far removed what from what this page is supposed to be.

There's nothing here to salvage.

edited 23rd Oct '11 5:27:51 AM by captainpat

captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
#10: Oct 23rd 2011 at 5:39:30 AM

alright crowner's hooked

captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
#11: Oct 23rd 2011 at 6:08:11 AM

Hold on. Is Hollywood Thin actually casting-speak? Like a phrase people making the casting decisions actually use.

edited 23rd Oct '11 6:10:05 AM by captainpat

Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#12: Oct 23rd 2011 at 6:30:11 AM

The phrase is out there. People uses it here. Some other mentions here. here, here and here.

captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
#13: Oct 23rd 2011 at 6:33:43 AM

[up] But that doesn't seem like industry cast speak. Least something people on the production side would use.

Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#14: Oct 23rd 2011 at 6:52:25 AM

Yeah, maybe not. I only heard it was on some discussion here.

captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
#15: Oct 26th 2011 at 5:58:16 AM

[up] Yea, well tropers have a bad habit of assuming things about the production side of works. If this phrase does get use a lot in magazines or tabloids then there may be a case for that.

Gillespie Talkative Loon from Western Canada Since: Sep, 2011
#16: Oct 26th 2011 at 10:00:07 AM

The tabloids aren't as official as the industry itself, but they reflect the accepted norms - if they didn't, they wouldn't sell umpteen copies a day. Tabloids are very persuasive to a certain demographic and how these celebrities are perceived.

I don't think there needs to be examples but this is a phenomenon, namely that very thin and narrow (female) characters are not only healthy and desirable but much more common than in real life. The hypocrasy here is that with rising overweight/obesity rates in North America, the beauty industry/film industry is still hell-bent on using thinner and thinner models and passing them off as normal and non-Photoshopped.

[The rest was unintelligible.]
Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#17: Oct 26th 2011 at 10:12:17 AM

I think we can define the phenomenon term without turning it into too much of a rant. (Why is it hypocritical for Hollywood to push thinness when obesity rates are rising?)

edited 26th Oct '11 10:29:15 AM by Routerie

DoktorvonEurotrash Since: Jan, 2001
#18: Oct 26th 2011 at 10:17:00 AM

Why is obesity even pertinent when discussing weight obsession and undereating?

Gillespie Talkative Loon from Western Canada Since: Sep, 2011
#19: Oct 26th 2011 at 10:19:08 AM

Eh, ok, hypocrisy is probably the wrong word. It's in bad faith anyway, but I can withdraw some of that as not being especially pertinent.

edited 26th Oct '11 10:20:55 AM by Gillespie

[The rest was unintelligible.]
Insignificant Since: Dec, 1969
#20: Oct 26th 2011 at 10:21:29 AM

Why should we have an article on this? It's not a trope of any kind. Just a criticism of Hollywood's thinness standards. Not exactly unwarranted, but still just a criticism. We won't be missing anything by not having an article about this.

edited 26th Oct '11 10:21:58 AM by Insignificant

captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
MetaFour Since: Jan, 2001
#22: Oct 28th 2011 at 7:08:05 PM

Five days, 2:1 ratio in favor of cutting. Calling this.

Let's remove the wicks, then we can cut it.

edited 28th Oct '11 7:09:47 PM by MetaFour

MegaJ Since: Oct, 2009
#23: Oct 28th 2011 at 8:01:04 PM

Ick, sad this will be gone. At least it can be a casting page...and isnt Hollywood Pudgy The Same Yet Fatter? But it has a lot of support (compared to this page) to involve actually cutting that page? Leaves a bad taste in my mouth...

edited 28th Oct '11 8:03:05 PM by MegaJ

Arha Since: Jan, 2010
#24: Oct 28th 2011 at 8:05:55 PM

Removed the examples. Or about half anyway since someone, probably Camacan, already got them.

Camacan from Australiatown Since: Jan, 2001

Total posts: 44
Top