Follow TV Tropes

Following

Marvel Cinematic Universe

Go To

Welcome to the main discussion thread for the Marvel Cinematic Universe! I'm editing this OP and pinning it to establish some basic guidelines. All of the Media Forum rules still apply.

  • This thread is for talking about the live-action films, TV shows, animated works, and related content that use the Marvel brand, currently owned by Disney.
  • While mild digressions are okay, discussion of the comic books should go in this thread. Extended digressions may be thumped as off-topic.
  • Spoilers for new releases should not be discussed for at least two weeks. Rather, each title should have a dedicated thread where that sort of conversation is held. We can mention new releases in a general sense, but please be courteous to people who don't want to be spoiled.

[Edited by Fighteer]

    Original post 
Since Thor and now Captain America came out this year, I wanted to get what Tropers thought of the concept and execution of the Marvel Cinematic Universe in general. Personally I love the idea and wonder why this idea hasn't been seriously tried before. It sorta seems to me like the DCAU in movie form (And well, ummm, with Marvel), and really 'gets' the comic book feel of a shared universe while not being completely alienating.

Edited by Fighteer on Dec 15th 2022 at 9:55:58 AM

kalel94 Rascal King from Dragonstone Since: Feb, 2011
Rascal King
#2101: Oct 9th 2012 at 9:19:27 AM

Jim Caviezel for Doctor Strange. Just watch him in Count of Monte Cristo, he'd be perfect.

The last hurrah? Nah, I'd do it again.
Maridee from surfside Since: Nov, 2009 Relationship Status: Dating Catwoman
#2102: Oct 9th 2012 at 9:44:16 AM

Naveen Andrews?

ophelia, you're breaking my heart
comicwriter Since: Sep, 2011
#2103: Oct 13th 2012 at 1:00:58 PM

At NYCC Joe Quesada says he's involved in a project on the "West Coast" (all the film development happens there, the comic stuff happens in NYC) and that there have been little hints and leaks, but no official announcement.

Assuming it is indeed film related, I'm thinking we may get confirmation on the prospects of a Black Panther or Doctor Strange film soon enough.

wanderlustwarrior Role Model from Where Gods Belong Since: Jun, 2009 Relationship Status: What's love got to do with it?
Role Model
#2104: Oct 13th 2012 at 1:33:37 PM

Oh, the Big Cheese. Maybe it's something One More Day based. Have the comic fans let him live that down?

So a Halloween store had a commercial come up. TO my pleasant surprise, there was a Boys' Hawkeye costume. There wasn't a Black Widow costume in the commercial, but there was... a... Girl's Captain America costume?

I wonder how Hawkeye might've been received if he kept the shades on in the movie?

How are they talking to each other? Especially Cap, who settles for a knife hand when he remembers he doesn't have an ear piece.

edited 13th Oct '12 1:36:38 PM by wanderlustwarrior

The sad, REAL American dichotomy
comicwriter Since: Sep, 2011
#2105: Oct 13th 2012 at 1:56:09 PM

whoah. Big spoilers out of NYCC, relating to the Avengers and the SHIELD TV show.

Coulson's death has been retconned and he's going to be the lead character in the SHIELD series. They mentioned the UK edit where the blood was removed and all that.

wanderlustwarrior Role Model from Where Gods Belong Since: Jun, 2009 Relationship Status: What's love got to do with it?
Role Model
#2106: Oct 13th 2012 at 2:00:39 PM

Read the spoiler, since I kinda figured what it was. So... for them to retcon it, they'd have to confirm it was a death... Also, it's kind of a damn shame, because I was going to do a post of the pros and cons of him being The Vision.

The sad, REAL American dichotomy
BornIn1142 from Estonia Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Faithful to 2D
#2107: Oct 13th 2012 at 2:04:59 PM

[up][up]Not what I'd call a retcon. The death was meant to be somewhat ambiguous in the first place, and didn't Whedon or Feige confirm the survival while the movie was still in theaters?

JRPictures Since: Nov, 2010
#2108: Oct 13th 2012 at 3:56:14 PM

[up][up]

Why do people want Coulson to be Vision? I can't see it. For starters if we're to introduce Vision, we'd need to present Ant-Man and then Ultron. I just don't see how this works.

WarriorEowyn from Victoria Since: Oct, 2010
#2109: Oct 13th 2012 at 4:09:18 PM

It's not a retcon. It's not even a huge surprise I was sure they were going to bring him back from the second he "died". It's a comic book movie, we don't even see him dead, and it's flat-own shown that Fury was lying about his death in at least some respects. In a franchise where "falling into an endless abyss" can be written off as non-fatal without even an explanation, that works out to "definitely still alive". Add to that the fact that the author had more or less outright stated that he was coming back... Plus, he was added to Marvel Comics shortly before the move came out, and they wouldn't have bothered with that if the film was just going to kill him off.

wanderlustwarrior Role Model from Where Gods Belong Since: Jun, 2009 Relationship Status: What's love got to do with it?
Role Model
#2110: Oct 13th 2012 at 4:13:19 PM

[up][up] Maybe Pym's so much of a fuck-up that he's preemptively fucking things up.

So, if Coulson was The Vision...
Pros:

  • Audiences (myself included) would be introduced to a new character, potentially making them more popular.
  • We'd get to see a new moveset onscreen
  • We get to see Coulson (in a sense) fight
  • SCARLET WITCH!
Cons:
  • Coulson wouldn't wholly be Coulson.

[down]Right. But the SON OF COUL not being entirely himself is such a major con anyway.

edited 13th Oct '12 4:24:17 PM by wanderlustwarrior

The sad, REAL American dichotomy
BornIn1142 from Estonia Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Faithful to 2D
#2111: Oct 13th 2012 at 4:20:37 PM

[up]...and the Vision wouldn't wholly be the Vision?

comicwriter Since: Sep, 2011
#2112: Oct 13th 2012 at 4:50:22 PM

The only reason I would've been okay with Vision/Coulson is because it'd be hard to do a comic-accurate origin for the character since they haven't introduced Wonder Man. His entire origin revolved around being brought to life by Ultron using Wonder Man's brainwaves on his robot. I would've been cool with Coulson taking Wonder Man's place in that scenario.

But to be honest there are plenty of other characters I'd rather see before Vision anyway, so hopefully they can introduce some other Avengers.

imadinosaur Since: Oct, 2011
#2113: Oct 14th 2012 at 3:56:43 AM

If you want, you can say it isn't a retcon (though it totally is); either way it's hilarious to see all the lame Comic Book Death shit bubbling through to the movie franchise.

Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
BornIn1142 from Estonia Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Faithful to 2D
#2114: Oct 14th 2012 at 5:57:12 AM

Do you literally not know what a retcon is?

imadinosaur Since: Oct, 2011
#2115: Oct 14th 2012 at 7:48:35 AM

The main point is that it's incredibly lame nerd-pandering.

I guess going LOL NOPE HE'S REALLY ALIVE isn't technically a retcon, but it's definitely in that spirit.

Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
metaphysician Since: Oct, 2010
#2116: Oct 14th 2012 at 9:10:16 AM

Its hardly pandering to the comic nerds when Coulson was broadly popular with the general audience. And frankly, the movie *itself* dropped major suggestions that maybe he wasn't dead; even if it wasn't the initial intention, they clearly left themselves enough leeway in Avengers to decide otherwise without actually having to retcon anything.

Home of CBR Rumbles-in-Exile: rumbles.fr.yuku.com
wanderlustwarrior Role Model from Where Gods Belong Since: Jun, 2009 Relationship Status: What's love got to do with it?
Role Model
#2117: Oct 14th 2012 at 9:28:33 AM

Plus, they'd been saying "he's not going to die" even from before the movie released. Maybe lying creator, sure, but even in the scene itself, Coulson and Fury were discussing what they were best at, manipulation.

The sad, REAL American dichotomy
deathpigeon Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: One True Dodecahedron
#2118: Oct 14th 2012 at 9:30:13 AM

Plus, Joss Whedon did confirm that Nick Fury was lying when he said that Coulson died.

So let us review the facts here:

  • We saw Coulson get shot and seriously injured.
  • However, we never see him die, and a medical team is called.
  • We are told by Nick Fury, who is a spy and known to lie his ass off.
  • Coulson himself suggested to Nick Fury that he use this to get the team to work together more.
  • We have confirmation from the Writer/Director that he was lying his ass off.

Where's the Retcon, again?

edited 14th Oct '12 9:31:12 AM by deathpigeon

KnownUnknown Since: Jan, 2001
#2119: Oct 14th 2012 at 2:01:15 PM

Wait, nvm. I stand corrected.

edited 14th Oct '12 2:01:51 PM by KnownUnknown

"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.
comicwriter Since: Sep, 2011
#2120: Oct 15th 2012 at 10:30:08 AM

Ant-Man is officially scheduled for November, 2015. http://www.newsarama.com/film/disney-marvel-studios-ant-man-release-date.html

Curiously, that's several months AFTER Avengers 2.

KnownUnknown Since: Jan, 2001
#2121: Oct 15th 2012 at 11:28:45 AM

Perhaps Pym is introduced or has a major role in The Avengers 2 but doesn't actually deal with Ant-Man related shenanigans until his own movie.

"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.
comicwriter Since: Sep, 2011
#2122: Oct 15th 2012 at 11:51:58 AM

I'm still not sure Pym IS going to be the Ant-Man but yes, that'd be a logical way of doing it.

wanderlustwarrior Role Model from Where Gods Belong Since: Jun, 2009 Relationship Status: What's love got to do with it?
Role Model
#2123: Oct 15th 2012 at 1:12:55 PM

I rewatched Thor over the weekend and noticed some things:

  • If Pym was Selvig's colleague and they had dealings in the past, that indeed makes it likely Lang is the one who will be active.
  • I didn't notice the size of Sitwell's role on first watch. Maybe if he was actually named, he'd have stood out to me/audiences as the same character. Also, in the wake of The Consultant, those "sir"s stood out and made me feel a bit bad.
  • Thor and Jane had no chemistry at all. Thor had more even with Selvig, or especially with Sif in one scene in particular.

The sad, REAL American dichotomy
BornIn1142 from Estonia Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Faithful to 2D
#2124: Oct 15th 2012 at 1:21:08 PM

Disagreed to the max about chemistry. On Jane's part especially I felt the attraction came off really strongly. In fact, when the movie came out, I recall a bunch of people wondering whether Portman actually had a thing for Hemsworth because they didn't grasp the concept of "acting."

wanderlustwarrior Role Model from Where Gods Belong Since: Jun, 2009 Relationship Status: What's love got to do with it?
Role Model
#2125: Oct 15th 2012 at 1:33:13 PM

Oh there was physical attraction of course, but little romantic chemistry to justify that quick attachment, especially since he is just chivalrous like that anyway.

Oh, also, Loki's sexism in Avengers no longer felt out of nowhere.

The sad, REAL American dichotomy

Total posts: 168,382
Top