Follow TV Tropes

Following

Cleaning up the Laconic Wiki

Go To

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#26: Jul 26th 2011 at 8:22:17 PM

Hm, going down my list, Laconic.You Fail Gun Safety Forever might be bad. I think I just copied it over from somewhere else. I'll decap and shorten it.

Laconic.Juggling Loaded Guns was mostly a pothole definition, should I remove them?

I think Laconic.Splash Damage is good, if two sentences.

Laconic.Orion Drive is as blunt as I can make it, but I'm worried about misinterpretations.

Fight smart, not fair.
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#27: Jul 28th 2011 at 1:40:41 PM

Someone brought up that the Laconics of some of the Artistic License tropes consist of an all caps X DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY running gag. Should these all be removed?

Fight smart, not fair.
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#28: Jul 28th 2011 at 2:56:57 PM

They should certainly at least be changed to normal capitalization, but I'd say they're functional, barely.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#29: Jul 28th 2011 at 4:19:00 PM

I originally had a different one. When it got changed (I keep the pages I've launched Laconics on my watchlist) I pm'd the troper responsible. I don't know if they were the one who started it or what. Did you think mine was better?

Fight smart, not fair.
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#30: Jul 28th 2011 at 5:39:35 PM

I think yours is much better. I changed it back.

Simply Allcapping X DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY! doesn't really say what the trope is.

edited 28th Jul '11 5:44:53 PM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Camacan from Australiatown Since: Jan, 2001
#31: Jul 30th 2011 at 12:02:08 AM

How do people feel about links? I'm strongly of the view that they shouldn't be used in place of text. That is, a laconic should capture the trope by itself and the reader should not be required to go off to one or more other pages for it to make sense.

For example, Fight Off the Kryptonite:

This can't be read as a simple text description of the trope. Would forbidding that kind of thing make sense as a rule? (Not suggesting a rule against all potholes, just a rule against links-as-text-replacement.)

edited 30th Jul '11 12:10:55 AM by Camacan

Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#32: Jul 30th 2011 at 12:05:34 AM

If you cant read it without potholes then it shouldnt be like that. (Potholes are just for added effect and reference.

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#33: Jul 30th 2011 at 12:21:36 AM

Again, I'd rather not see it as a hard-and fast rule, my personal feeling is that, even more than the main pages, you should not have to follow potholes to understand. If it becomes possible to use the Laconics as mouseover text, they must be standalone.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Meeble likes the cheeses. from the ruins of Granseal Since: Aug, 2009
likes the cheeses.
#34: Aug 8th 2011 at 12:58:54 PM

If the mouse-over text has a character limit, is there any kind of mark-up we can use on longer laconic pages to cause the tool-tip to pull a shortened version?

Something like:

Laconic Page

Long winded but clear laconic entry.

[[Mouseover: Short, less clear, but gets close enough laconic entry]].

edited 8th Aug '11 12:59:38 PM by Meeble

Visit my contributor page to assist with the "I Like The Cheeses" project!
Chimaera Doctor Where Since: Aug, 2010
Doctor Where
#35: Aug 20th 2011 at 12:01:18 PM

I have two questions. 1. What should be done about tropes that are Exactly What It Says on the Tin? Should we just restate the title? 2. If a sentence in the Main sums up the trope very well, can we just put that on Laconic?

Well that was like playing a game of Whack-A-Mole where "mole" is defined as "Cthulhu". -Count Dorku
SpellBlade Since: Dec, 1969
troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#37: Aug 20th 2011 at 12:59:21 PM

[up][up] "Exactly What It Says on the Tin" is not a good Laconic, if that's what you're asking.

Rhymes with "Protracted."
Chimaera Doctor Where Since: Aug, 2010
Doctor Where
#38: Aug 23rd 2011 at 2:52:14 PM

I understand that Exactly What It Says on the Tin is a pointless laconic; I actually changed one of those. The kind of trope I'm thinking of is Dangerous 16th Birthday. The Laconic is "not-so-sweet sixteen," which is less clear than just the title.

Well that was like playing a game of Whack-A-Mole where "mole" is defined as "Cthulhu". -Count Dorku
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#39: Aug 23rd 2011 at 3:04:41 PM

Changed it to "Turning sixteen is a milestone. In these cases, it puts the character in danger."

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#40: Sep 3rd 2011 at 11:15:37 AM

Ptitles are done. All of them. Except the Everythings X snowclones, since that whole group is under TRS. Here are the ones I fixed:

Also had to add or modify a few others.

There's also this one. I just could not think of anything better, but it needs something.

Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go sleep for a week.

edited 3rd Sep '11 11:18:26 AM by Discar

SilentReverence adopting kitteh from 3 tiles right 1 tile up Since: Jan, 2010
adopting kitteh
#41: Sep 11th 2011 at 4:40:59 PM

I hope that "it has to be standalone" does not become a FE-whimmy rule to forbid all trope links in a Laconic. Cases like the above ("overcoming kryptonite factor with heroic willpower") are perfectly understandable with the links to the tropes in place, and that makes the laconic pretty laconic, not to mention concise and to the point. I mean, really people, we are an hypermedia resource.

Fanfic Recs orwellianretcon'd: cutlocked for committee or for Google?
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#42: Sep 11th 2011 at 4:46:31 PM

It needs to be clear without forcing a wikiwalk. If the tropes used in the laconic are all Exactly What It Says on the Tin, it's ok.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#43: Sep 11th 2011 at 4:54:40 PM

Yeah, there's a difference between:

"A form of Theme Naming based on flowers."

And:

"A Xanatos Gambit crossed with a Spanish Prisoner."

The first isn't really a big deal. The second makes you go on a wikiwalk to understand the trope.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
SilentReverence adopting kitteh from 3 tiles right 1 tile up Since: Jan, 2010
adopting kitteh
#44: Sep 11th 2011 at 11:02:28 PM

That's why I said "cases like the above", yeah. They are pretty obvious. I'm not asking to have "A Motor Mouth Lightning Bruiser Xanatos Speed Chesses a Lysistrata Gambit" for a laconical. I'm just fearing that... a certain someone, is gonna declare a war on potholes because of that.

EDIT: meh, try as I might I can't get where does the "i" in Lysistrata go right at first try...

edited 11th Sep '11 11:04:13 PM by SilentReverence

Fanfic Recs orwellianretcon'd: cutlocked for committee or for Google?
Camacan from Australiatown Since: Jan, 2001
#45: Oct 11th 2011 at 3:19:00 AM

Like Shima points out, our best trope names read like plain English in a sentence anyway so it's a non-issue there.

When the name isn't that good, cases where plain English equivalents are not practical are quite rare in practice. Potholing is inappropriate for laconics — it's a "subtext" that the reader might or might not access.

edited 11th Oct '11 3:23:52 AM by Camacan

Add Post

Total posts: 45
Top