Follow TV Tropes

Following

Rename: Fair Cop

Go To

nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#1: Jun 12th 2011 at 12:28:51 PM

So, as best I can tell, this got its name during the time when lousy puns were in vogue as trope names. I certainly can't see any other reason why this was named what it was - "fair cop" is an existing term more or less exactly what it sounds like - a reasonable police officer. I've stumbled across several wicks to this that mistake it for the existing term. Surely we can do better?

Zyffyr from Portland, Oregon Since: Apr, 2010 Relationship Status: Complex: I'm real, they are imaginary
#2: Jun 12th 2011 at 2:41:29 PM

Fair Cop found in: 278 articles, excluding discussions.

This title has brought 121 people to the wiki from non-search engine links since 20th FEB '09.

The usage on the page itself seems to be correct.

Just how frequently is it being misused elsewhere on the site?

halfmillennium Since: Dec, 1969
#3: Jun 12th 2011 at 3:39:26 PM

A 'fair cop' is, apparently, a justified capture for wrongdoing. So it's nothing to do with the trope, but it doesn't seem like a confusing title.

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#4: Jun 12th 2011 at 11:52:09 PM

It's one of those puns based on a turn of phrase.

Given I've heard fair used for both physically attractive and balanced when referring to a person, I'd like to see actual misusage count.

Fight smart, not fair.
Leaper Since: May, 2009
#5: Jun 12th 2011 at 11:55:38 PM

This is another one of those tropes named after a preexisting phrase, yet has nothing to do with said phrase, isn't it?

Joy.

nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#6: Jun 13th 2011 at 12:57:39 AM

[up][up][up]Didn't know that - I always thought it was an EWISOTT phrase. Still a bad name for this either way, though.

So, suggestions? I'm hoping for something a little more creative then Hot Cop, which is the first obvious choice.

Edit: I just noticed three Fetish Fuel pages listed on the usage page. Uh???

Will check wicks for misuse tomorrow.

edited 13th Jun '11 1:00:35 AM by nrjxll

halfmillennium Since: Dec, 1969
#7: Jun 13th 2011 at 4:52:06 AM

Most pages which were linked to from those ones do the same. The page was deleted, but presumably the links wren't.

Perhaps a crowner for whether or not to rename the page would be a good idea?

SeanMurrayI Since: Jan, 2010
#8: Jun 13th 2011 at 7:15:47 AM

Checking wicks at random for misuse...

Out of the first 25 wicks checked, so far, there are only two clear cases of misuse (and they're both on one page) and another that is likely to be incorrect. I'll check more later, but right now I don't think there is going to be enough misuse found to merit a name change.

edited 13th Jun '11 7:25:18 AM by SeanMurrayI

Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#9: Jun 19th 2011 at 10:53:13 AM

Bump. Low misuse. I kinda hate the name, but we can't change it if its being used correctly.

We done?

Add Post

Total posts: 9
Top