Follow TV Tropes

Following

Trope Decay: Plot Tumor

Go To

Ghilz Perpetually Confused from Yeeted at Relativistic Velocities Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Perpetually Confused
#1: Jun 3rd 2011 at 1:10:14 PM

Plot Tumor is supposed to be "A single plot element enjoyed by fans or writers swells in importance, crowding out everything else in its story."

A lot of the examples however seem to confuse this for Flanderization, Power Creep Seep or whatever Bad Writing the editor could not find a page to fit it in. And I am not even going to cover the natter problems.

Some examples of bad examples on the very page itself:

  • Doctor Who has a couple of examples.
    • The Cybermen's allergy to gold went from "could be choked by powdered gold dust" to "tossing a gold coin at them is like shooting Kryptonite bullets". When the new series reintroduced them, this tumor was quietly excised (Technically, they're not the same enemies).
    • In the sonic screwdriver's original appearance in Fury from the Deep, and later in The War Games, it was used for unscrewing things. It only gradually became a do-anything device.
      • It was actually written out of the show because it was becoming a Deus ex Machina, before being reintroduced for the Eighth Doctor.

Neither strike me as valid examples.

  • Star Trek
    • The Jefferies Tubes started out as fairly realistic maintenance tunnels that the odd tool or piece of equipment were in. This is realistic because sometimes with complicated engineering not everything is within arm's reach. These mutated over generations to labyrinths of tubes where everything important was kept - Fair to say no engineer would design something this malevolent.

    • The Borg started out as technophiles who were only interested in stealing interesting technology and ignored life forms unless they became a danger, but they gradually mutated into Night of the Living Dead-style zombies. The first trip aboard a Borg Cube showed that Borg reproduced naturally and put implants into their infants. Meanwhile Picard was chosen to become Locutus as a mouthpiece for the Borg to announce their intention to conquer and enslave humanity. By First Contact, they were able to assimilate on the fly, injecting nanites directly into people to begin the assimilation process (though full assimilation was more involved). By the time Voyager encountered them, they were primarily interested in assimilating life forms regardless of their technological level, and eventually the Borg were revealed to be unable to actually understand anything without assimilating it.
    • The Vulcans have also gone through this. One of the complaints about the Vulcans on Enterprise was that they were portrayed as capable of deceit and underhanded behavior, the complaints arising because people took one character, Spock, who was in fact notably atypical, and used him as the archetype for an entire species. However, when you look at how Vulcans were portrayed in the canon (Star Trek V does not exist) you saw Vulcans acting in quite un-Spockish ways, even as far back as his "wife" in the original series who manipulated things to get out of her arranged marriage.

Pretty sure the two race examples are either race-wide flanderization or Villain Decay / Motive Decay.

I could go on, but there's clearly a problem with this page.

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#2: Jun 4th 2011 at 9:46:51 AM

Unfortunately, people named the trope after an illness.

Fight smart, not fair.
MangaManiac Since: Aug, 2010
#3: Nov 2nd 2011 at 2:25:34 PM

Bump. Is there still a problem with this?

DarkNemesis Since: Aug, 2010
#4: Nov 3rd 2011 at 4:31:01 PM

As a wise man once said "When the trope description doesn't match the examples, you expand the description".

I edited the description to make it more clear its about the plot growing in size rather than "crowding out other plots" since that seemed way too negative and its why the other plot tumor tropes are subjective.

MetaFour Since: Jan, 2001
#5: Nov 3rd 2011 at 5:58:29 PM

Sometimes examples that don't fit the definition are just bad examples, nothing more. If there's some sort of consistent pattern to the examples that don't fit, then maybe they're a sign that the description should be changed. Or maybe they're a sign that the trope in question has a supertrope and we lack an article describing it.

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#6: Nov 3rd 2011 at 6:06:59 PM

^^ Hell, no. When the description starts chasing the examples, the loop goes 'round and 'round, never stopping.

Clarify the description to eliminate a class of examples. Never expand the description to include more.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#7: Nov 3rd 2011 at 8:38:19 PM

^^^When did any wise man ever say that?

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#8: Nov 3rd 2011 at 10:31:11 PM

It tends to very greatly, namely if someone builds a trope that is A) a specific subset of a trope we don't have B) given a too broad name C) collecting examples of the name, we expand the trope, because the original writer was most likely building the trope page around some examples they had in their head (but aren't actually important to the trope itself).

Fight smart, not fair.
DarkNemesis Since: Aug, 2010
#9: Nov 4th 2011 at 2:15:22 PM

Routerie, that was hyperbole/sarcasm.

Are there any examples in the trope where the plot specifically "crowds out other plots"? The vast majority of examples I can find relate to overarching stories of a series or fictional universe, which means it would be hard to find examples where it "crowded out other plots" since, unless it became the basis of every new story in the series, there's always going to be room for whatever plots are available. That's why I retooled the definition to suggest the aspect is something that gets linked to other plots it wasn't conceived for instead of crowding them out. The Yu-Gi-Oh example would be one where duel monsters become the entire premise but even that one never specifically illustrates what plots got sidelined to make room for it.

JapaneseTeeth Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing from Meinong's jungle Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing
#10: Nov 4th 2011 at 2:20:43 PM

For my money, I'm not sure if "crowding out other plots" is the best way to phrase it. It's more like "a minor element of the story expands in importance until it dominates the plot". The element in question doesn't necessarily need to be a plotline itself.

Reaction Image Repository
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#11: Nov 4th 2011 at 2:59:03 PM

Well, when it crowds out other plots, wouldn't it be either Tone Shift or Genre Shift?

Fight smart, not fair.
DarkNemesis Since: Aug, 2010
#12: Nov 4th 2011 at 6:01:45 PM

a minor element of the story expands in importance
Which is the operating definition of Plot Tumor
until it dominates the plot

Where exactly would the line be? A good number of the examples are about minor plot points that got turned into major fixtures of the work in question but they didn't necessarily become the focus of the main plots, although they might get "iterations" in the work (especially if its Expanded Universe material) where it is the focus of the plot.

edited 4th Nov '11 6:04:32 PM by DarkNemesis

shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#13: Nov 5th 2011 at 3:13:42 PM

[up][up] Not if it's the same tone and genre as the other plots which a good number of them are. It's just a shift in focus. Not a shift in the tone or genre.

edited 5th Nov '11 3:14:11 PM by shimaspawn

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#14: Nov 6th 2011 at 7:43:04 PM

Wouldn't a shift toward romance be a genre shift if it wasn't a romance to begin with?

Fight smart, not fair.
Myra Since: Oct, 2011
#15: Feb 4th 2012 at 9:08:29 AM

I agree that the examples and possibly wicks need cleaning up, but otherwise there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with the trope.

Feather7603 Devil's Advocate from Yggdrasil Since: Dec, 2011
#16: Feb 4th 2012 at 9:21:34 AM

[up][up] Is that a Romantic Plot Tumor you're hinting at?

I don't think the trope is wrong, nor the name. Cleanup is all that's needed.

The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.
troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#17: Feb 6th 2012 at 11:18:09 AM

[up] I agree.

Rhymes with "Protracted."
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#18: Feb 6th 2012 at 8:35:51 PM

Plot and genre aren't quite the same thing.

Fight smart, not fair.
Feather7603 Devil's Advocate from Yggdrasil Since: Dec, 2011
#19: Feb 7th 2012 at 9:30:56 AM

[up] I wasn't sure if you meant an overall shift of the entire series towards romance, or just for a certain prominent couple.

The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.
Add Post

Total posts: 19
Top