Useful Notes: Iran–Iraq War
The land itself bleeds and so do we, but we fight on, this land is ours and ours alone.The original Gulf War note , in spite of its fury and length, has largely been passed over by world media, and indeed works set in it are rare these days outside of Iran. (Iraq, for understandable reasons, doesn't have much of a film industry.) For later installments of "Persian Gulf War", see the Gulf War and the The War on Terror.
Iran-Iraq rivalry, the Islamic Revolution and Saddam's ambitionsMuch of the Middle East was drawn up arbitrarily in the aftermath of World War One by the allies, Iraq itself was created by Britain out of the ruins of a large chunk of the Ottoman Empire. The new territory was majority Shi'ite, the majority denomination in Iran, and included territories that Iran claimed for itself; however, the new territory had to be given to the Sunni Prince Faisal of Hejaz, to whom Britain had promised Syria and then stood idly by when France conquered it from him. The prince proceeded to pack the Iraqi elite with fellow Sunnis, to Iran's dismay. Iran also included territories claimed by Iraq, notably the oil-rich Khuzestan—part of which was a majority-Arab that had even previously been called "Arabstan" for quite some time.note Iraq and Iran both supported insurgent groups in each others' territories. The border dispute remains unsolved to this day. Ironically, in 1978, it was Iranian spies that informed Saddam Hussein (then vice-president) of a pro-Soviet coup plot, allowing Saddam to initiate a purge and solidify his position. Ties between the countries briefly improve. In 1979, the Islamic revolution occurred in Iran. The pro-U.S. monarchy was overthrown and replaced by a new theocratic state. In Iraq, Saddam Hussein took over the office of President. Over the next two years, ties between the two countries deteriorated. By 1980 Saddam was actively incorporating allusions of the Islamic conquest of Iran centuries ago. Iran denounced the Iraqi regime as a "Puppet of Satan" (please recall that the Islamic Republic called the United States the "Great Satan" and Israel the "Little Satan." Make of that what you will). Iran was in turmoil by 1980: its army was purged by the mullahs, the U.S. suspended the supply of spare parts and its air force was crippled. The new regime sidelined the traditional military in favor of new, ideologically motivated militias, such as the Pasdaran—"The Revolutionary Guards." Iraq was convinced that the Iranian population hated the new regime. When numerous Iranian officials from the Shah's regime fled to Iraq, Saddam believed that the weak Islamic regime would collapse easily. He believed that a military invasion would spark a new revolution which would overthrow Khomeini and install a government that would be subservient to Iraq interests. The Iranian embassy in London was attacked by Iraqi-sponsored terrorists. A series of terrorist incidents in Iraq culminated with the failed assassination attempt of its foreign minister. In September 1980, Iraq invaded.
1980-82: Invasion and Counter-OffensiveThe Iraq invasion plan called for a series of preemptive airstrikes to cripple the Iranian Air Force, followed up by a ground assault by nine divisions to seize Khuzestan and passes in the Zagros Mountains. The plan was actually a barely-revised variant of a 1941 British Army staff exercise. The war began on September 22 when Iraqi jets began their strikes on Iranian air bases. This air offensive, however, turned out to be a failure, as Iraqi intelligence was out of date and their pilots lacked the training in air to ground operations. Many of the Iraqi attacks were highly inaccurate and only caused superficial damage to the Iranian Air Force. At the end of the day, no Iranian air base was put out of action and aircraft losses were negligible. To add insult to injury, the Iranians gained air superiority the next day. On the ground, Iraq deployed nine well-armed divisions against the three understrength Iranian divisions along the border (at the time, one quarter of the Iranian Army was fighting the Kurds and the Revolutionary Guards were mere rabble). In spite of Iraq's advantages in ground forces, the invasion moved at a snail's pace because the Iraqis preferred to halt and use massive amounts of firepower whenever any resistance was encountered. Iraqi mechanized forces never used their mobility to outflank or encircle the enemy. The only city the Iraqis captured in the invasion was Khorramshahr, but it did so over the course of four weeks and after suffering heavy losses. By October and November, the Iraqi invasion was its high point. They failed to secure nearly all of their major objectives with the exception of Khorramshahr; in response they announced a ceasefire on October 5 with the hopes of reorganizing its forces to resume the invasion. This allowed the Iranians to bring in reinforcements in December to launch a counteroffensive by 1981. Additionally, the start of the rainy season in Khuzestan hampered Iraqi forces as their vehicles could not operate effectively in the mud. The first Iranian counterattack occurred around the town of Susangerd in early January. The Iranian plan was to use two armored divisions to encircle the Iraqi brigades around the town, but Iraqi signals intelligence detected this plan and they moved two divisions and a brigade to bolster the defense. While the Iranian attack started off well, it ran into an Iraqi trap and lost 200 of their 300 tanks in the subsequent engagement. Despite the setback, the Susangerd tank battle and other battles that were fought during the summer were preparatory operations to refine Iranian skills for their main counteroffensive. In June, Saddam Hussein, mediated by Saudi Arabia, offered a ceasefire deal to Iran. Iran rejected it, declaring that they would "continue the war until Saddam Hussein is overthrown so that we can pray at Karbala and Jerusalem." This may seem ludicrous, but keep in mind that Iraq still occupied significant portions of Iranian land at the time. A ceasefire is not the same as a treaty, and no Iranian trusted Saddam to keep the peace. Iran launched its counteroffensive in September 1981. The Iranians first focused on defeating Iraqi forces in southern Khuzestan, and then switched their focus on northern Khuzestan in November. Near the town of Bostan the Iranians launched a fierce counterattack with two armored divisions reinforced by the Revolutionary Guards; the attack routed the two Iraqi divisions in the area and created a salient where an Iraqi grouping further north near Dezful—which was originally tasked with seizing the Zagros passes—was vulnerable to a flank attack. On 22 March 1982 the Iranians unleashed a double-envelopment attack against the Iraqi grouping with 60,000 regular troops and 80,000 Revolutionary Guards. Over the next eight days the Iranians routed the Iraqis who could escape and trapped several brigades in their encirclement. Iranian tactics in these battles generally consisted of a human-wave attack by the Revolutionary Guards against sectors held by the poorly-trained Iraqi Popular Army, which would be followed up by heavy forces exploiting the penetration and creating encirclements. Iraqi commanders were often too slow in responding to these penetrations, so they could not halt the Iranian attacks effectively. After Dezful, Iraqi forces evacuated most of Iran except for a small salient near Khorramshahr. This salient was eliminated after an Iranian counterattack launched at the end of April; Khorramshahr itself fell in late May, when Iranian forces recaptured the city in twenty four hours. The counteroffensive was over and Iran regained all the territory it lost since 1980.
1982-86: Iranian Invasion and StalemateIn July 1982 Iran invaded Iraq in Operation "Blessed Ramadan" with the goal of seizing the Iraqi city of al-Basrah. The Iranians knew that the Shia population in southern Iraq was unsympathetic to Saddam's regime, and believed that seizing al-Basrah would ignite a Shia revolt that could remove Saddam from power. Before "Blessed Ramadan" began Iraqi engineers built up considerable defenses around al-Basrah, including an artificial lake (Fish Lake) that could electrocute anyone who tried to jump in. The Iranians attacked on July 13-14, but most of their forces were halted by the fierce Iraqi defenses. One armored division with Revolutionary Guards support managed to penetrate through Iraqi defenses, but it was intercepted by three Iraqi armored divisions; 700 Iraqi tanks faced 100 Iranian tanks in a lopsided encounter and the penetrating force was routed. The Iranians tried again two more times, but again the Iraqi armored divisions drove them out. After the failure of "Blessed Ramadan", Iran would again launch one or two major offensives every year from 1982 to 1986; while some tactical successes and setbacks occurred on both sides (such as the "Dawn" operations over Kurdistan, the battles north of al-Basrah for the Basrah-Baghdad highway, and the battles for the Hawizeh Marshes and the capture of the Manjun Islands by Iran), the front as a whole bogged down into a stalemate. In 1984, Saddam initiated a large aerial offensive, strategically bombing a dozen Iranian cities, Iran responded with its own bombing and intercept campaign. This would become known as the first "War of the Cities". By 1985, Iraq enjoyed widespread military and financial support, not the least of which were from the West and the Warsaw Pact countries. Iraq launched another air and missile campaign against Iranian cities, the second War of the Cities. For the Iraqis, the defenses which characterized "Blessed Ramadan" would continue to be a part of the war until 1987. Engineers built defenses in depth so that any Iranian penetration would meet fresh defensive lines several kilometers back; strongpoint defenses optimized against mechanized forces were replaced with linear sand berms against infantry-heavy Iranian attacks. These defenses included pits for tanks and artillery, and platforms for antiaircraft guns to "hose down" massed infantry attacks. In addition, the Iraqi leadership expanded the army and redirected the ineffective Popular Army units to passive sectors of the front. An American effort was launched to resupply and revitalize the Iraqi Army after its defeat in Iran. Large loans were given to help Saddam; foreign countries like the Soviet Union and France sold weapons to Iraq. Saddam started to use chemical weapons and mustard gas at this point, which caused further losses among the Iranians. As the war went on for the Iranians, more problems appeared that lowered their military effectiveness. The international arms embargoes against Iran meant that it could not easily replace its stocks of American weapons, its computerized logistics system was sabotaged during the revolution, and the Revolutionary Guards' human-wave attacks—once successful during the Iranian counteroffensive—were ineffective against prepared Iraqi defenses. These Revolutionary Guards volunteers were inspired before battle by tales of Ashura, the Battle of Karbala, and the supreme glory of martyrdom, and sometimes by an actor (usually a more mature soldier), playing the part of Imam Hossein himself riding a white horse, galloping along the lines, providing the child soldiers a vision of "the hero who would lead them into their fateful battle before they met God." Furthermore, the poor coordination between the Revolutionary Guards and the Iranian Army crippled initial success, as the army was unable to follow up a successful human-wave attack with exploitation forces. To compensate for their lack of war materiel Iran bought weapons from North Korea, Libya, and China.
1986-87: Breaking the Stalemate in BasrahBy 1986 the war appeared to be at a deadlock. Iraq believed that a stalemate would force Iran to realize the extent of their meaningless offensives and come to a ceasefire. However, Iran struck where the Iraqis did not expect. On February 1986 Iranian forces commenced Operation "Dawn-8"; they crossed the Shatt al-Arab river and captured the al-Faw Peninsula—a tip of Iraqi land that jutted out into the Persian Gulf. The Iraqi leadership was now faced with a force that could bypass the considerable defenses of al-Basrah and take the city from an open flank. A counterattacking force was hastily assembled and sent towards al-Faw, but poor coordination (tanks were attacking with minimal infantry support) allowed Iranian AH-1 Cobra helicopters and forces that had crossed to repel the Iraqis with ease. Iraq desperately sent its Republican Guard divisions and launched an air offensive to stem the Iranian offensive, which were successful but they could not drive the Iranians from al-Faw. Iraq launched a third counterattack on February 22 with three divisions with considerable air support, but they too were unable to defeat the Iranians due to poor infantry-tank coordination. The failure of the al-Faw counterattacks convinced Saddam that his military commanders should be allowed to run operations as they saw fit. Because the regular Iraqi Army proved itself to be ineffective on the offense, the military leadership received approval to expand the Republican Guard into a specialized attack force. By early 1987, the original collection of brigades which made up the Republican Guard expanded into a corps command (Republican Guard Forces Command, RFGC) with eighteen brigades organized into three divisions. More importantly, the Republican Guard began to recruit people based on their military skills rather than political loyalty. The Iraqi General Staff decided to centralize control and write out the "script" for offensive operations, rather than the decentralized approach (let the field commanders do as they wish) which led to ineffectiveness in earlier operations of the war. Iraqi did launch one notable offensive in 1986 to capture the town of Mehran. Two divisions took the town on May 17 and held it until an Iranian counterattack drove the Iraqis out at the end of June. In the air, the mediocre performance of the Iraqi Air Force in strategic bombing forced the leadership to switch to SCUD missiles against Iranian cities. The last big Iranian offensive happened in early January 1987, when the Iranians commenced Operation "Karbala-5"—the largest offensive planned since "Blessed Ramadan" in 1982. Because the Iraqis were focused on a possible thrust from al-Faw, the Iranians played on this by launching a false attack from the peninsula. The real attack came from the north-east and south-east of al-Basrah. Iraqi forces there were initially surprised and the Iranians managed to penetrate two of the six defensive lines protecting the city; however, the attack ground to a halt due to a lack of tanks and a reliance on human-wave attacks. Both sides rushed in reinforcements to al-Basrah; Iraq unleashed a massive artillery bombardment mixed with chemical weapons against the attacking Iranians, as well as instructing the air force to deliver as many as 500 sorties a day to drive the Iranians out. Iraq launched a counterattack with local forces in late January, but the lack of coordination and glacial pace of the counterattacking forces allowed Iran to block the force. In February, the Iranians fed in more men to sustain the attack on the city. While Iranian forces managed to penetrate five of the six defensive lines around al-Basrah by the end of February, they had lost too much men (70,000-80,000) to continue attacking. Moreover, the arrival of Republican Guard reinforcements made the attacking task much more difficult. In March, the Iraqis attempted a second counterattack, which like the first broke down due to a lack of coordination. Ultimately, "Karbala-5" was the last large offensive operation Iran would undertake in the war. Other offensives like "Karbala-10" and "Nasr-4" were successfully carried out in Kurdistan, but they were strategically insignificant compared to the combat actions in the south. The UN Security Council passed Resolution 598, calling for a ceasefire; Saddam accepted but Iran—still believing that Iraqi forces were on the verge of collapse—refused, and so the fighting continued. The U.S. conducted four naval operations to protect oil tankers and to attack Iranian platforms that could be used for naval attacks on shipping in the Gulf.
1988: Final Iraqi OffensivesWith the failure of Iran's last offensive against al-Basrah, Iraq decided to launch five offensive operations starting in April 1988 to bring the war to a close. The first operation, Operation "Blessed Ramadan" (no relation to the Iranian operation) began on April 17 with the goal of recapturing the al-Faw Peninsula. The defending Iranian forces were surprised because of Iraqi's operational security and effective deception measures. The Republican Guard Corps and a regular army corps, plus a Republican Guard naval infantry brigade—100,000 men—were deployed against 15,000 Iranians defending the peninsula. The Iraqis were supported by heavy artillery and chemical bombardments and in thirty-five hours the peninsula was recaptured. The other four operations were part of a larger campaign called "Trust in God". The first of these operations commenced on May 25 when the Republican Guard Corps and a regular army corps were tasked with eliminating Iranian forces which established a salient to the south of Fish Lake after "Karbala-5". As in "Blessed Ramadan" Iraqi deception techniques caught the Iranians by surprise and the attacking Iraqi forces had considerable advantages in infantry and tank strength, as well as chemical weapons to reduce stubborn defenses. In twelve hours, Iraqi forces reduced the salient in a series of flanking maneuvers. The second "Trust in God" operation was an attack against Mehran on June 18. This time, the Iraqis launched their attack with the help of an anti-Khomeini dissident group. The attack started with a preparatory artillery barrage that included chemical weapons, followed up by a massed armored assault that swept away the Revolutionary Guard divisions that were defending the area. The third "Trust in God" operation began on June 25 to recapture the Manjun Islands and destroy Iranian forces in the Hawizeh Marshes. A Republican Guard naval infantry brigade seized the islands and tanks were moved to defend them against counterattacks. Then, a double envelopment maneuver was launched into the Hawizeh Marshes with Republican Guard divisions forming the north pincer and regular army divisions forming the south pincer. The Iraqis devastated six to eight Iranian divisions before withdrawing across the border. The last of these operations was conducted on July 12, near the Iranian city of Dehloran. The Iraqis again employed a double envelopment maneuver scheme with the Republican Guard Corps and a regular army corps; they drove 40 kilometers into Iran and routed a number of Iranian formations before withdrawing back into Iraq. During this year, a U.S. warship shot down Iran Air Flight 655, resulting in the death of 300 people, apparently during a botched covert operation. Operation "Blessed Ramadan" and the four "Trust in God" operations had destroyed Iran's effective frontline formations and forced Tehran to accept a ceasefire on July 20. Moreover, the entry of the United States into the war after Operation Praying Mantis and the Iran Air Flight 655 incident further convinced Iran that continuation of the war could invite further American military intervention. After the ceasefire, an anti-government group inside Iran began an armed uprising against the government, supported by Iraqi fighter bombers. Iraq also launched a surprise offensive into Iran. However, widespread censure and the threat of foreign intervention forced Saddam to relent and the uprising was crushed. The war was over.
AftermathThe war was very costly in terms of people dead, infrastructure destroyed and debts incurred, for both countries. Iran's casualties numbered at over 1 million and Iraqi casualties numbered 400,000-500,000, and this is excluding an unknown number of civilian deaths. Iran and Iraq both incurred debts of over 600 billion U.S. dollars, and much of Iraq's oil production infrastructure was in ruins. And all of this was for zero territorial gain for either country. Politically, it was inconclusive. Both sides claimed victory; Saddam had successfully held on Basra throughout the war and Iran had defeated the initial Iraqi invasion and if they had won the Battle for Basra, would have reached Baghdad. Both sides failed to achieve their stated goals, however. In Iran, the Islamic revolution had grown ever more radicalized over the course of the war. Their leaders never forgot U.S. support of Saddam, blaming it for cheating them of victory. With its oil production crippled, Iraq found itself unable to pay off any of its debts, the largest amount being owed to Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. This eventually drove Saddam to order an invasion of Kuwait, which resulted in the First Gulf War, wherein the Iraqi army was all but destroyed by an international coalition. Over the next decade, Saddam would slowly lose his grip on power and his own country.
Tropes associated with this war:
- Arms Dealer: Iran and Iraq received aid, as well as bought vehicles and materiel, from many different countries. For Iraq, this included chemical and biological weapons.
- Most of the West, chief among them France, aided Iraq, along with Egypt, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, Yugoslavia, and the USSR.
- Iran received military aid from Israel, North Korea, Libya, and China. There is also the unusual instance of the Iran-Contra affair where weapons were sold to Iran by US Government officials!!!
- Spain supplied arms to both Iran and Iraq. The U.S. and USSR also sold arms to Iran through other sources.
- Iraq received Weapons Of Mass Destruction or ingredients and equipment related to them from multiple sources◊: Brazil, China, Egypt, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Niger, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States.
- Child Soldiers: One of the war's most infamous things was the Iranian recruitment of young children, who were given plastic "keys to Heaven" and then ordered to run straight out on Iraqi minefields in order to clear the ground for the main army. Some were also given infantry weapons and told to attack Iraqi positions. It's said that plenty of Iraqi troops cracked by the sheer guilt they felt after they had killed countless young children who tried to storm them by sheer numbers.
- Deadly Gas: There was considerable use of chemical weapons in an attempt to break the stalemate in the later years of the war, yet another parallel with World War One, as evidenced by the picture above.
- Enemy Mine: Iran received arms, training and spare parts from... Israel, of all countries, who regarded Saddam Hussein as the greater threat. It's also been claimed that the Israeli bombing of the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq was partially aided by Iranian intelligence (after the Iranians had attempted to bomb the same facility in 1980). Iran completely denies all of this.
- The United States really didn't like Saddam's Iraq, yet they still provided it with support because they hated Iran more. They had actually helped Iran and even warned them of Saddam's plans, but cut off all support after the incident with the American embassy. In an even straighter example, the U.S. was only a minor supporter of Iraq, and the largest was... the Soviet Union.
- Evil Versus Evil: Oh yes. Between the brutal dictatorship of Iraq, which took time during the war to attempt genocide against the Kurdish population, and the fanatical Iranian regime with its heartbreaking use of child soldiers... Henry Kissinger may have been onto something when he wondered why both sides couldn't lose.
- General Failure: Saddam Hussein, seriously. Underestimated the Iranians, check. Attacked Iran without any actual major preparations, check. Didn't build any defenses for the resources industry and the supply lines, check. Didn't arm the Iraqi Air Force with proper weapons before attacking, check. Executed generals who retreated from unwinnable battles, check. It's a wonder how he survived eight years of war without being overthrown and/or killed by the Iranians, no less managed to last 24 years in power and two other wars. However, it was subverted by the mid '80s when he allowed his generals more leeway in the management of the armed forces and the military operations themselves.
- Good Guns, Bad Guns: The Iraqis mostly used Soviet weapons, but used French aircraft and missile systems. The Iranians used mostly American and German weaponry for their actual military, but Soviet gear for the Basij. Zig-zagged in that neither side was good.
- Hollywood Tactics: The Iraqis took this Up to Eleven. Despite possessing an enormous equipment advantage right at the beginning of the war, kicking up production even further in the later stages, and using weapons of mass destruction to take out single militia squads, they were still just barely able to draw in the war with Iran. Kenneth Pollack's "Arabs at War: Military Effectiveness, 1948-1991" goes into detail about this.
- None of the low level Iraqi officers or non-commissioned officers had any initiative whatsoever. Tank platoons would dig in to static positions and absolutely refuse to maneuver unless specifically ordered to. This resulted in many, many cases of Iranian infantry flanking and destroying Iraqi tanks by shooting them in the side, while the Iraqis just sit on their asses, not even trying to move or defend themselves. Entire Iraqi battalions would fail to respond to Iranian infiltration of their lines, as well.
- The Iraqi infantry were barely trained, and armed with little more than rifles. For context, the average US Army fireteam consists of four men: two with rifles, one with a rifle + grenade launcher, and one with a light machine gun. The UK Army has a similar set-up. This gives the team the firepower needed to actually produce casualties (less than 10% of modern combat casualties come from rifle fire). The Iraqis decided "screw it" and skipped giving their men grenade launchers and machine guns, leaving them at a severe firepower disadvantage against the Iranians, who would spam machine gun fire wherever they could, and use RPG rounds to kill single soldiers. The Iraqis actually DID use light machine guns, occasionally... but only in static, WW1-style trench nests. These static formations ran into the same problem as the dug-in tanks.
- This reached truly baffling levels with their artillery and fighter-bomber units. Men would shell/bomb pre-chosen locations and do absolutely nothing else. This resulted in some hilarious displays of "marksmanship". Like an artillery company wasting hundreds of shells pounding empty desert, because they were not explicitly ordered to adjust their aim when the enemy moved one kilometer to the right.
- As a result of the above lack of initiative, Iraqi assaults would break down the minute any detail of the plan changed. The Iraqi generals eventually got sick of their troops running around like lemmings with their heads chopped off at the slightest setback, and so resorted to micromanaging every movement down to the company level. They also refused to make plans that required their troops to fight or move longer than 48 hours, knowing that their men just couldn't manage it.
- The levels of Iraqi fail in this war can barely be adequately described in text. To give an idea of just how badly the deck was stacked in their favor, and how they managed to squander it anyway, here's a direct quote from Kenneth Pollack's book:
Kenneth Pollack: In every battle the Iraqis were able to bring enormous firepower to bear against the outgunned Iranians. Despite this advantage, Iraq's invasion of southwestern Iran did little damage to the disorganized and demoralized Iranian military, nor did Baghdad conquer anything of military or economic value in 3 months of unimpeded defenses. By the end of the war, Iraqi forces not only enjoyed a very sizable advantage in numbers of equipment but also possessed an equivalent edge in the sophistication of their weaponry. For instance, Iraqi forces deployed nearly 5,000 tanks compared to the less than 1,000 tanks Iran could muster- and most of the Iraqi tanks that saw the brunt of the fighting were advanced T-72s and T-62s, while the Iranians were mostly equipped with miserable Chinese Type-59s. Whereas the Iraqi Air Force had nearly 700 combat aircraft, including new French Mirages and Soviet MiG-29s, the Iranians had less than 100 flyable U.S. F-14s, F-4s, and F-5s, few of which were fully functional as a result of the US arms embargo. Still, Iraq was able to eke out a stalemate in 1988 only by resorting to liberal doses of chemical warfare and creating local force ratios of 20- or even 30-to-1 in tanks, troops, and guns.
- La Résistance: The Kurdish Peshmerga, who fought the Iraqis in the northern mountains of Iraq with the military support of the Iranians.
- Laser-Guided Karma: Saddam Hussein's use of chemical weapons would later become one of the United States' stated reasons for the 2003 invasion and subsequent toppling of his regime. Despite using the Chemical WMDs as a proof that Saddam is dangerous, no UN Security Council Resolution mentioned the thousands of Iranian civilians that were killed by those weapons, focusing on the Kurds and other minorities instead. Unfortunate Implications aside, Iran called them on the hypocrisy of that.
- Not to mention that many countries (the U.S. included) condemning Iraq for use of such weapons had sold them those before, or parts thereof (as well as passing on satellite data on the most effective places to use the poison gas, both in terms of Iranian troop positions and weather patterns), as stated above.
- The cost of the war also led to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait and subsequent humiliating defeat.
- Kick Them While They Are Down: Iran was still reeling from the revolution, and the Shah had taken a lot of the military commanders with him when he fled the country, when Saddam decided to invade.
- Shaggy Dog Story: The war ended in a stalemate with no changes. Except the loss of a million lives, of course.
- On the other hand, it did result in Iraq eventually turning against Arab and Western countries, so Iran was able to have more than a decade of relative peace. Earn Your Happy Ending, to a point.
- There Is No Kill Like Overkill: The Iraqi defenses around al-Basrah included antiaicraft guns that were used against the Iranians' massed infantry attacks.
- Underestimating Badassery: The Iraqis underestimated the Iranians with catastrophic results. They went in and expected to win a quick victory but as soon as the moment of surprise was gone and the Iranians started to counterattack, the Iraqis realized that they had underestimated the Iranians' zeal and military strength, and with it they could kiss the quick victory goodbye.
- More like "Overestimating Badassery". The Iranians genuinely were as poor as the Iraqis thought they were. Their actual military was outnumbered two to one by the Iraqis for most of the war in men, and anywhere from two to one/ten to one in tanks, artillery, aircraft, armored personnel carriers, and trucks. The Iraqis had a technological advantage too, with the majority of their equipment being '70s vintage, as opposed to the Iranian equipment, which with the exception of their air forces came straight out of the late 40s/early 50s. Their army's command and logistic structure had been gutted by the revolution too, so a lot of the Iranian resistance the Iraqis encountered consisted solely of local light infantry without any central direction. It just so happens that the Iraqis themselves were really, really, really bad (see above).
- We Have Reserves / Hopeless War: When you make World War One look very good by comparison, you KNOW you have issues.
- What the Hell, Hero?: The U.S. Navy shooting down an Iranian passenger jet, due to a misinterpreted radar image identifying it as a military craft.
- Zerg Rush: While the Iranians had a pretty good fleet, air force and amphibious troops, this was their main strategy during traditional land battles, using the Basij. Pretty viable strategy when Iran had almost three times as many people as Iraq.
- It was a lot more complicated than that. The Iranians would use (extremely) expendable militia (e.g. Revolutionary Guards) to punch a hole in Iraqi lines. They would then follow that by creating a concentration of tanks, artillery, and professional troops, and using it to exploit the gap and flank entire Iraqi units. They didn't Zerg Rush with their actual army, as the Iraqis did, because they were very much outnumbered.
Examples in works
- Referenced in Yes, Prime Minister (which was set in The '80s) in the episode "A Diplomatic Incident":
Bernard: "No, we cannot have alphabetical seating at the abbey. That would mean Iraq and Iran would be sitting next to each other..."
- Covered in brief in a 1980s Spitting Image episode in the form of a newsreel, poking fun at the conflict from the vantage points of both the warring nations and the (slumbering) international community.
- Persepolis: Part of the film (and the original graphic novel) is set during the period, as we get to see stylized battle scenes and Tehran attacked by bombers and SCUDs.
- The war plays a big role in House of Saddam, a historical drama chronicling the rise and fall of Iraq's former dictator Saddam Hussein.
- One of the Steel Panthers games includes a scenario from the war that can be played by either side.
- Two campaigns from Steel Armor: Blaze of War cover a the Susangerd tank battle from both Iraqi and Iranian sides.
- The war is a late-war event in Twilight Struggle.