Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8,9 (click to see context) from:
* CultClassic: Though the film is quite controversial for its subject matter among many critics and audiences alike, it has attributed a sizable fanbase by those who enjoy its no-holds-barred take on SurrealHorror.
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: A common criticism -- critical reviews noted that eventually the barrage of horror takes the edge off itself. [[CausticCritic Critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes.
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: A common criticism -- critical reviews noted that eventually the barrage of horror takes the edge off itself. [[CausticCritic Critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes.
to:
* CultClassic: Though the film is quite controversial for its subject matter among many critics and audiences alike, it has attributed a sizable decent fanbase by those who enjoy its no-holds-barred take on SurrealHorror.
*DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: ''' DarknessInducedAudienceApathy''': A very common criticism -- criticism, critical reviews noted that eventually the barrage of horror takes the edge off itself. [[CausticCritic Critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes. Even fans of SurrealHorror find the tone of the movie to be far too bleak, though whether they see it as being legitimately too twisted or [[{{Narm}} so unabashedly dark It becomes goofy]] tends to vary.
*
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
ZCE and self-contradiction.
Deleted line(s) 15,16 (click to see context) :
* NightmareFuel: Of the highest caliber.
** However, the poor animation and bad voice acting made this NightmareRetardant for some people.
** However, the poor animation and bad voice acting made this NightmareRetardant for some people.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
And the opinion of a disgraced negligent asshole matters because?
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: A common criticism -- critical reviews noted that eventually the barrage of horror takes the edge off itself. [[CausticCritic Critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes. Reportedly, even Creator/DougWalker refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
to:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: A common criticism -- critical reviews noted that eventually the barrage of horror takes the edge off itself. [[CausticCritic Critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes. Reportedly, even Creator/DougWalker refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: A common criticism -- critical reviews noted that eventually the barrage of horror takes the edge off itself. [CausticCritic Critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes. Reportedly, even Creator/DougWalker refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
to:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: A common criticism -- critical reviews noted that eventually the barrage of horror takes the edge off itself. [CausticCritic [[CausticCritic Critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes. Reportedly, even Creator/DougWalker refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: A common criticism -- critical reviews noted that eventually the barrage of horror takes the edge off itself.
to:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: A common criticism -- critical reviews noted that eventually the barrage of horror takes the edge off itself. [CausticCritic Critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes. Reportedly, even Creator/DougWalker refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
Deleted line(s) 23,24 (click to see context) :
* TooSpicyForYogSothoth: Why [[CausticCritic critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes.
** Reportedly, even Creator/{{Doug Walker}} refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
** Reportedly, even Creator/{{Doug Walker}} refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 10 (click to see context) :
* EsotericHappyEnding: ''The Mask That The Monsters Wear.'' [[spoiler: Ralph brutally murders all the short's human antagonists in a mad killing spree, mutilates his conjoined twin, then hears Sophie's voice proclaim he's saved her. Shortly after, he returns to the well and breaks down in front of the Smiling Man, who comforts him.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EsotericHappyEnding: ''The Mask That The Monsters Wear.'' [[spoiler: Ralph brutally murders all the short's human antagonists in a mad killing spree, mutilates his conjoined twin, then hears Sophie's voice proclaim he's saved her. Shortly after, he returns to the well and breaks down in front of the Smiling Man, who comforts him.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
not sure what this has to do with the premise.
Deleted line(s) 7 (click to see context) :
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: Considering the horrific imagery that populated the entirety of the film, its not hard to see why this film's so divisive. To make matters worse, a major criticism is that it relies far too heavily on cheap shock value rather than clever scares.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 24 (click to see context) from:
* TooSpicyForYogSogoth: Why [[CausticCritic critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes.
to:
* TooSpicyForYogSogoth: TooSpicyForYogSothoth: Why [[CausticCritic critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing arguable and played with examples. The former is not allowed anywhere and the latter is not allowed on YMMV pages.
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* CrossesTheLineTwice: According to the creator, the first short was partly an attempt at this, but production focused more on the horror aspect afterwards. He mostly averted this in the later two shorts. Arguably the film as a whole crosses the line '''[[UpToEleven three]]''' times back into material that's too disturbing for [[BrainBleach anyone to ever want to remember.]]
to:
* CrossesTheLineTwice: According to the creator, the first short was partly an attempt at this, but production focused more on the horror aspect afterwards. He mostly averted this in the later two shorts. Arguably the film as a whole crosses the line '''[[UpToEleven three]]''' times back into material that's too disturbing for [[BrainBleach anyone to ever want to remember.]]
Deleted line(s) 15 (click to see context) :
** Also inverted: Some of the more disturbing moments in the rest of anthology were intended as jokes.
Changed line(s) 28,31 (click to see context) from:
* WhatDoYouMeanItWasntMadeOnDrugs: Or, at least, really hard drugs, rather than cannabis [[WordofGod (as he admits)]]?
* TheWoobie:
** Sophia and the hooker definitely, with Ralph and Tommy as maybes.
** The main protagonist in the second short. He may be a crazy SerialKiller with confusing intentions, but he is easily one of the more sympathetic characters in the entire film, if but for his inner suffering and the torment those strange creatures seem to be putting him through.
* TheWoobie:
** Sophia and the hooker definitely, with Ralph and Tommy as maybes.
** The main protagonist in the second short. He may be a crazy SerialKiller with confusing intentions, but he is easily one of the more sympathetic characters in the entire film, if but for his inner suffering and the torment those strange creatures seem to be putting him through.
to:
* WhatDoYouMeanItWasntMadeOnDrugs: Or, at least, really hard drugs, rather than cannabis [[WordofGod [[WordOfGod (as he admits)]]?
*TheWoobie:
** Sophia and the hooker definitely, with Ralph and Tommy as maybes.
**TheWoobie: The main protagonist in the second short. He may be a crazy SerialKiller with confusing intentions, but he is easily one of the more sympathetic characters in the entire film, if but for his inner suffering and the torment those strange creatures seem to be putting him through.
*
** Sophia and the hooker definitely, with Ralph and Tommy as maybes.
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 30 (click to see context) from:
** Sophia and the hooker, definitely, with Ralph and Tommy as maybes.
to:
** Sophia and the hooker, hooker definitely, with Ralph and Tommy as maybes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
** Reportedly, even Creator/Doug Walker refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
to:
** Reportedly, even Creator/Doug Walker Creator/{{Doug Walker}} refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
** Reportedly, even [[Creator/Doug Walker Doug Walker]] refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
to:
** Reportedly, even [[Creator/Doug Creator/Doug Walker Doug Walker]] refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
** Reportedly, even [[Creator?Doug Walker Doug Walker]] refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
to:
** Reportedly, even [[Creator?Doug [[Creator/Doug Walker Doug Walker]] refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Reportedly, even [[Creator?Doug Walker Doug Walker]] refuses to acknowledge this movie exists.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* CrossesTheLineTwice: According to the creator, the first short was partly an attempt at this, but production focused more on the horror aspect afterwards. He mostly averted this in the later two shorts.
to:
* CrossesTheLineTwice: According to the creator, the first short was partly an attempt at this, but production focused more on the horror aspect afterwards. He mostly averted this in the later two shorts. Arguably the film as a whole crosses the line '''[[UpToEleven three]]''' times back into material that's too disturbing for [[BrainBleach anyone to ever want to remember.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* {{Narm}}: ''Tainted Milk'' has a few moments of this, given that the film was originally intended to be a ''Series/{{Lassie}}'' parody.
to:
* {{Narm}}: {{Narm}}:
** ''Tainted Milk'' has a few moments of this, given that the film was originally intended to be a ''Series/{{Lassie}}'' parody.
** ''Tainted Milk'' has a few moments of this, given that the film was originally intended to be a ''Series/{{Lassie}}'' parody.
Changed line(s) 28 (click to see context) from:
* TheWoobie: Sophia and the hooker, definitely, with Ralph and Tommy as maybes.
to:
* TheWoobie: TheWoobie:
** Sophia and the hooker, definitely, with Ralph and Tommy as maybes.
** Sophia and the hooker, definitely, with Ralph and Tommy as maybes.
Deleted line(s) 30 (click to see context) :
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: Considering the horrific imagery that populated the entirety of the film, its not hard to see why this film's so divisive.
to:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: Considering the horrific imagery that populated the entirety of the film, its not hard to see why this film's so divisive. To make matters worse, a major criticism is that it relies far too heavily on cheap shock value rather than clever scares.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I don't think he was striking out against that trope, and to call him an incompetent is at best uncalled for.
Deleted line(s) 28 (click to see context) :
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: In theory, an animated horror movie was an interesting idea, and could have been a major statement against the AnimationAgeGhetto if it had been done competently.
Changed line(s) 30,31 (click to see context) from:
** The main protagonist in the second short. He may be a crazy SerialKiller with confusing intentions, but he is easily one of the more sympathetic characters in the entire film, if not for his inner suffering and the torment those strange creatures seem to be putting him through.
to:
** The main protagonist in the second short. He may be a crazy SerialKiller with confusing intentions, but he is easily one of the more sympathetic characters in the entire film, if not but for his inner suffering and the torment those strange creatures seem to be putting him through.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 12 (click to see context) :
* LoveItOrHateIt: Film critics seem to be either for or against it very strongly, with little middle ground.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: In theory, an animated horror movie was an interesting idea, and could have been a major statement against the AnimationAgeGhetto if it had been done competently.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
* TooSpicyForYoggSogoth: Why [[CausticCritic critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes.
to:
* TooSpicyForYoggSogoth: TooSpicyForYogSogoth: Why [[CausticCritic critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 25 (click to see context) :
* TooSpicyForYoggSoggoth: Why [[CausticCritic critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes.
Added DiffLines:
* TooSpicyForYoggSogoth: Why [[CausticCritic critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
* TooSpicyForYogSoggoth: Why CausticCritics like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes.
to:
* TooSpicyForYogSoggoth: TooSpicyForYoggSoggoth: Why CausticCritics [[CausticCritic critics]] like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TooSpicyForYogSoggoth: Why CausticCritics like WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter and WebVideo/{{PhantomStrider}} refuse to review the movie, with the former saying that making it an Animated Atrocity [[InsultToRocks is too good of an honor for it]], and the latter turning it off after the first ten minutes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* WhatDoYouMeanItWasntMadeOnDrugs: Inverted. Does this look like the director was stoned when he made it? That's because he was stoned, and interestingly enough, [[WordofGod he said it himself]].
to:
* WhatDoYouMeanItWasntMadeOnDrugs: Inverted. Does this look like the director was stoned when he made it? That's because he was stoned, and interestingly enough, Or, at least, really hard drugs, rather than cannabis [[WordofGod (as he said it himself]].admits)]]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: A common criticism from critics and audiences of the film.
to:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: A common criticism from critics and audiences of -- critical reviews noted that eventually the film.barrage of horror takes the edge off itself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* CrossesTheLineTwice: According to the creator, the first short was partly an attempt at this, but production focused more on the horror aspect afterwards. he mostly averted this in the later two shorts.
to:
* CrossesTheLineTwice: According to the creator, the first short was partly an attempt at this, but production focused more on the horror aspect afterwards. he He mostly averted this in the later two shorts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* CultClassic: Though the film is quite controversial for it's subject matter among many critics and audiences alike, it has attributed a sizable fanbase by those who enjoy it's no-holds-barred take on SurrealHorror.
to:
* CultClassic: Though the film is quite controversial for it's its subject matter among many critics and audiences alike, it has attributed a sizable fanbase by those who enjoy it's its no-holds-barred take on SurrealHorror.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
** However, the poor animation and bad voice acting made this NightmareFuelRetardent for some people.
to:
** However, the poor animation and bad voice acting made this NightmareFuelRetardent NightmareRetardant for some people.