Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* CrossTheLineTwice: The mere premise of the film already does that.
to:
* CrossTheLineTwice: CrossesTheLineTwice: The mere premise of the film already does that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 7 (click to see context) :
* HoYay: Despite Larry and Richard having blatant interest in women (The biggest example would be Richard's crush on Gwen), the two have a lot more chemistry than anyone else with their arguments being akin to a [[LikeAnOldMarriedCouple bickering couple]] and Bernie writing his fake suicide note around their dynamic, portraying them as lovers who stole the two million for Larry's sex-change operation.
** It gets stronger in the sequel once [[SequelNonEntity Gwen is out of the picture]]. Notable moments include a drunken Larry accidentally cuddling Richard in bed and the former being extremely worried and clingy once the latter is on the verge of death.
** It gets stronger in the sequel once [[SequelNonEntity Gwen is out of the picture]]. Notable moments include a drunken Larry accidentally cuddling Richard in bed and the former being extremely worried and clingy once the latter is on the verge of death.
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
** "That's illegal! What you're doing is illegal!"
to:
** "That's "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rs1b0lr3ptg That's illegal! What you're doing is illegal!"illegal!]]"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* NarmCharm: Both movies have a fanbase simply because they're so ridiculous. Turned up to eleven in the sequel. Perhaps surprised that a sequel ''had even been commissioned'', the director made sure it was a [[RefugeInAudacity Vacation In Audacity]], going to the Caribbean and adding a treasure hunt with a liberal helping of HollywoodVoodoo, in addition to using the tagline: "He's still dead!" on the posters. Get the popcorn and enjoy.
to:
* NarmCharm: Both movies have a fanbase simply because they're so ridiculous. Turned Naturally, this is turned up to ''beyond'' eleven in the sequel. Perhaps surprised that a sequel ''had even been commissioned'', the director made sure it was a [[RefugeInAudacity Vacation In Audacity]], going to the Caribbean and adding a treasure hunt with a liberal helping of HollywoodVoodoo, in addition to using the tagline: "He's still dead!" on the posters. Get the popcorn and enjoy.
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
** Gwen makes no appearances in the sequel. Not even the decency of being mentioned in dialogue. The sequel just acts like Gwen never even existed. Even in the original film, Gwen is somewhat of a wasted character as she's never involved in the main plot. Not once does she ever get involved with the guys' OfCorpseHesAlive antics with Bernie. Her part as the TokenRomance for Richard could easily be cut from the film, and nothing would feel out of place.
to:
** Gwen makes no appearances in the sequel. Not even the decency of being mentioned in dialogue. The sequel just acts like Gwen she never even existed. Even in the original film, Gwen is somewhat of a wasted character as she's never involved in the main plot. Not once does she ever get involved with the guys' OfCorpseHesAlive antics with Bernie.Bernie, even though there is ample opportunity for them to let her into the secret. Her part as the TokenRomance for Richard could easily be cut from the film, and nothing would feel out of place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* CommonKnowledge: It's pretty much a universal belief that the original movie as a whole is about two guys getting into crazy hijinks while dragging around the corpse of their dead boss and pretending that he's still alive. In actuality, Bernie doesn't die until about a third of the way through the film.
to:
* CommonKnowledge: It's pretty much a universal belief that the original movie as a whole is about two guys getting into crazy hijinks while dragging around the corpse of their dead boss and pretending that he's still alive. In actuality, Bernie doesn't die until about a third of the way through the film.film, and the guys spend most of the rest of the movie arguing about whether they should call the police and report Bernie's death.
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* NarmCharm: Both movies have a fanbase simply because they're so ridiculous. Turned up to eleven in the sequel. Perhaps surprised that a sequel had even been commissioned, the director made sure it was a [[RefugeInAudacity Vacation In Audacity]], going to the Caribbean and adding a treasure hunt with a liberal helping of HollywoodVoodoo. Get the popcorn and enjoy.
to:
* NarmCharm: Both movies have a fanbase simply because they're so ridiculous. Turned up to eleven in the sequel. Perhaps surprised that a sequel had ''had even been commissioned, commissioned'', the director made sure it was a [[RefugeInAudacity Vacation In Audacity]], going to the Caribbean and adding a treasure hunt with a liberal helping of HollywoodVoodoo.HollywoodVoodoo, in addition to using the tagline: "He's still dead!" on the posters. Get the popcorn and enjoy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The name of the film proper has become a term for [[OfCorpseHesAlive puppeteering a corpse]]. "Weekend at Bernie's-ing" in particular sometimes pops up as an improvised verb.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: Moments before his death, it takes a bit for Bernie to react to Paulie asking him for a cigarette. Some have taken this as a sign that Bernie knew that something was up, but was killed before he could fully understand what was about to happen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* {{Sequelitis}}: As mentioned above, one can like the sequel for doubling down on the ridiculousness. But the consensus is that it is a forced attempt at getting more from a joke that was alredy stretched for a whole movie.
to:
* {{Sequelitis}}: As mentioned above, one can like the sequel for doubling down on the ridiculousness. But the consensus is that it is a forced attempt at getting more from a joke that was alredy already stretched for a whole movie.
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
** Gwen makes no appearances in the sequel. Not even the decency of being mentioned in dialogue. The sequel just acts like Gwen never even existed. Even in the original film, Gwen is somewhat of a wasted character as shes never involved in the main plot. Not once does she ever get involved with the guys' OfCorpseHesAlive antics with Bernie. Her part as the TokenRomance for Richard could easily be cut from the film, and nothing would feel out of place.
to:
** Gwen makes no appearances in the sequel. Not even the decency of being mentioned in dialogue. The sequel just acts like Gwen never even existed. Even in the original film, Gwen is somewhat of a wasted character as shes she's never involved in the main plot. Not once does she ever get involved with the guys' OfCorpseHesAlive antics with Bernie. Her part as the TokenRomance for Richard could easily be cut from the film, and nothing would feel out of place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* CommonKnowledge: It's pretty much a universal belief that the original movie as a whole is about two guys getting into crazy hijinks while dragging around the corpse of their dead boss and pretending that he's still alive. In actuality, Bernie doesn't die until about a 3rd of the way through the film.
to:
* CommonKnowledge: It's pretty much a universal belief that the original movie as a whole is about two guys getting into crazy hijinks while dragging around the corpse of their dead boss and pretending that he's still alive. In actuality, Bernie doesn't die until about a 3rd third of the way through the film.
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** From the first film; even if it's PlayedForLaughs, the fact remains that Vito's girlfriend -- who was canoodling with Bernie while he was alive -- ''has sex with a corpse''.
to:
** From the first film; even if it's PlayedForLaughs, the fact remains that Vito's girlfriend -- who was canoodling with Bernie while he was alive -- ''has ''[[ILoveTheDead has sex with a corpse''.corpse]]''. Granted, she didn't know he was dead, but it's still pretty disgusting.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
** Gwen makes no appearances in the sequel. Not even the decency of being mentioned in dialogue. The sequel just acts like Gwen never even existed.
to:
** Gwen makes no appearances in the sequel. Not even the decency of being mentioned in dialogue. The sequel just acts like Gwen never even existed. Even in the original film, Gwen is somewhat of a wasted character as shes never involved in the main plot. Not once does she ever get involved with the guys' OfCorpseHesAlive antics with Bernie. Her part as the TokenRomance for Richard could easily be cut from the film, and nothing would feel out of place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 3,5 (click to see context) :
* IdiotPlot:
** The story would have been a whole lot shorter if someone besides the main characters had actually taken a closer look at the oddly limp, quiet, and unresponsive person and realized he was that way because he was dead. Lampshaded a bit by the protagonists, along with some justification; everyone except for them is so incredibly self-centered that they ''can't'' notice.
** In the sequel. The company blaming Larry and Richard for the embezzlement and firing them is understandable. Except Lomax left behind an audio recording of him wanting the two dead, a briefcase full of cash and a rather silly unsigned suicide/confession note with ''his fingerprints on it that he typed on his own typewriter''. Not to mention the police had arrested the hitman that Vito sent to kill him. It's ridiculous that they'd ignore all that evidence which corroborates their story. On the other hand, the embezzlement was such a mess and had already brought a lot of unwanted publicity so they'd probably want the whole thing swept under the rug as quickly as possible.
** The story would have been a whole lot shorter if someone besides the main characters had actually taken a closer look at the oddly limp, quiet, and unresponsive person and realized he was that way because he was dead. Lampshaded a bit by the protagonists, along with some justification; everyone except for them is so incredibly self-centered that they ''can't'' notice.
** In the sequel. The company blaming Larry and Richard for the embezzlement and firing them is understandable. Except Lomax left behind an audio recording of him wanting the two dead, a briefcase full of cash and a rather silly unsigned suicide/confession note with ''his fingerprints on it that he typed on his own typewriter''. Not to mention the police had arrested the hitman that Vito sent to kill him. It's ridiculous that they'd ignore all that evidence which corroborates their story. On the other hand, the embezzlement was such a mess and had already brought a lot of unwanted publicity so they'd probably want the whole thing swept under the rug as quickly as possible.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Up To Eleven is being dewicked.
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* NarmCharm: Both movies have a fanbase simply because they're so ridiculous. Turned UpToEleven in the sequel. Perhaps surprised that a sequel had even been commissioned, the director made sure it was a [[RefugeInAudacity Vacation In Audacity]], going to the Caribbean and adding a treasure hunt with a liberal helping of HollywoodVoodoo. Get the popcorn and enjoy.
to:
* NarmCharm: Both movies have a fanbase simply because they're so ridiculous. Turned UpToEleven up to eleven in the sequel. Perhaps surprised that a sequel had even been commissioned, the director made sure it was a [[RefugeInAudacity Vacation In Audacity]], going to the Caribbean and adding a treasure hunt with a liberal helping of HollywoodVoodoo. Get the popcorn and enjoy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** In the sequel. The company blaming Larry and Richard for the embezzlement and firing them is understandable. Except Lomax left behind an audio recording of him wanting the two dead, a briefcase full of cash and a rather silly unsigned suicide/confession note with ''his fingerprints on it that he typed on his own typewriter''. Not to mention the police had arrested the hitman that Vito sent to kill him. It's ridiculous that they'd ignore all that evidence which corroborates their story. On the other hand, the embezzlement was such a mess and had already brought a lot of unwanted publicity, they'd probably want the whole thing swept under the rug as quickly as possible.
to:
** In the sequel. The company blaming Larry and Richard for the embezzlement and firing them is understandable. Except Lomax left behind an audio recording of him wanting the two dead, a briefcase full of cash and a rather silly unsigned suicide/confession note with ''his fingerprints on it that he typed on his own typewriter''. Not to mention the police had arrested the hitman that Vito sent to kill him. It's ridiculous that they'd ignore all that evidence which corroborates their story. On the other hand, the embezzlement was such a mess and had already brought a lot of unwanted publicity, publicity so they'd probably want the whole thing swept under the rug as quickly as possible.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** In the sequel. The company blaming Larry and Richard for the embezzlement and firing them is understandable. Except Lomax left behind an audio recording of him wanting the two dead, a briefcase full of cash and a rather silly unsigned suicide/confession note with ''his fingerprints on it that he typed on his own typewriter''. Not to mention the police had arrested the hitman that Vito sent to kill him. It's ridiculous that they'd ignore all that evidence which corroborates their story that Lomax was the culprit and wanted them dead.
to:
** In the sequel. The company blaming Larry and Richard for the embezzlement and firing them is understandable. Except Lomax left behind an audio recording of him wanting the two dead, a briefcase full of cash and a rather silly unsigned suicide/confession note with ''his fingerprints on it that he typed on his own typewriter''. Not to mention the police had arrested the hitman that Vito sent to kill him. It's ridiculous that they'd ignore all that evidence which corroborates their story that Lomax story. On the other hand, the embezzlement was such a mess and had already brought a lot of unwanted publicity, they'd probably want the culprit and wanted them dead.whole thing swept under the rug as quickly as possible.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** In the sequel. The company blaming Larry and Richard for the embezzlement and firing them is understandable. Except Lomax left behind an audio recording of him wanting the two dead, a briefcase full of cash and a rather silly unsigned suicide/confession note with ''his fingerprints on it that he typed on his own typewriter''. It's ridiculous that they'd ignore all that evidence which corroborates their story that Lomax was the culprit and wanted them dead.
to:
** In the sequel. The company blaming Larry and Richard for the embezzlement and firing them is understandable. Except Lomax left behind an audio recording of him wanting the two dead, a briefcase full of cash and a rather silly unsigned suicide/confession note with ''his fingerprints on it that he typed on his own typewriter''. Not to mention the police had arrested the hitman that Vito sent to kill him. It's ridiculous that they'd ignore all that evidence which corroborates their story that Lomax was the culprit and wanted them dead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* IdiotPlot: The story would have been a whole lot shorter if someone besides the main characters had actually taken a closer look at the oddly limp, quiet, and unresponsive person and realized he was that way because he was dead. Lampshaded a bit by the protagonists, along with some justification; everyone except for them is so incredibly self-centered that they ''can't'' notice.
to:
* IdiotPlot: IdiotPlot:
** The story would have been a whole lot shorter if someone besides the main characters had actually taken a closer look at the oddly limp, quiet, and unresponsive person and realized he was that way because he was dead. Lampshaded a bit by the protagonists, along with some justification; everyone except for them is so incredibly self-centered that they ''can't''notice.notice.
** In the sequel. The company blaming Larry and Richard for the embezzlement and firing them is understandable. Except Lomax left behind an audio recording of him wanting the two dead, a briefcase full of cash and a rather silly unsigned suicide/confession note with ''his fingerprints on it that he typed on his own typewriter''. It's ridiculous that they'd ignore all that evidence which corroborates their story that Lomax was the culprit and wanted them dead.
** The story would have been a whole lot shorter if someone besides the main characters had actually taken a closer look at the oddly limp, quiet, and unresponsive person and realized he was that way because he was dead. Lampshaded a bit by the protagonists, along with some justification; everyone except for them is so incredibly self-centered that they ''can't''
** In the sequel. The company blaming Larry and Richard for the embezzlement and firing them is understandable. Except Lomax left behind an audio recording of him wanting the two dead, a briefcase full of cash and a rather silly unsigned suicide/confession note with ''his fingerprints on it that he typed on his own typewriter''. It's ridiculous that they'd ignore all that evidence which corroborates their story that Lomax was the culprit and wanted them dead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* CommonKnowledge: It's pretty much a universal belief that the original movie as a whole is about two guys getting into crazy hijinks while dragging around the corpse of their dead boss and acting like he's still alive. In actuality, Bernie doesn't die until about a 3rd of the way through the film.
to:
* CommonKnowledge: It's pretty much a universal belief that the original movie as a whole is about two guys getting into crazy hijinks while dragging around the corpse of their dead boss and acting like pretending that he's still alive. In actuality, Bernie doesn't die until about a 3rd of the way through the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CommonKnowledge: It's pretty much a universal belief that the original movie as a whole is about two guys getting into crazy hijinks while dragging around the corpse of their dead boss and acting like he's still alive. In actuality, Bernie doesn't die until about a 3rd of the way through the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
** Vito. He could have been built up as the overall villain of both movies given that he was basically TheManBehindTheMan for Bernie and Paulie, but instead, he's completely forgotten about after his one scene.
to:
** Vito. He could have been built up as the overall villain of both movies given that he was basically TheManBehindTheMan for Bernie and Paulie, but instead, he's completely forgotten about after his one scene.scene apart from a later phone call.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Vito. He could have been built up as the overall villain of both movies given that he was basically TheManBehindTheMan for Bernie and Paulie, but instead, he's completely forgotten about after his one scene.
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter:
** Vito. He could have been built up as the overall villain of both movies given that he was basically TheManBehindTheMan for Bernie and Paulie, but instead, he's completely forgotten about after his onescene.scene.
** Gwen makes no appearances in the sequel. Not even the decency of being mentioned in dialogue. The sequel just acts like Gwen never even existed.
** Vito. He could have been built up as the overall villain of both movies given that he was basically TheManBehindTheMan for Bernie and Paulie, but instead, he's completely forgotten about after his one
** Gwen makes no appearances in the sequel. Not even the decency of being mentioned in dialogue. The sequel just acts like Gwen never even existed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* {{Sequelitis}}: As mentioned above,one can like the sequel for doubling down on the ridiculousness. But the consensus is that it is a forced attempt at getting more from a joke that was alredy stretched for a whole movie.
to:
* {{Sequelitis}}: As mentioned above,one above, one can like the sequel for doubling down on the ridiculousness. But the consensus is that it is a forced attempt at getting more from a joke that was alredy stretched for a whole movie.