Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not a video game
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* SidetrackedByTheGoldSaucer: This is how many of the modern churchgoers are portrayed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Russell is [[DesignatedHero supposed to be our protaganist]], but thinks the future is so awful and sinful for the crimes of having indecent secular media and women dressing skimpy. That and [[WhatAnIdiot he appears to be a moron]] since a lot of the things he's shocked by, such as water fountains, existed in his era as well. In short, he's a G-rated idiot freaking out at PG-rated things in a film that the filmmakers crapped into the NC-17 rated real world.
to:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Russell is [[DesignatedHero supposed to be our protaganist]], but thinks the future is so awful and sinful for the crimes of having indecent secular media and women dressing skimpy. That That, and [[WhatAnIdiot he appears to be a moron]] moron since a lot of the things he's shocked by, such as water fountains, existed in his era as well. In short, he's a G-rated idiot freaking out at PG-rated things in a film that the filmmakers crapped into the NC-17 rated real world.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* CriticalResearchFailure: Believe it or not, the film industry did exist before the 1930s and UsefulNotes/TheHaysCode (in fact, it started in the 1890s, ironically enough). All the things Russell complains of about the future already existed in his time too, and most of them were far worse, making him come off as extremely sheltered.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The creators might try to defend this by alleging those problems are worse now even if they existed then, which is false.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* CriticalResearchFailure: Believe it or not, the film industry did exist before the 1930s and UsefulNotes/TheHaysCode (in fact, it started in the 1890s, ironically enough). All the things Russell complains of about the future already existed in his time too, making him come off as extremely sheltered.
to:
* CriticalResearchFailure: Believe it or not, the film industry did exist before the 1930s and UsefulNotes/TheHaysCode (in fact, it started in the 1890s, ironically enough). All the things Russell complains of about the future already existed in his time too, and most of them were far worse, making him come off as extremely sheltered.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* CriticalResearchFailure: Believe it or not, the film industry did exist before the 1930s and UsefulNotes/TheHaysCode.
to:
* CriticalResearchFailure: Believe it or not, the film industry did exist before the 1930s and UsefulNotes/TheHaysCode.UsefulNotes/TheHaysCode (in fact, it started in the 1890s, ironically enough). All the things Russell complains of about the future already existed in his time too, making him come off as extremely sheltered.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Russell is [[DesignatedHero supposed to be our protaganist]], but thinks the future is so awful and sinful for the crimes of having indecent secular media and women dressing skimpy. That and [[WhatAnIdiot he appears to be a moron]] since a lot of the things he's shocked by, such as water fountains, existed in his era as well. In short, he's a G-rated idiot freaking out at PG-rated things in a film that the filmmakers crapped into NC-17 rated real world.
to:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Russell is [[DesignatedHero supposed to be our protaganist]], but thinks the future is so awful and sinful for the crimes of having indecent secular media and women dressing skimpy. That and [[WhatAnIdiot he appears to be a moron]] since a lot of the things he's shocked by, such as water fountains, existed in his era as well. In short, he's a G-rated idiot freaking out at PG-rated things in a film that the filmmakers crapped into the NC-17 rated real world.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Russell is [[DesignatedHero supposed to be our protaganist]], but thinks the future is so awful and sinful for the crimes of having indecent secular media and women dressing skimpy. That and [[WhatAnIdiot he appears to be a moron]] since a lot of the things he's shocked by, such as water fountains, existed in his era as well.
to:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Russell is [[DesignatedHero supposed to be our protaganist]], but thinks the future is so awful and sinful for the crimes of having indecent secular media and women dressing skimpy. That and [[WhatAnIdiot he appears to be a moron]] since a lot of the things he's shocked by, such as water fountains, existed in his era as well. In short, he's a G-rated idiot freaking out at PG-rated things in a film that the filmmakers crapped into NC-17 rated real world.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed Family Unfriendly Aesop to Hard Truth Aesop, moved it to the main page, and deleted it here.
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Russell's original manuscript was actually rather progressive ([[TheFundamentalist for him]]), as it advocated being a good person and doing good deeds because it's the morally right thing to do, rather than doing so because of your religious faith. In the end, he's convinced by the "evil" future where people actually follow this and have become more non-religious as a result, that you can ''only'' be a good person if you accept the Lord.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 3,6 (click to see context) :
* FridgeLogic:
** Russell's friend tells him the time machine can't be used to bring objects back in time if those objects haven't been made yet. By that logic, how can Russell travel forward in time since he would be (and is even mentioned to be) long since dead in the present?
** The film concludes with a character attempting to send a Bible into the future, reasoning that the date it fails will indicate TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt. But according to the Bible itself, no one can know the day or the hour of the End of Days.
** Russell is shocked by seeing the future that would result from publishing his book-- a future that amounts to our present day. So, back in his time, he decides to rewrite the book. But given [[ForWantOfANail the Butterfly Effect]], shouldn't the edits to the book alter the future? Or is Russell's theology book not as influential as he thinks?
** Russell's friend tells him the time machine can't be used to bring objects back in time if those objects haven't been made yet. By that logic, how can Russell travel forward in time since he would be (and is even mentioned to be) long since dead in the present?
** The film concludes with a character attempting to send a Bible into the future, reasoning that the date it fails will indicate TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt. But according to the Bible itself, no one can know the day or the hour of the End of Days.
** Russell is shocked by seeing the future that would result from publishing his book-- a future that amounts to our present day. So, back in his time, he decides to rewrite the book. But given [[ForWantOfANail the Butterfly Effect]], shouldn't the edits to the book alter the future? Or is Russell's theology book not as influential as he thinks?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Russell is [[DesignatedHero supposed to be our protagagist]], but thinks the future is so awful and sinful for the crimes of having indecent secular media and women dressing skimpy. That and [[WhatAnIdiot he appears to be a moron]] since a lot of the things he's shocked by such as water fountains existing in his era as well.
to:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Russell is [[DesignatedHero supposed to be our protagagist]], protaganist]], but thinks the future is so awful and sinful for the crimes of having indecent secular media and women dressing skimpy. That and [[WhatAnIdiot he appears to be a moron]] since a lot of the things he's shocked by by, such as water fountains existing fountains, existed in his era as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* CriticalResearchFailure: Believe it or not, the film industry did exist before the 1930s and the Hays Code.
to:
* CriticalResearchFailure: Believe it or not, the film industry did exist before the 1930s and the Hays Code.UsefulNotes/TheHaysCode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Russell is shocked by seeing the future that would result from publishing his book-- a future that amounts to our present day. So, back in his time, he decides to rewrite the book. But given TheButterflyEffect, shouldn't the edits to the book alter the future?
to:
** Russell is shocked by seeing the future that would result from publishing his book-- a future that amounts to our present day. So, back in his time, he decides to rewrite the book. But given TheButterflyEffect, [[ForWantOfANail the Butterfly Effect]], shouldn't the edits to the book alter the future? Or is Russell's theology book not as influential as he thinks?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Russell is shocked by seeing the future that would result from publishing his book-- a future that amounts to our present day. So, back in his time, he decides to rewrite the book. But given TheButterflyEffect, shouldn't the edits to the book alter the future?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* FridgeLogic: Russell's friend tells him the time machine can't be used to bring objects back in time if those objects haven't been made yet. By that logic, how can Russell travel forward in time since he would be (and is even mentioned to be) long since dead in the present?
to:
* FridgeLogic: FridgeLogic:
** Russell's friend tells him the time machine can't be used to bring objects back in time if those objects haven't been made yet. By that logic, how can Russell travel forward in time since he would be (and is even mentioned to be) long since dead in thepresent?present?
** The film concludes with a character attempting to send a Bible into the future, reasoning that the date it fails will indicate TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt. But according to the Bible itself, no one can know the day or the hour of the End of Days.
** Russell's friend tells him the time machine can't be used to bring objects back in time if those objects haven't been made yet. By that logic, how can Russell travel forward in time since he would be (and is even mentioned to be) long since dead in the
** The film concludes with a character attempting to send a Bible into the future, reasoning that the date it fails will indicate TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt. But according to the Bible itself, no one can know the day or the hour of the End of Days.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Russell is [[DesignatedHero supposed to be our protagagist]], but thinks the future is so awful and sinful for the crimes of having indecent secular media and women dressing skimpy. That and [[WhatAnIdiot he appears to be a moron]] since a lot of the things he's shocked by such as water fountains existing in his era as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Russell's original manuscript was actually rather progressive ([[TheFundamentalist for him]]), as it advocated being a good person and doing good deeds because it's the morally right thing to do, rather than doing so because of your religious faith. In the end, he's convinced by the "evil" future where people actually follow this and have become more non-secular as a result, that you can ''only'' be a good person if you accept the Lord.
to:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Russell's original manuscript was actually rather progressive ([[TheFundamentalist for him]]), as it advocated being a good person and doing good deeds because it's the morally right thing to do, rather than doing so because of your religious faith. In the end, he's convinced by the "evil" future where people actually follow this and have become more non-secular non-religious as a result, that you can ''only'' be a good person if you accept the Lord.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FridgeLogic: Russell's friend tells him the time machine can't be used to bring objects back in time if those objects haven't been made yet. By that logic, how can Russell travel forward in time since he would be (and is even mentioned to be) long since dead in the present?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Russell's original manuscript was actually rather progressive ([[TheFundamentalist for him]]), as it advocated being a good person and doing good deeds because it's the morally right thing to do, rather than doing so because of your religious faith. In the end, he's convinced by the "evil" future where people actually follow this and have become more non-secular as a result, that you can ''only'' be a good person if you accept the Lord.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) :
* SpecialEffectFailure: Why does it look like there's plastic in the time machine?
** To be fair, [[OlderThanTheyThink plastic was around in 1890]]...
** To be fair, [[OlderThanTheyThink plastic was around in 1890]]...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* SidetrackedByTheGoldSaucer -- this is how many of the modern churchgoers are portrayed.
to:
* SidetrackedByTheGoldSaucer -- this SidetrackedByTheGoldSaucer: This is how many of the modern churchgoers are portrayed.
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** To be fair, [[OlderThanTheyThink plastic was around in 1890]]...
to:
** To be fair, [[OlderThanTheyThink plastic was around in 1890]]...1890]]...
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* {{Narm}}: The desperate attempts by this film to show immorality while still clinging to a tight, constrictive moral code make them ''hilarious''. Example: young people singing the joys of alcohol. Not a specific ''type'' of alcoholic drink, alcohol ''itself''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* SpecialEffectFailure: Why does it look like there's plastic in the time machine?
to:
* SpecialEffectFailure: Why does it look like there's plastic in the time machine?machine?
** To be fair, [[OlderThanTheyThink plastic was around in 1890]]...
** To be fair, [[OlderThanTheyThink plastic was around in 1890]]...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SidetrackedByTheGoldSaucer -- this is how many of the modern churchgoers are portrayed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* CriticalResearchFailure: Believe it or not, the film industry did exist before the 1930s and the Hays Code.
to:
* SpecialEffectFailure: Why does it look like there's plastic in the time machine?