Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / ThePassionOfTheChrist

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
zero context


* IronWoobie: The film is about what may as well be the UrExample.



* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: See the description on the main page.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
NRLEP


** [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids Hearing children in the movie theater while watching the film.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
YMMV cannot be played with


* AdaptationDisplacement: Averted, of course. The source material ''is'' a huge best-seller, after all.

Added: 853

Changed: 597

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments: After Jesus is nailed to the cross, the soldiers flip the cross over to make sure the nails are secured from the reverse. At this point, Jesus should be flat on his face - as if everything else he's been through wasn't enough - but, as Magdalene sees (and us from the angle) Jesus is about an inch or so above ground, high enough for him to turn and gaze at her. Something like that is normally impossible without something like, say, divine intervention? Heartwarming to know that, while all the suffering is part of the plan, it could be interpreted as God's sign that he hadn't abandoned Jesus.

to:

* SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments: SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments:
**
After Jesus is nailed to the cross, the soldiers flip the cross over to make sure the nails are secured from the reverse. At this point, Jesus should be flat on his face - as if everything else he's been through wasn't enough - but, as Magdalene sees (and us from the angle) Jesus is about an inch or so above ground, high enough for him to turn and gaze at her. Something like that is normally impossible without something like, say, divine intervention? Heartwarming to know that, while all the suffering is part of the plan, it could be interpreted as God's sign that he hadn't abandoned Jesus.Jesus.
** Jesus' flashback to his time as a simple carpenter showing Mary his long-legged table. Considering all the responsibilities and hardships he goes through, it's kind of cute to see the Messiah just laughing and having a nice mother-son bonding moment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GermansLoveDavidHasselhoff: The film was received especially well outside the United States in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish colonial influence remains predominant, such as Mexico and other Latin American countries and the Philippines in Asia. Its particular style of religious imagery resonated more strongly in these regions because of the lack of percieved ValuesDissonance, mainly for two reason: First, while many modern Protestants and even modern Catholics in the West may be unnerved and turned off by the blood, it was ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering and death, which was introduced to Latin America and the Philippines by missionaries in the late Middle Ages, and thus a deeply influential part of their cultures today. Second, these countries have historically neglible Jewish populations, so the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue.

to:

* GermansLoveDavidHasselhoff: The film was received especially well outside the United States in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish colonial influence remains predominant, such as Mexico and other Latin American countries and the Philippines in Asia. Its particular style of religious imagery resonated more strongly in these regions because of the lack of percieved ValuesDissonance, mainly for two reason: reasons: First, while many modern Protestants and even modern Catholics in the West may be unnerved and turned off by the blood, it was ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering and death, which was introduced to Latin America and the Philippines by missionaries in the late Middle Ages, and thus a deeply influential part of their cultures today. Second, these countries have historically neglible Jewish populations, so the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GermansLoveDavidHasselhoff: The film was received especially well outside the United States in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish colonial influence remains predominant, such as Mexico and other Latin American countries and the Philippines in Asia. Its particular style of religious imagery resonated more strongly in these regions because of the lack of percieved ValuesDissonance, mainly for two reasons: first while many modern Protestants and even modern Catholics in the West may be unnerved and turned off by the blood, it was ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering and death, which was introduced to Latin America and the Philippines by missionaries in the late Middle Ages, and thus a deeply influential part of their cultures today. Second, these countries have historically neglible Jewish populations, so the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue.

to:

* GermansLoveDavidHasselhoff: The film was received especially well outside the United States in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish colonial influence remains predominant, such as Mexico and other Latin American countries and the Philippines in Asia. Its particular style of religious imagery resonated more strongly in these regions because of the lack of percieved ValuesDissonance, mainly for two reasons: first reason: First, while many modern Protestants and even modern Catholics in the West may be unnerved and turned off by the blood, it was ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering and death, which was introduced to Latin America and the Philippines by missionaries in the late Middle Ages, and thus a deeply influential part of their cultures today. Second, these countries have historically neglible Jewish populations, so the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GermansLoveDavidHasselhoff: The film was received especially well outside the United States in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish colonial influence remains predominant, such as Latin America and the Philippines in Asia. Its particular style of religious imagery resonated more strongly in these regions because of the lack of percieved ValuesDissonance, mainly for two reasons: first while many modern Protestants and even modern Catholics in the West may be unnerved and turned off by the blood, it was ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering and death, which was introduced to Latin America and the Philippines by missionaries in the late Middle Ages, and thus a deeply influential part of their cultures today. Second, these countries have historically neglible Jewish populations, so the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue.

to:

* GermansLoveDavidHasselhoff: The film was received especially well outside the United States in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish colonial influence remains predominant, such as Mexico and other Latin America American countries and the Philippines in Asia. Its particular style of religious imagery resonated more strongly in these regions because of the lack of percieved ValuesDissonance, mainly for two reasons: first while many modern Protestants and even modern Catholics in the West may be unnerved and turned off by the blood, it was ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering and death, which was introduced to Latin America and the Philippines by missionaries in the late Middle Ages, and thus a deeply influential part of their cultures today. Second, these countries have historically neglible Jewish populations, so the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue.

Added: 903

Changed: 3

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalDissonance: Reception to the film was understandably split down the middle by critics due to its subject matter. However, a good portion Christian filmgoers view the film as an excellent adaptation of this part of the New Testament.

to:

* CriticalDissonance: Reception to the film was understandably split down the middle by critics due to its subject matter. However, a good portion of Christian filmgoers view the film as an excellent adaptation of this part of the New Testament.


Added DiffLines:

* GermansLoveDavidHasselhoff: The film was received especially well outside the United States in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish colonial influence remains predominant, such as Latin America and the Philippines in Asia. Its particular style of religious imagery resonated more strongly in these regions because of the lack of percieved ValuesDissonance, mainly for two reasons: first while many modern Protestants and even modern Catholics in the West may be unnerved and turned off by the blood, it was ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering and death, which was introduced to Latin America and the Philippines by missionaries in the late Middle Ages, and thus a deeply influential part of their cultures today. Second, these countries have historically neglible Jewish populations, so the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Mary rushing to comfort Jesus as best she can, cut with flashbacks to her doing the same thing when he was just a tiny little boy with a skinned knee.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OvershadowedByControversy: Most of the discourse surrounding the film is based less on its artistic and theological merits and more on its graphic content and the accusations of antisemitism lobbied against it.

Added: 630

Changed: 618

Removed: 136

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CrowningMomentOfAwesome: All the suffering that Christ goes through in the film makes the resurrection scene that much more effective.



* SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments: After Jesus is nailed to the cross, the soldiers flip the cross over to make sure the nails are secured from the reverse. At this point, Jesus should be flat on his face - as if everything else he's been through wasn't enough - but, as Magdalene sees (and us from the angle) Jesus is about an inch or so above ground, high enough for him to turn and gaze at her. Something like that is normally impossible without something like, say, divine intervention? Heartwarming to know that, while all the suffering is part of the plan, it could be interpreted as God's sign that he hadn't abandoned Jesus.



* HeartwarmingMoments: After Jesus is nailed to the cross, the soldiers flip the cross over to make sure the nails are secured from the reverse. At this point, Jesus should be flat on his face - as if everything else he's been through wasn't enough - but, as Magdalene sees (and us from the angle) Jesus is about an inch or so above ground, high enough for him to turn and gaze at her. Something like that is normally impossible without something like, say, divine intervention? Heartwarming to know that, while all the suffering is part of the plan, it could be interpreted as God's sign that he hadn't abandoned Jesus.

to:

* HeartwarmingMoments: After Jesus is nailed to the cross, the soldiers flip the cross over to make sure the nails are secured from the reverse. At this point, Jesus should be flat on his face - as if everything else he's been through wasn't enough - but, as Magdalene sees (and us from the angle) Jesus is about an inch or so above ground, high enough for him to turn and gaze at her. Something like that is normally impossible without something like, say, divine intervention? Heartwarming to know that, while all SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome: All the suffering is part of the plan, it could be interpreted as God's sign that he hadn't abandoned Jesus.Christ goes through in the film makes the resurrection scene that much more effective.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: While Jim Caviezel did [[DyeingForYourArt injure himself at times]], the flagellation is done by combining realistic make-up and visual effects to make it seem as if flesh is being torn. Also, once Jesus is nailed, when it's full-bodied it's a life-like animatronic, enough to make bystanders in the Italian set worried for the "actor's" health.

to:

* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: While Jim Caviezel did [[DyeingForYourArt injure himself at times]], the flagellation is done by combining realistic make-up and visual effects to make it seem as if flesh is being torn. Also, once Jesus is nailed, when it's full-bodied it's a life-like animatronic, enough to make bystanders in the Italian set worried for the "actor's" health.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
there are plenty of well-written articles that give good reason to believe this film does have anti-semitic stuff in it:https://www.ncronline.org/news/media/decade-later-passion-still-raises-questions-anti-semitism also this entry largely comes off as one troper imposing their own views on everyone else, and there's plenty of religious folks who hated it


* MisBlamed: The Anti-Semitic claims in particular and certain historical variances. Whatever Gibson's personal views this film is largely no better/no worse then [[Literature/TheBible the work]] it's based on. It enjoyed broad support from Church leaders across denominations precisely because it was felt to be a [[JustForPun faithful]] adaptation, and most support includes the note that they did ''not'' feel it promoted anti-Semitism, nor did they think it should have.
** Complaints that it focuses on Jesus' capture and execution are particularly odd, since that is literally [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passion_%28Christianity%29 the title of the movie.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CompleteMonster: Satan screaming [[TheDevilIsALoser his head off in a tantrum]] at the few Jesus saves. That's right, ''the few''. The vast [[HumansAreBastards majority of mankind]] is [[NoSympathyForGrudgeholders still doomed]] as [[DependingOnTheWriter Universalism is not explictly shown to be in effect]], they can [[ThisIsUnforgivable now choose to damn themselves]]. Having caused nothing but [[ForTheEvulz but misery for mankind]] before then, driving everyone to their deaths, all while [[EvilGloating smirking at their demise]], and [[CessationOfExistence total destruction]], the fact that ''some'' got saved causes the devil [[VillainousBreakdown to really flip out]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CompleteMonster: Satan screaming [[TheDevilIsALoser his head off in a tantrum]] at the few Jesus saves. That's right, ''the few''. The vast [[HumansAreBastards majority of mankind]] is [[NoSympathyForGrudgeholders still doomed]] as [[DependingOnTheWriter Universalism is not explictly shown to be in effect]], they can [[ThisIsUnforgivable now choose to damn themselves]]. Having caused nothing but [[ForTheEvulz but misery for mankind]] before then, driving everyone to their deaths, all while [[EvilGloating smirking at their demise]], and [[CessationOfExistence total destruction]], the fact that ''some'' got saved causes the devil [[VillainousBreakdown to really flip out]].


* BrokenBase: The amount of violence and detail surrounding the crucifying of Jesus. While it is mostly accurate to how bloody actual ones were, some have argued that the film focuses too much on it and not enough on the reasons as to why Jesus went through them, and why his sacrifice meant so much to humanity.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added: 264

Changed: 147

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EnsembleDarkhorse: Mary. While this is especially true for Catholics, Maia Morgenstern's performance has been credited with increasing Evangelical devotion to Mary.

to:

* EnsembleDarkhorse: EnsembleDarkhorse
**
Mary. While this is especially true for Catholics, Maia Morgenstern's performance has been credited with increasing Evangelical devotion to Mary.Mary.
** Pontius Pilate and his wife have been appreciated for their humanizing portrayal as conflicted authority figures.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Most of the facts here aren't even true.


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Jesus is not actually the messiah, he is a well-meaning charlatan with delusions of granduer who blasphemes against the established Jewish religion, makes terroristic threats to destroy the temple, and foments insurrection against the peaceful Roman occupation by convincing his followers to stop paying tribute to the emperor. He dies of his injuries on the cross. The storm, of course, can be explained as a regular freak accident, and Jesus’s resurrection at the end is a fanciful dream of his bereaved followers rather than an actual occurrence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The first half of this isn't true, and the other half is dependent on how you interpret his words.


* DesignatedHero: Jesus. He persuades his followers not to pay their taxes (which the government uses to do things like build roads and fund the military), foments insurrection against the Roman occupation (which, at the time, seems to be entirely peaceful; we only see examples of brutality after Jesus's arrest), proclaims himself the true king of the Jews (despite being nothing but a peasant carpenter; this also challenges the authority of Herod, the legitimate king), and threatens to destroy the temple (which, in modern times, would be considered religious intolerance and making terroristic threats). It's honestly a wonder he wasn't executed sooner.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The {{Gorn}} that this film is so infamous for is meant to make the viewers empathize with Jesus. And it does work quite well with some people, but not with others. Many viewers just stop caring after all the violence they see.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DesignatedHero: Jesus. He persuades his followers not to pay their taxes (which the government uses to do things like build roads and fund the military), foments insurrection against the Roman occupation (which, at the time, seems to be entirely peaceful; we only see examples of brutality after Jesus's arrest), proclaims himself the true king of the Jews (despite being nothing but a peasant carpenter; this also challenges the authority of Herod, the legitimate king), and threatens to destroy the temple (which, in modern times, would be considered religious intolerance and making terroristic threats). It's honestly a wonder he wasn't executed sooner.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Jesus is not actually the messiah, he is a charlatan who blasphemes against the established Jewish religion, makes terroristic threats to destroy the temple, and foments insurrection against the peaceful Roman occupation by convincing his followers to stop paying tribute to the emperor. He dies of his injuries on the cross. The storm, of course, can be explained as a regular freak accident, and Jesus’s resurrection at the end is a fanciful dream of his bereaved followers rather than an actual occurrence.

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Jesus is not actually the messiah, he is a well-meaning charlatan with delusions of granduer who blasphemes against the established Jewish religion, makes terroristic threats to destroy the temple, and foments insurrection against the peaceful Roman occupation by convincing his followers to stop paying tribute to the emperor. He dies of his injuries on the cross. The storm, of course, can be explained as a regular freak accident, and Jesus’s resurrection at the end is a fanciful dream of his bereaved followers rather than an actual occurrence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Jesus is not actually the messiah, he is a charlatan who blasphemes against the established Jewish religion, makes terroristic threats to destroy the temple, and foments insurrection against the peaceful Roman occupation by convincing his followers to stop paying tribute to the emperor. He dies of his injuries on the cross. The storm, of course, can be explained as a regular freak accident, and Jesus’s resurrection at the end is a fanciful dream of his bereaved followers rather than an actual occurrence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Satan and her evil old man baby, never again referenced. Just Jesus looking out, seeing Satan, and Satan has something in her arms...''ahhh-get-it-away-it's-horrible-and-I-have-no-words-to-describe-the-horror.'' Some claim it'd might be a Satanic mockery of Mary and Baby Jesus, while others theorize the baby is the Anti-Christ, but the film itself ha no answer.

to:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Satan and her evil old man baby, never again referenced. Just Jesus looking out, seeing Satan, and Satan has something in her arms...''ahhh-get-it-away-it's-horrible-and-I-have-no-words-to-describe-the-horror.'' Some claim it'd might be a Satanic mockery of Mary and Baby Jesus, while others theorize the baby is the Anti-Christ, but the film itself ha has no answer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tearjerker: Besides Mary and Mary Magdalene's horrified tears of pain, we have a divine tear shed as we see a single drop of rain fall (from a god's eye view camera no less) just after Jesus dies.

to:

* Tearjerker: {{Tearjerker}}: Besides Mary and Mary Magdalene's horrified tears of pain, we have a divine tear shed as we see a single drop of rain fall (from a god's eye view camera no less) just after Jesus dies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Tearjerker: Besides Mary and Mary Magdalene's horrified tears of pain, we have a divine tear shed as we see a single drop of rain fall (from a god's eye view camera no less) just after Jesus dies.

Changed: 181

Removed: 172

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Satan and her evil old man baby, never again referenced. Just Jesus looking out, seeing Satan, and Satan has something in her arms...''ahhh-get-it-away-it's-horrible-and-I-have-no-words-to-describe-the-horror.'' For obvious reasons, Satan's baby has already been referenced under NightmareFuel.
** According to religious sources, it's supposed to be a Satanic mockery of Mary and Baby Jesus.
** Several people watching the movie identified the baby as the Anti-Christ.

to:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Satan and her evil old man baby, never again referenced. Just Jesus looking out, seeing Satan, and Satan has something in her arms...''ahhh-get-it-away-it's-horrible-and-I-have-no-words-to-describe-the-horror.'' For obvious reasons, Satan's baby has already been referenced under NightmareFuel.
** According to religious sources, it's supposed to
Some claim it'd might be a Satanic mockery of Mary and Baby Jesus.
** Several people watching the movie identified
Jesus, while others theorize the baby as is the Anti-Christ.Anti-Christ, but the film itself ha no answer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: While Jim Caviezel did [[DyeingForYourArt injure himself at times]], the flagellation is done by combining realistic make-up and visual effects to make it seem as if flesh is being torn. Also, once Jesus is nailed, when it's full-bodied it's a life-like animatronic, enough to make bystanders in the Italian set worried for the "actor's" health.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
As pointed out by the counter examples, the film makes no attempt to absolve the Romans of guilt for the execution.


* OlderThanTheyThink: Some Biblical scholars think that the Gospels of Luke and John in particular (partially) try to absolve the Romans of responsibility for the Crucifixion so that Christians would not be considered enemies of the Roman Empire.
** Not ''this'' movie, though! Check out the smirks and leers on the torturers' faces as they thoroughly enjoy their work. These Romans are so eager to be cruel that you start wondering [[KickTheDog what they do]] to [[ItAmusedMe keep from getting bored]] when they ''don't'' have Jesus to torture. Considering that they were the ones to invent GladiatorGames, the predisposition for cruelty is perhaps not that far off.
** Romans hated the Jews with passion, and the Jews returned the honor. This is why the Jewish Revolts ended with such bloodshed, enough to be scary even to people from their age, who were no slouches when it came to death and destruction.

Top