Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / ThePassionOfTheChrist

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** He's beaten up by Jewish guards, slapped around by the Sanhedrin priests, beaten up by the people in the Temple, scourged so bad by Roman soldiers that his ribs are bared (with an officer explicitly saying they went too far and weren't supposed to beat him to death), has a crown of thorns put on his head (and pushed into his eyes), whipped through the streets while carrying a cross, beaten up and pelted with stones by Jewish mobs, and -- after they dislocate his arm to fit the cross -- he is finally nailed to the cross. It CrossesTheLineTwice when the Roman officer orders his men to put Jesus out of his misery by breaking his legs with a sledgehammer. Though of course, as per the Bible, when the soldiers saw that Jesus was already dead, they didn't break his legs. [[note]]Some scientists believe that when someone is crucified, breaking their legs would leave them unable to support themselves enough to breathe, thus hastening their death. The other two crucified men get this treatment too.[[/note]]

to:

** He's beaten up by Jewish guards, slapped around by the Sanhedrin priests, beaten up by the people in the Temple, scourged so bad by Roman soldiers that his ribs are bared (with an officer explicitly saying they went too far and weren't supposed to beat him to death), has a crown of thorns put on his head (and pushed into his eyes), whipped through the streets while carrying a cross, beaten up and pelted with stones by Jewish mobs, and -- after they dislocate his arm to fit the cross -- he is finally nailed to the cross. It CrossesTheLineTwice when the Roman officer orders his men to put Jesus out of his misery by breaking his legs with a sledgehammer. Though of course, as per the Bible, when the soldiers saw that Jesus was already dead, they didn't break his legs. [[note]]Some scientists believe that when [[note]]When someone is crucified, breaking their legs would leave them unable to support themselves enough to breathe, thus hastening their death. The other two crucified men get this treatment too.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AudienceAlienatingPremise: The controversial film has been called out by detractors for glorifying the violence Jesus suffered, and not his teachings, of which we get only a few passing references. David Edelstein called it "a two-hour-and-six-minute snuff movie". Robert Wilonsky critically stated, he found the movie "too turgid to awe the nonbelievers, too zealous to inspire, and often too silly to take seriously, with its demonic hallucinations that look like escapees from a Creator/DavidLynch film".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved to it’s own page


* NightmareFuel: The entire film is this, but Satan and the demon children are especially disturbing.
** Honorable mention goes to the monster beneath the bridge and the face-morphing children who harass Judas, too.
** While Jesus' torture is over the top, [[TruthInTelevision these methods were historically used by the Romans.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Amongst the global Christian audience, the film was received especially well in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish influences remain predominant, such as Spain, Latin America, and the Philippines in Southeast Asia, as its particular style of religious imagery resonates more strongly there because of two reasons. First, while many modern Protestants (and even modern Catholics in other countries) may be unnerved and turned off by all the blood and violence, it was in fact ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering, torture and death, which Spain favored and introduced in their conquered territories, and thus it's a deeply influential part of Hispanic cultures today (entering one of their chapels as an "outsider" can feel like entering a horror film, not to mention the Spanish Holy Week, which often features real penitents self-harming and bleeding all over despite such activity being "officially" discouraged by the Church). Second, as Spain had [[UsefulNotes/TomasDeTorquemada forcefully Christianized its Jewish population]] even before their conquests of America and the Philippines started, this means these regions have historically negligible Jewish populations, and Spain conquering lands in different continents altogether further distanced the people there from that kind of stuff happening in Europe.[[note]]For instance, the Philippines has a tiny, tiny Jewish minority with ''very'' recent roots, refugees fleeing the Holocaust who got in before the Japanese invaded the country, and most Filipinos aren't even aware about this bit of their history (in contrast to their much larger Muslim minority, as Islam predated Spanish Roman Catholicism in some areas by about two centuries).[[/note]] So the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue in these places, with many of these people not being even aware that anti-Semitism in the movie exists or can be identified to begin with.

to:

** Amongst the global Christian audience, the film was received especially well in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish influences remain predominant, such as Spain, Latin America, and the Philippines in Southeast Asia, as its particular style of religious imagery resonates more strongly there because of two reasons. First, while many modern Protestants (and even modern Catholics in other countries) may be unnerved and turned off by all the blood and violence, it was in fact ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, [[DarkerAndEdgier focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering, torture and death, death]], which Spain favored and introduced in their conquered territories, and thus it's a deeply influential part of Hispanic cultures today (entering one of their chapels as an "outsider" outsider can feel [[BloodierAndGorier like entering a horror film, film]], not to mention the Spanish Holy Week, which often features real penitents self-harming and bleeding all over despite such activity being "officially" formally discouraged by the Church). Second, as Spain had [[UsefulNotes/TomasDeTorquemada forcefully Christianized its Jewish population]] even before their conquests of America and the Philippines started, this means these regions have historically negligible Jewish populations, and Spain conquering lands in different continents altogether further distanced the people there from that kind of stuff happening in Europe.[[note]]For instance, the Philippines has a tiny, tiny Jewish minority with ''very'' recent roots, refugees fleeing the Holocaust who got in before the Japanese invaded the country, and most Filipinos aren't even aware about this bit of their history (in contrast to their much larger Muslim minority, as Islam predated Spanish Roman Catholicism in some areas by about two centuries).[[/note]] So the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue in these places, with many of these people not being even aware that anti-Semitism in the movie exists or can be identified to begin with.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OlderThanTheyThink: This wasn’t the first Literature/TheFourGospels adaptation to have {{Satan}} appearing to Jesus in the Garden Of Gethsemane. That honour belongs to WesternAnimation/TheMiracleMaker, Series/Jesus1999 and {{Film/Godspell}}.

to:

* OlderThanTheyThink: This wasn’t the first adaptation of Literature/TheFourGospels adaptation to have {{Satan}} appearing to Jesus in the Garden Of Gethsemane. That honour belongs to WesternAnimation/TheMiracleMaker, Series/Jesus1999 ''WesternAnimation/TheMiracleMaker'', ''Series/Jesus1999'' and {{Film/Godspell}}.''{{Film/Godspell}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OlderThanTheyThink: This wasn’t the first Literature/TheFourGospels adaptation to have {{Satan}} appearing to Jesus in the Garden Of Gethsemane. That honour belongs to WesternAnimation/TheMiracleMaker, Series/Jesus1999 and Film/Godspell.

to:

* OlderThanTheyThink: This wasn’t the first Literature/TheFourGospels adaptation to have {{Satan}} appearing to Jesus in the Garden Of Gethsemane. That honour belongs to WesternAnimation/TheMiracleMaker, Series/Jesus1999 and Film/Godspell.{{Film/Godspell}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OlderThanTheyThink: This wasn’t the first Literature/TheFourGospels adaptation to have {{Satan}} appearing to Jesus in the Garden Of Gethsemane. That honour belongs to WesternAnimation/TheMiracleMaker, Series/Jesus1999 and Film/Godspell.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Amongst the global Christian audience, the film was received especially well in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish influences remain predominant, such as Spain, Latin America, and the Philippines in Southeast Asia, as its particular style of religious imagery resonates more strongly there because of two reasons. First, while many modern Protestants (and even modern Catholics in other countries) may be unnerved and turned off by all the blood and violence, it was in fact ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering, torture and death, which Spain favored and introduced in their conquered territories, and thus it's a deeply influential part of Hispanic cultures today (where entering a chapel as an "outsider" can feel like entering a horror film, not to mention their Holy Week, which often features real penitents self-harming and bleeding all over despite such activity being "officially" discouraged by the Church). Second, as Spain had [[UsefulNotes/TheSpanishInquisition as Spain had forcefully Christianized its Jewish population]] even before their conquest of America and the Philippines started, this means these regions have historically negligible Jewish populations, and Spain conquering lands in different continents altogether further distanced the people there from that kind of stuff happening in Europe.[[note]]For instance, the Philippines has a tiny, tiny Jewish minority with ''very'' recent roots, refugees fleeing the Holocaust who got in before the Japanese invaded the country, and most Filipinos aren't even aware about this bit of their history (in contrast to their much larger Muslim minority, as Islam predated Spanish Roman Catholicism in some areas by about two centuries).[[/note]] So the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue in these places, with many of these people not being even aware that anti-Semitism in the movie exists or can be identified.

to:

** Amongst the global Christian audience, the film was received especially well in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish influences remain predominant, such as Spain, Latin America, and the Philippines in Southeast Asia, as its particular style of religious imagery resonates more strongly there because of two reasons. First, while many modern Protestants (and even modern Catholics in other countries) may be unnerved and turned off by all the blood and violence, it was in fact ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering, torture and death, which Spain favored and introduced in their conquered territories, and thus it's a deeply influential part of Hispanic cultures today (where entering a chapel (entering one of their chapels as an "outsider" can feel like entering a horror film, not to mention their the Spanish Holy Week, which often features real penitents self-harming and bleeding all over despite such activity being "officially" discouraged by the Church). Second, as Spain had [[UsefulNotes/TheSpanishInquisition as Spain had [[UsefulNotes/TomasDeTorquemada forcefully Christianized its Jewish population]] even before their conquest conquests of America and the Philippines started, this means these regions have historically negligible Jewish populations, and Spain conquering lands in different continents altogether further distanced the people there from that kind of stuff happening in Europe.[[note]]For instance, the Philippines has a tiny, tiny Jewish minority with ''very'' recent roots, refugees fleeing the Holocaust who got in before the Japanese invaded the country, and most Filipinos aren't even aware about this bit of their history (in contrast to their much larger Muslim minority, as Islam predated Spanish Roman Catholicism in some areas by about two centuries).[[/note]] So the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue in these places, with many of these people not being even aware that anti-Semitism in the movie exists or can be identified.identified to begin with.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SpiritualAntithesis: To Creator/PierPaoloPasolini's ''The Gospel According to Saint Matthew.'' Pasolini, an atheist and a Marxist, wanted to present the Gospel with its miraculous elements downplayed, so the ''political'' and revolutionary aspects of Christ's life could be empathized. Gibson's movie, made by a devout Traditionalist Catholic, puts the life of Christ in flashbacks, and puts all his attention on the atoning death of the cross.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Amongst the global Christian audience, the film was received especially well in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish influences remain predominant, such as Spain, Latin America, and the Philippines in Southeast Asia, as its particular style of religious imagery resonates more strongly there because of two reasons. First, while many modern Protestants (and even modern Catholics in other countries) may be unnerved and turned off by all the blood and violence, it was in fact ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering, torture and death, which Spain favored and introduced in their conquered territories, and thus it's a deeply influential part of Hispanic cultures today (where entering a chapel as an "outsider" can feel like entering a horror film, not to mention their Holy Week, which often still features real penitents self-harming and bleeding all over despite such activity "officially" being discouraged by the church). Second, [[UsefulNotes/TheSpanishInquisition as Spain had forcefully Christianized its Jewish population even before their conquest of America and the Philippines started]], this means these regions have historically negligible Jewish populations, and Spain colonizing lands in different continents/continental regions altogether further distanced the people there from that kind of stuff happening in Europe.[[note]] For instance, the Philippines has a tiny, tiny Jewish minority with ''very'' recent roots, refugees fleeing the Holocaust who got in before the Japanese invaded the country, and most Filipinos aren't even aware about this bit of their history (in contrast to their much larger Muslim minority, as Islam predated Spanish Roman Catholicism in some areas by about two centuries).[[/note]] So the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue in these places, with many of these people not being even aware that anti-Semitism in the movie exists or can be identified.

to:

** Amongst the global Christian audience, the film was received especially well in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish influences remain predominant, such as Spain, Latin America, and the Philippines in Southeast Asia, as its particular style of religious imagery resonates more strongly there because of two reasons. First, while many modern Protestants (and even modern Catholics in other countries) may be unnerved and turned off by all the blood and violence, it was in fact ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering, torture and death, which Spain favored and introduced in their conquered territories, and thus it's a deeply influential part of Hispanic cultures today (where entering a chapel as an "outsider" can feel like entering a horror film, not to mention their Holy Week, which often still features real penitents self-harming and bleeding all over despite such activity being "officially" being discouraged by the church). Church). Second, as Spain had [[UsefulNotes/TheSpanishInquisition as Spain had forcefully Christianized its Jewish population population]] even before their conquest of America and the Philippines started]], started, this means these regions have historically negligible Jewish populations, and Spain colonizing conquering lands in different continents/continental regions continents altogether further distanced the people there from that kind of stuff happening in Europe.[[note]] For [[note]]For instance, the Philippines has a tiny, tiny Jewish minority with ''very'' recent roots, refugees fleeing the Holocaust who got in before the Japanese invaded the country, and most Filipinos aren't even aware about this bit of their history (in contrast to their much larger Muslim minority, as Islam predated Spanish Roman Catholicism in some areas by about two centuries).[[/note]] So the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue in these places, with many of these people not being even aware that anti-Semitism in the movie exists or can be identified.

Added: 575

Changed: 10

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** He's beaten up by Jewish guards, slapped around by the Sanhedrin priests, beaten up by the people in the Temple, scourged so bad by Roman soldiers that his ribs are bared (with an officer explicitly saying they went too far and weren't supposed to beat him to death), has a crown of thorns put on his head (and pushed into his eyes), whipped through the streets while carrying a cross, beaten up and pelted with stones by Jewish mobs, and -- after they dislocate his arm to fit the cross -- he is finally nailed to the cross. It CrossesTheLineTwice when the Roman officer orders his men to put the dying Jesus out of his misery by breaking his legs with a sledgehammer. Though of course, as per the Bible, when the soldiers saw that Jesus was already dead, they didn't break his legs. [[note]]Some scientists believe that when someone is crucified, breaking their legs would leave them unable to support themselves enough to breathe, thus hastening their death. The other two crucified men get this treatment too.[[/note]]

to:

** He's beaten up by Jewish guards, slapped around by the Sanhedrin priests, beaten up by the people in the Temple, scourged so bad by Roman soldiers that his ribs are bared (with an officer explicitly saying they went too far and weren't supposed to beat him to death), has a crown of thorns put on his head (and pushed into his eyes), whipped through the streets while carrying a cross, beaten up and pelted with stones by Jewish mobs, and -- after they dislocate his arm to fit the cross -- he is finally nailed to the cross. It CrossesTheLineTwice when the Roman officer orders his men to put the dying Jesus out of his misery by breaking his legs with a sledgehammer. Though of course, as per the Bible, when the soldiers saw that Jesus was already dead, they didn't break his legs. [[note]]Some scientists believe that when someone is crucified, breaking their legs would leave them unable to support themselves enough to breathe, thus hastening their death. The other two crucified men get this treatment too.[[/note]]


Added DiffLines:

* FranchiseOriginalSin: The discussions and debates about anti-Semitism in the movie often brought up whether how much of that could be attributed to the Gospels themselves which were written by Jews about Jews, after all (except Luke, traditionally by the Gentile Luke) and how much can be attributed to the later cultural developments which Gibson drew upon. Most notably, the movie is not just a direct adaptation of the Gospels but draws heavily from ''The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ'', attributed to Anne Catherine Emmerich, a 19th-century Catholic nun.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** He's beaten up by Jewish guards, slapped around by the Sanhedrin priests, beaten up by the people in the Temple, scourged so bad by Roman soldiers that his ribs are bared, has a crown of thorns put on his head (and pushed into his eyes), whipped through the streets while carrying a cross, beaten up and pelted with stones by Jewish mobs, and -- after they dislocate his arm to fit the cross -- he is finally nailed to the cross. It CrossesTheLineTwice when the Roman officer orders his men to put the dying Jesus out of his misery by breaking his legs with a sledgehammer.[[note]] Though, of course, the Bible says that when the soldiers saw that Jesus was already dead, they didn't break his legs. Some scientists believe that when someone is crucified, breaking their legs would leave them unable to support themselves enough to breathe.[[/note]]

to:

** He's beaten up by Jewish guards, slapped around by the Sanhedrin priests, beaten up by the people in the Temple, scourged so bad by Roman soldiers that his ribs are bared, bared (with an officer explicitly saying they went too far and weren't supposed to beat him to death), has a crown of thorns put on his head (and pushed into his eyes), whipped through the streets while carrying a cross, beaten up and pelted with stones by Jewish mobs, and -- after they dislocate his arm to fit the cross -- he is finally nailed to the cross. It CrossesTheLineTwice when the Roman officer orders his men to put the dying Jesus out of his misery by breaking his legs with a sledgehammer.[[note]] Though, Though of course, as per the Bible says that Bible, when the soldiers saw that Jesus was already dead, they didn't break his legs. Some [[note]]Some scientists believe that when someone is crucified, breaking their legs would leave them unable to support themselves enough to breathe.breathe, thus hastening their death. The other two crucified men get this treatment too.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Applicability}}: While Creator/MelGibson rooted the film in a very traditionalist Catholic viewpoint on the Gospels, it wound up resonating most strongly with evangelical Christians. In its depiction of Jesus' crucifixion before a braying mob, they saw a metaphor for their own perceived marginalization within wider society, with the promise that they would one day inherit the Earth.

to:

* {{Applicability}}: While Creator/MelGibson rooted the film in a very traditionalist Western/Latin/Roman Catholic[[note]] as opposed to ''Eastern'' Catholic, i.e. the 23 other churches within the Catholic Church, besides the Latin/Roman church[[/note]] viewpoint on the Gospels, it wound up resonating most strongly with evangelical Christians. In its depiction of Jesus' crucifixion before a braying mob, they saw a metaphor for their own perceived marginalization within wider society, with the promise that they would one day inherit the Earth.



** Amongst the global Christian audience, the film was received especially well in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish influences remain predominant, such as Spain, Latin America and the Philippines, as its particular style of religious imagery resonates more strongly there because of two reasons. First, while many modern Protestants (and even modern Catholics in other countries) may be unnerved and turned off by all the blood and violence, it was in fact ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering, torture and death, which Spain favored and introduced in their conquered territories, and thus it's a deeply influential part of Hispanic cultures today (you can note it in modern Spain, where entering a chapel can feel like entering a horror film, not to mention their Holy Week, which often features real penitents bleeding all over). Second, [[UsefulNotes/TheSpanishInquisition as Spain had forcefully Christianized its Jewish population even before their conquest of America started]], this means these regions have historically negligible Jewish populations, so the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue, with many of these people not being even aware that anti-Semitism in the movie exists or can be identified.

to:

** Amongst the global Christian audience, the film was received especially well in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish influences remain predominant, such as Spain, Latin America America, and the Philippines, Philippines in Southeast Asia, as its particular style of religious imagery resonates more strongly there because of two reasons. First, while many modern Protestants (and even modern Catholics in other countries) may be unnerved and turned off by all the blood and violence, it was in fact ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering, torture and death, which Spain favored and introduced in their conquered territories, and thus it's a deeply influential part of Hispanic cultures today (you can note it in modern Spain, where (where entering a chapel as an "outsider" can feel like entering a horror film, not to mention their Holy Week, which often still features real penitents self-harming and bleeding all over). over despite such activity "officially" being discouraged by the church). Second, [[UsefulNotes/TheSpanishInquisition as Spain had forcefully Christianized its Jewish population even before their conquest of America and the Philippines started]], this means these regions have historically negligible Jewish populations, so and Spain colonizing lands in different continents/continental regions altogether further distanced the people there from that kind of stuff happening in Europe.[[note]] For instance, the Philippines has a tiny, tiny Jewish minority with ''very'' recent roots, refugees fleeing the Holocaust who got in before the Japanese invaded the country, and most Filipinos aren't even aware about this bit of their history (in contrast to their much larger Muslim minority, as Islam predated Spanish Roman Catholicism in some areas by about two centuries).[[/note]] So the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue, issue in these places, with many of these people not being even aware that anti-Semitism in the movie exists or can be identified.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Satan and her evil old man baby, never again referenced. Just Jesus looking out, seeing Satan, and Satan has a very horrible-looking creature in her arms... Some claim it might be a Satanic mockery of Mary and Baby Jesus, while others theorize the baby is the Anti-Christ, but the film itself has no answer.

to:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Satan and her his evil old man baby, never again referenced. Just Jesus looking out, seeing Satan, and Satan has a very horrible-looking creature in her his arms... Some claim it might be a Satanic mockery of Mary and Baby Jesus, while others theorize the baby is the Anti-Christ, but the film itself has no answer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Amongst the global Christian audience, the film was received especially well in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish influences remain predominant, such as Spain, Latin America and the Philippines, as its particular style of religious imagery resonates more strongly there because of two reasons. First, while many modern Protestants (and even modern Catholics in other countries) may be unnerved and turned off by all the blood and violence, it was in fact ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering, torture and death, which Spain favored and introduced in their conquered territories, and thus it's a deeply influential part of Hispanic cultures today (you can note it in modern Spain, where entering a chapel can feel like entering a horror film, not to mention their Holy Week, which often features real penitents bleeding all over). Second, as Spain had forcefully Christianized its Jewish population even before their conquest of America started, this means these regions have historically negligible Jewish populations, so the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue, with many of these people not being even aware that anti-Semitism in the movie exists or can be identified.

to:

** Amongst the global Christian audience, the film was received especially well in countries where Catholic and particularly Spanish influences remain predominant, such as Spain, Latin America and the Philippines, as its particular style of religious imagery resonates more strongly there because of two reasons. First, while many modern Protestants (and even modern Catholics in other countries) may be unnerved and turned off by all the blood and violence, it was in fact ''this'' flavor of Catholicism, focusing greatly on Jesus's suffering, torture and death, which Spain favored and introduced in their conquered territories, and thus it's a deeply influential part of Hispanic cultures today (you can note it in modern Spain, where entering a chapel can feel like entering a horror film, not to mention their Holy Week, which often features real penitents bleeding all over). Second, [[UsefulNotes/TheSpanishInquisition as Spain had forcefully Christianized its Jewish population even before their conquest of America started, started]], this means these regions have historically negligible Jewish populations, so the question of anti-Semitism simply wasn't much of a local issue, with many of these people not being even aware that anti-Semitism in the movie exists or can be identified.

Top