Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Spurlock's wife randomly informing us about their sex life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CrowningMomentOfFunny: Spurlock shows an image of supposedly a historical figure to a little boy. The boy identifies the image as George Bush. When Spurlock shows the image to the audience, it turns out to be ''Jesus.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* NeverLiveItDown: The film became this to [=McDonalds=]. Even if you haven't seen the film, you've probably at least heard about the sequence of Spurlock struggling to finish his Supersized meal and vomiting it in the parking lot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
** Also, the movie goes into detail on related problems, such as the relative lack of heatlhy food in school cafeterias (or the ease with which a student can have a lunch consisting of, say, an entire tray of french fries), or the difficulty that someone living in the city might have with actually buying significant quantities of healthy food if they can't afford to traavel far or lack much free time outside of work.
to:
** Also, the movie goes into detail on related problems, such as the relative lack of heatlhy food in school cafeterias (or the ease with which a student can have a lunch consisting of, say, an entire tray of french fries), or the difficulty that someone living in the city might have with actually buying significant quantities of healthy food if they can't afford to traavel travel far or lack much free time outside of work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped: While there's no real denying that this is a bit of a CaptainObviousAesop (excessive fast food is harmful to your health? Really?), a case can be made for this; the movie does spend a bit of time pointing out the reasons ''why'' this is the case, some of which are not entirely what you'd expect.
to:
* SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped: While there's no real denying that this is a bit of a CaptainObviousAesop (excessive fast food is harmful to your health? Really?), ''Really''?), a case can be made for this; the movie does spend a bit of time pointing out the reasons ''why'' this is the case, some of which are not entirely what you'd expect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped: While there's no real denying that this is a bit of a CaptainObviousAesop (excessive fast food is harmful to your health? Really?), a case can be made for this; the movie does spend a bit of time pointing out the reasons ''why'' this is the case, some of which are not entirely what you'd expect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* {{Anvilicious}}: While Spurlock does demonstrate the dangers of eating too much fast food, the documentary arguably does not demonize fast-food companies or the people who eat their food.
* DesignatedVillain: The movie makes [=McDonald's=] out to be a villain, even though the protagonist purposefully ignores all health advice, consumes in excess of twice the recommended calories for a sedentary male, and by all accounts actually fudged (or is unwilling to elaborate upon) the pertinent details, possibly up to consuming additional meals (at [=McDonald=]'s, mind you) just to up the score.
* DesignatedVillain: The movie makes [=McDonald's=] out to be a villain, even though the protagonist purposefully ignores all health advice, consumes in excess of twice the recommended calories for a sedentary male, and by all accounts actually fudged (or is unwilling to elaborate upon) the pertinent details, possibly up to consuming additional meals (at [=McDonald=]'s, mind you) just to up the score.
to:
* {{Anvilicious}}: While Spurlock does demonstrate Even if you like the dangers of eating too much fast food, the documentary arguably does not demonize fast-food companies or the people who eat their food.
* DesignatedVillain: The movie makes [=McDonald's=] outfilm, it's hard to be a villain, even though the protagonist purposefully ignores all health advice, consumes in excess of twice the recommended calories for a sedentary male, and by all accounts actually fudged (or is unwilling to elaborate upon) the pertinent details, possibly up to consuming additional meals (at [=McDonald=]'s, mind you) just to up the score.argue against this one.
* DesignatedVillain: The movie makes [=McDonald's=] out
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Repair, don\'t respond.
Changed line(s) 8,10 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateImplications: Early in the documentary, he interviews some kids, who instantly recognize one picture--Ronald [=McDonald=]--but most of them can't guess the second one. Spurlock turns that second pic to the camera and *gasp*, it's Jesus Christ! It is possible that maybe the kids weren't raised Christian.
** You'd think non-christians still at least know what Jesus supposedly looks like. And this is the southern states we're talking about so they likely ARE Christian.
** You'd think non-christians still at least know what Jesus supposedly looks like. And this is the southern states we're talking about so they likely ARE Christian.
to:
** You'd think non-christians still at least know what Jesus supposedly looks like. And this is the southern states we're talking about so they likely ARE Christian.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 8 (click to see context) :
* TrueArtSticksItToTheMan
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* StrawmanHasAPoint: While people may disagree with the movie's argument that the blame only on the fast food corporations and not on personal responsibility, the movie does make clear that the actions of said food companies are ''not'' helping the situation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* {{Anvilicious}}: Somewhat averted. While Spurlock does demonstrate the dangers of eating too much fast food, the documentary as a whole does not demonize fast-food companies or the people who eat their food.
to:
* {{Anvilicious}}: Somewhat averted. While Spurlock does demonstrate the dangers of eating too much fast food, the documentary as a whole arguably does not demonize fast-food companies or the people who eat their food.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
to:
**You'd think non-christians still at least know what Jesus supposedly looks like. And this is the southern states we're talking about so they likely ARE Christian.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Natter.
Deleted line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
** He's showing the kind of eating habits people all over America actively do.
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
*** Not to mention the huge hair he found in the parfait.
to:
Changed line(s) 9,12 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateImplications: Early in the documentary, he interviews some kids, who instantly recognize one picture--Ronald [=McDonald=]--but most of them can't guess the second one. Spurlock turns that second pic to the camera and *gasp*, it's Jesus Christ! Um, is it possible that maybe the kids weren't raised Christian?
** Even if they were, there are numerous depictions of Christ so it could have simply been one they weren't familiar with. Even then...what does mascot pop cultural consciousness have to do with weight? It's either UnfortunateImplications or another example of Spurlock's InsaneTrollLogic.
*** It has everything to do with the movie! It shows our kids are growing up knowing more about fast food mascots, thus attracting them to McDonalds more, then they do about Politics or Religion.
** Even if they were, there are numerous depictions of Christ so it could have simply been one they weren't familiar with. Even then...what does mascot pop cultural consciousness have to do with weight? It's either UnfortunateImplications or another example of Spurlock's InsaneTrollLogic.
*** It has everything to do with the movie! It shows our kids are growing up knowing more about fast food mascots, thus attracting them to McDonalds more, then they do about Politics or Religion.
to:
* UnfortunateImplications: Early in the documentary, he interviews some kids, who instantly recognize one picture--Ronald [=McDonald=]--but most of them can't guess the second one. Spurlock turns that second pic to the camera and *gasp*, it's Jesus Christ! Um, It is it possible that maybe the kids weren't raised Christian?
** Even if they were, there are numerous depictions of Christ so it could have simply been one they weren't familiar with. Even then...what does mascot pop cultural consciousness have to do with weight? It's either UnfortunateImplications or another example of Spurlock's InsaneTrollLogic.
*** It has everything to do with the movie! It shows our kids are growing up knowing more about fast food mascots, thus attracting them to McDonalds more, then they do about Politics or Religion.
Christian.
** Even if they were, there are numerous depictions of Christ so it could have simply been one they weren't familiar with. Even then...what does mascot pop cultural consciousness have to do with weight? It's either UnfortunateImplications or another example of Spurlock's InsaneTrollLogic.
*** It has everything to do with the movie! It shows our kids are growing up knowing more about fast food mascots, thus attracting them to McDonalds more, then they do about Politics or Religion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
** He's showing the kind of eating habits people all over America actively do.
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
to:
*** It has everything to do with the movie! It shows our kids are growing up knowing more about fast food mascots, thus attracting them to McDonalds more, then they do about Politics or Religion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* {{Anvilicious}}: Somewhat averted. While Spurlock does demonstrate the dangers of eating too much fast food, the documentary as a whole does not demonize fast-food companies or the people who eat them.
to:
* {{Anvilicious}}: Somewhat averted. While Spurlock does demonstrate the dangers of eating too much fast food, the documentary as a whole does not demonize fast-food companies or the people who eat them.their food.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
this page is ymmv
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* {{Anvilicious}}: Somewhat averted. While Spurlock does demonstrate the dangers of eating too much fast food, the documentary as a whole does not demonize fast-food companies or the people who eat them. YourMileageMayVary, of course
to:
* {{Anvilicious}}: Somewhat averted. While Spurlock does demonstrate the dangers of eating too much fast food, the documentary as a whole does not demonize fast-food companies or the people who eat them. YourMileageMayVary, of course
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* {{Squick}}: Numerous examples, though YourMileageMayVary.
to:
* {{Squick}}: Numerous examples, though YourMileageMayVary.examples.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* DesignatedVillain: The movie makes [=McDonald's[=] out to be a villain, even though the protagonist purposefully ignores all health advice, consumes in excess of twice the recommended calories for a sedentary male, and by all accounts actually fudged (or is unwilling to elaborate upon) the pertinent details, possibly up to consuming additional meals (at [=McDonald=]'s, mind you) just to up the score.
to:
* DesignatedVillain: The movie makes [=McDonald's[=] [=McDonald's=] out to be a villain, even though the protagonist purposefully ignores all health advice, consumes in excess of twice the recommended calories for a sedentary male, and by all accounts actually fudged (or is unwilling to elaborate upon) the pertinent details, possibly up to consuming additional meals (at [=McDonald=]'s, mind you) just to up the score.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* DesignatedVillain: The movie makes [=McDonald's[=] out to be a villain, even though the protagonist purposefully ignores all health advice, consumes in excess of twice the recommended calories for a sedentary male, and by all accounts actually fudged (or is unwilling to elaborate upon) the pertinent details, possibly up to consuming additional meals (at[=McDonald=]'s, mind you) just to up the score.
to:
* DesignatedVillain: The movie makes [=McDonald's[=] out to be a villain, even though the protagonist purposefully ignores all health advice, consumes in excess of twice the recommended calories for a sedentary male, and by all accounts actually fudged (or is unwilling to elaborate upon) the pertinent details, possibly up to consuming additional meals (at[=McDonald=]'s, (at [=McDonald=]'s, mind you) just to up the score.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* DesignatedVillain: The movie makes [=McDonald's[=] out to be a villain, even though the protagonist purposefully ignores all health advice, consumes in excess of twice the recommended calories for a sedentary male, and by all accounts actually fudged (or is unwilling to elaborate upon) the pertinent details, possibly up to consuming additional meals (at McDonald's, mind you) just to up the score.
to:
* DesignatedVillain: The movie makes [=McDonald's[=] out to be a villain, even though the protagonist purposefully ignores all health advice, consumes in excess of twice the recommended calories for a sedentary male, and by all accounts actually fudged (or is unwilling to elaborate upon) the pertinent details, possibly up to consuming additional meals (at McDonald's, (at[=McDonald=]'s, mind you) just to up the score.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* DesignatedVillain: The movie makes [=McDonald's[=] out to be a villain, even though the protagonist purposefully ignores all health advice, consumes in excess of twice the recommended calories for a sedentary male, and by all accounts actually fudged (or is unwilling to elaborate upon) the pertinent details, possibly up to consuming additional meals (at McDonald's, mind you) just to up the score.
Changed line(s) 8,9 (click to see context) from:
** Even if they were, there are numerous depictions of Christ so it could have simply been one they weren't familiar with. Even then... what does mascot pop cultural consciousness have to do with weight? It's either UnfortunateImplications or another example of Spurlock's InsaneTrollLogic.
to:
** Even if they were, there are numerous depictions of Christ so it could have simply been one they weren't familiar with. Even then... what does mascot pop cultural consciousness have to do with weight? It's either UnfortunateImplications or another example of Spurlock's InsaneTrollLogic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
** Even if they were, there are numerous depictions of Christ so it could have simply been one they weren't familiar with. Even then... what does mascot pop cultural consciousness have to do with weight?
to:
** Even if they were, there are numerous depictions of Christ so it could have simply been one they weren't familiar with. Even then... what does mascot pop cultural consciousness have to do with weight?weight? It's either UnfortunateImplications or another example of Spurlock's InsaneTrollLogic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Even if they were, there are numerous depictions of Christ so it could have simply been one they weren't familiar with. Even then... what does mascot pop cultural consciousness have to do with weight?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateImplications: Early in the documentary, he interviews some kids, who instantly recognize one picture--Ronald [=McDonald=]--but most of them can't guess the second one. Spurlock turns that second pic to the camera and *gasp*, it's Jesus Christ! Is it possible that maybe the kids weren't raised Christian?
to:
* UnfortunateImplications: Early in the documentary, he interviews some kids, who instantly recognize one picture--Ronald [=McDonald=]--but most of them can't guess the second one. Spurlock turns that second pic to the camera and *gasp*, it's Jesus Christ! Is Um, is it possible that maybe the kids weren't raised Christian?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* UnfortunateImplications: Early in the documentary, he interviews some kids, who instantly recognize one picture--Ronald [=McDonald=]--but most of them can't guess the second one. Spurlock turns that second pic to the camera and *gasp*, it's Jesus Christ! Is it possible that maybe the kids weren't raised Christian?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
to:
* {{Squick}}: Numerous examples, though YourMileageMayVary.
** Explicit footage of gastric bypass surgery... set to the tune of the "Blue Danube Waltz".
** When Morgan ate his first Super Sized [=McDonald=]'s combo and promptly vomited.
*** Not to mention the huge hair he found in the parfait.