Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / RaidersoftheLostArk

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Why does Colonel Dietrich call Captain Katanga a "savage"? Did he call Katanga that because Dietrich is a xenophobic and racist Nazi like most of his troops, or because he really bought Katanga's lie that he was going to sell Marion into sex slavery and found it too disgusting? Maybe a combination of the two?

to:

** Why does Colonel Dietrich call Captain Katanga a "savage"? Did he call Katanga that because Dietrich is a xenophobic and racist Nazi like most of his troops, or because he really bought Katanga's lie that he was going to sell Marion into sex slavery and found it too disgusting? Maybe There's a combination of good chance it's both at once: the two?Nazis didn't have much problem with employing slave labor themselves (even ignoring the Holocaust, which hadn't happened yet in this film, Sallah complains in the first Cairo scene about the low pay on the Tanis dig and mentions [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghaiing "shanghaiing"]]), but the idea of a white woman being enslaved by a black man raises his hackles.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Reversing prevous formatting edit


** Interestingly, even video boxes that feature the "Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark" logo still refer to the film as simply "Raiders of the Lost Ark" in the verbiage and billing on the back of the box, so although some media and retail outlets do list the movie under the revised title, there's an implication that it's simply a marketing label and that the "real" title of the film remains ''Raiders of the Lost Ark''. With this in mind, it's possible to interpret the revised logo as referring to both the series/character and the film itself, as in "[It's] INDIANA JONES and [this is] the [film known as] RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK."

to:

** Interestingly, even video boxes that feature the "Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark" logo still refer to the film as simply "Raiders of the Lost Ark" in the verbiage and billing on the back of the box, so although some media and retail outlets do list the movie under the revised title, there's an implication that it's simply a marketing label and that the "real" title of the film remains ''Raiders "Raiders of the Lost Ark''. Ark." With this in mind, it's possible to interpret the revised logo as referring to both the series/character and the film itself, as in "[It's] INDIANA JONES and [this is] the [film known as] RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Formatting


** Interestingly, even video boxes that feature the "Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark" logo still refer to the film as simply "Raiders of the Lost Ark" in the verbiage and billing on the back of the box, so although some media and retail outlets do list the movie under the revised title, there's an implication that it's simply a marketing label and that the "real" title of the film remains "Raiders of the Lost Ark." With this in mind, it's possible to interpret the revised logo as referring to both the series/character and the film itself, as in "[It's] INDIANA JONES and [this is] the [film known as] RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK."

to:

** Interestingly, even video boxes that feature the "Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark" logo still refer to the film as simply "Raiders of the Lost Ark" in the verbiage and billing on the back of the box, so although some media and retail outlets do list the movie under the revised title, there's an implication that it's simply a marketing label and that the "real" title of the film remains "Raiders ''Raiders of the Lost Ark." Ark''. With this in mind, it's possible to interpret the revised logo as referring to both the series/character and the film itself, as in "[It's] INDIANA JONES and [this is] the [film known as] RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
New sub-bulletin

Added DiffLines:

** Interestingly, even video boxes that feature the "Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark" logo still refer to the film as simply "Raiders of the Lost Ark" in the verbiage and billing on the back of the box, so although some media and retail outlets do list the movie under the revised title, there's an implication that it's simply a marketing label and that the "real" title of the film remains "Raiders of the Lost Ark." With this in mind, it's possible to interpret the revised logo as referring to both the series/character and the film itself, as in "[It's] INDIANA JONES and [this is] the [film known as] RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Belloq and the Nazis may also count given that Indy is tied up, surrounded by goons, his arch rival has the artefact they were competing for (again) ... and he essentially "wins" simply by closing his eyes as the Ark wipes everyone else out. Of course, this is literally a case of God Himself smiting the villains, so let's face it -- ''anything'' is this trope compared to ''that'' kind of power.

to:

** Belloq and the Nazis may also count given that Indy is tied up, surrounded by goons, his arch rival has the artefact they were competing for (again) ... and he essentially "wins" simply by closing his eyes as the Ark wipes everyone else out. Of course, this is literally a DeusExMachina - a case of God Himself smiting the villains, so let's face it -- ''anything'' is this trope compared to ''that'' kind of power.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:

Added DiffLines:

* AluminumChristmasTrees:
** Modern archaeologists cringe at our hero's antics, tromping over ancient cultural landmarks with the apparent sole intention of stealing valuable artifacts to add to his university's collection[[note]]Modern archaeology places an immense premium on causing as little disturbance to a site as possible, partly out of respect, but also because leaving things alone allows later archaeologists to study a (relatively) pristine site for new information, possibly with newer, more advanced technology that will uncover things they can't, but would be lost if moved or touched[[/note]]. But back in the day, there really was little difference between archaeologists and graverobbers. They were also employed by intelligence services.
** There was a real Nazi organisation that travelled the world looking for ancient artefacts, the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahnenerbe Ahnenerbe]].
** While it did not open until May 1937, the majority of construction was finished on the Golden Gate Bridge in 1936.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** "Bad dates".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Ensuring that link doesn't end up dead.


* OlderThanTheyThink: [[http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/12/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-133/ George Lucas has confirmed]] that the iconic boulder ChaseScene was borrowed from the climax of the Disney comic "The Seven Cities of Cibola" (1954) by Creator/CarlBarks, starring another famous AdventurerArchaeologist Scrooge [=McDuck=].

to:

* OlderThanTheyThink: [[http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/12/13/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-133/ [[https://web.archive.org/web/20221011070222/https://www.cbr.com/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-133/ George Lucas has confirmed]] that the iconic boulder ChaseScene was borrowed from the climax of the Disney comic "The Seven Cities of Cibola" (1954) by Creator/CarlBarks, starring another famous AdventurerArchaeologist Scrooge [=McDuck=].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Most people assume the shifty guy on the plane hiding behind a copy of Life magazine is Toht. He isn't, this guy is actually played by the movie's special effects artist Dennis Muren.

to:

** Most people assume the shifty guy on the plane hiding behind a copy of Life magazine is Toht.Toht, due to being dressed identically and having his face hidden. He isn't, this guy is actually played by the movie's special effects artist Dennis Muren.

Added: 626

Changed: 438

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CommonKnowledge: Creator/GeorgeLucas has been known to use the phrase "pointer scene" on DVDCommentary when comparing an {{Infodump}} in another film to the scene where Jones explains the history of the Ark to the government men. The closest thing to a pointer in the scene is Jones drawing on a blackboard with chalk, but so many parodies of the film include presentation pointers that fans tend to (think they) remember seeing one in the original film.

to:

* CommonKnowledge: CommonKnowledge:
**
Creator/GeorgeLucas has been known to use the phrase "pointer scene" on DVDCommentary when comparing an {{Infodump}} in another film to the scene where Jones explains the history of the Ark to the government men. The closest thing to a pointer in the scene is Jones drawing on a blackboard with chalk, but so many parodies of the film include presentation pointers that fans tend to (think they) remember seeing one in the original film.
** Most people assume the shifty guy on the plane hiding behind a copy of Life magazine is Toht. He isn't, this guy is actually played by the movie's special effects artist Dennis Muren.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Website/TheEditingRoom offers an interesting take on Sallah:
-->'''Karen Allen:''' John, you're okay? Last we saw, the Nazis had you at gunpoint. They just let you go?
-->'''John Rhys-Davies:''' Er, yes. But let's not worry about that. And let's also not worry about how they track down the boat that I'll put you on, later in the movie. Or how they knew that you were in Cairo in the first place. Or how I manage to support a wife and twelve kids doing menial labour. Ha, ha ha.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The movie thinks nothing of Indy going to a foreign country filled with indigenous inhabitants and obtaining a historical relic to be taken back to be exhibited in a Western museum. Again, accurate for the time period and not especially controversial even at the time of filming. But the topic of [[https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/jun/29/should-museums-return-their-colonial-artefacts colonial artifact restitution]] has now become a hotly debated one in the field of archeology. A case could conceivably be made that the Hovitos were within their rights to defend the theft of their idol.

to:

** The movie thinks nothing of Indy going to a foreign country filled with indigenous inhabitants and obtaining a historical relic to be taken back to be exhibited in a Western museum. Again, accurate for the time period and not especially controversial even at the time of filming. But the topic of [[https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/jun/29/should-museums-return-their-colonial-artefacts colonial artifact restitution]] has now become a hotly debated one in the field of archeology. A case could conceivably be made that the Hovitos were within their rights to defend the theft of their idol. Indeed, [[WordOfGod George Lucas]] has actually stated he assumed this would be obvious.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MisaimedFandom: George Lucas has been very clear that Indiana Jones is a {{Antihero}} verging on being a VillainProtagonist with his actions in the opening meant to be outright theft of cultural artifacts. A lot of people missed the point entirely and believed Indiana's "it belongs in a museum" attitude justified his actions completely. ''Raiders of the Lost Ark'' is meant to be a redemption story where Indiana rediscovers things to believe in.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation:

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: AlternativeCharacterInterpretation:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** When Belloq, Dietrich, and Toht are harassed by the locals after the truck chase, Toht is completely still, his back facing away from the camera, and hiding his face. While not obvious at first, it's pretty clear he was replaced by a mannequinn, which makes it even odder since he is clearly shown to be in the car when the camera pans out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Ambiguity Index wick cleaning.


** Is Belloq right in his NotSoDifferent speech, that he's just a shadowy reflection of Indy and that it wouldn't take much for Indy to become exactly like him? We see throughout the series that Indy has some questionable ethics, but he also shows an underlying humanity at times that is probably [[EvilCannotComprehendGood lost on Belloq]].

to:

** Is Belloq right in his NotSoDifferent speech, NotSoDifferentRemark, that he's just a shadowy reflection of Indy and that it wouldn't take much for Indy to become exactly like him? We see throughout the series that Indy has some questionable ethics, but he also shows an underlying humanity at times that is probably [[EvilCannotComprehendGood lost on Belloq]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Is Belloq right in his NotSoDifferent speech, that he's just a shadowy reflection of Indy and that it wouldn't take much for Indy to become exactly like him? We see throughout the series that Indy has some questionable ethics, but he also shows an underlying humanity at times that is probably [[EvilCannotComprehendGood lost on Belloq]].
** AndYouThoughtItWouldFail: Despite having the dream team of Creator/GeorgeLucas and Creator/StevenSpielberg behind the film, it was initially turned down by every studio in Hollywood. Only after much persuasion did Creator/{{Paramount}} agree to do it.

to:

* ** Is Belloq right in his NotSoDifferent speech, that he's just a shadowy reflection of Indy and that it wouldn't take much for Indy to become exactly like him? We see throughout the series that Indy has some questionable ethics, but he also shows an underlying humanity at times that is probably [[EvilCannotComprehendGood lost on Belloq]].
** * AndYouThoughtItWouldFail: Despite having the dream team of Creator/GeorgeLucas and Creator/StevenSpielberg behind the film, it was initially turned down by every studio in Hollywood. Only after much persuasion did Creator/{{Paramount}} agree to do it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AndYouThoughtItWouldFail: Despite having the dream team of Creator/GeorgeLucas and Creator/StevenSpielberg behind the film, it was initially turned down by every studio in Hollywood. Only after much persuasion did Creator/{{Paramount}} agree to do it.

to:

* ** AndYouThoughtItWouldFail: Despite having the dream team of Creator/GeorgeLucas and Creator/StevenSpielberg behind the film, it was initially turned down by every studio in Hollywood. Only after much persuasion did Creator/{{Paramount}} agree to do it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Is Belloq right in his NotSoDifferent speech, that he's just a shadowy reflection of Indy and that it wouldn't take much for Indy to become exactly like him? We see throughout the series that Indy has some questionable ethics, but he also shows an underlying humanity at times that is probably [[EvilCannotComprehendGood lost on Belloq]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: While this movie may seem like a fun action-packed adventure movie for the family, it has some pretty horrific and graphic death sequences. Canada actually gave the film the 14A rating in contrast to the PG the rest of the series got. The MPAA initially was going to give the film an R rating, until Spielberg agreed to make some cuts to the iconic face-melting sequence. The PG-13 rating in the US would not be created until 1984, as a direct reaction to the controversy over this film's [[Film/IndianaJonesAndTheTempleOfDoom sequel]]. If it were released today, ''Raiders'' would almost certainly get a PG-13 (as the two Indy movies after ''Temple of Doom'' did, ironically despite being milder in terms of violence than the first two).

to:

* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: While this movie may seem like a fun action-packed adventure movie for the family, it has some pretty horrific and graphic death sequences. Canada actually gave the film the 14A rating in contrast to the PG the rest of the series got. The MPAA initially was going to give the film an R rating, until Spielberg agreed to make some cuts to the iconic face-melting sequence. The PG-13 rating in the US would not be created until 1984, as a direct reaction to the controversy over this film's [[Film/IndianaJonesAndTheTempleOfDoom sequel]].sequel]], which contained even more gruesome violence than the first film. If it were released today, ''Raiders'' would almost certainly get a PG-13 (as the two Indy movies after ''Temple of Doom'' did, ironically despite being milder in terms of violence than the first two).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: While this movie may seem like a fun action-packed adventure movie for the family, it has some pretty horrific and graphic death sequences. Canada actually gave the film the 14A rating in contrast to the PG the rest of the series got (the PG-13 rating in the US would not be created until this film's [[Film/IndianaJonesAndTheTempleOfDoom sequel]]. If it were released today, ''Raiders'' would probably be rated PG-13 itself).

to:

* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: While this movie may seem like a fun action-packed adventure movie for the family, it has some pretty horrific and graphic death sequences. Canada actually gave the film the 14A rating in contrast to the PG the rest of the series got (the got. The MPAA initially was going to give the film an R rating, until Spielberg agreed to make some cuts to the iconic face-melting sequence. The PG-13 rating in the US would not be created until 1984, as a direct reaction to the controversy over this film's [[Film/IndianaJonesAndTheTempleOfDoom sequel]]. If it were released today, ''Raiders'' would probably be rated almost certainly get a PG-13 itself).
(as the two Indy movies after ''Temple of Doom'' did, ironically despite being milder in terms of violence than the first two).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The movie thinks nothing of Indiana going to a foreign country filled with indigenous inhabitants and obtaining a historical relic to be taken back to be exhibited in a Western museum. Again, accurate for the time period and not especially controversial even at the time of filming. But the topic of [[https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/jun/29/should-museums-return-their-colonial-artefacts colonial artifact restitution]] has now become a hotly debated one in the field of archeology. A case could conceivably be made that the Hovitos were within their rights to defend the theft of their idol.

to:

** The movie thinks nothing of Indiana Indy going to a foreign country filled with indigenous inhabitants and obtaining a historical relic to be taken back to be exhibited in a Western museum. Again, accurate for the time period and not especially controversial even at the time of filming. But the topic of [[https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/jun/29/should-museums-return-their-colonial-artefacts colonial artifact restitution]] has now become a hotly debated one in the field of archeology. A case could conceivably be made that the Hovitos were within their rights to defend the theft of their idol.

Added: 99

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As Indy scrambled to climb out of the pit in the opening sequence, the stone walls are clearly just a tarp placed over something malleable, given the way it visibly moves under his feet.

to:

** As Indy scrambled scrambles to climb out of the pit in the opening sequence, the stone walls are clearly just a tarp placed over something malleable, given the way it visibly moves under his feet.feet.
** Creator/AlfredMolina has clearly been replaced by a dummy when Indy finds Satipo's impaled body.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TearJerker:
** Marion's disappearance and (understandably) assumed death.
** Even though the monkey turned out to be working for the enemy, you can't help but feel a little sorry for it. At least in a AlasPoorVillain kind of way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AcceptableTargets: The villains are well-chosen; no one is shedding many tears to see ThoseWackyNazis get what they deserve.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "Rated PG!" [[labelnote:Explanation]]Because PG-13 wasn't an available rating yet, this film managed to squeak by with a PG rating. The "Rated PG" comment is almost always paired with the surprisingly graphic face-melting shots at the end of the movie.[[/labelnote]]

to:

** "Rated PG!" [[labelnote:Explanation]]Because PG-13 wasn't an available rating yet, this film managed to squeak by with a PG rating.rating with a few alterations. The "Rated PG" comment is almost always paired with the surprisingly graphic face-melting shots at the end of the movie.[[/labelnote]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** "Rated PG!" [[labelnote:Explanation]]Because PG-13 wasn't an available rating yet, this film managed to squeak by with a PG rating. The "Rated PG" comment is almost always paired with the surprisingly graphic face-melting shots at the end of the movie.[[/labelnote]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalResearchFailure: In 1936, Egypt was still a British protectorate. There's no way the British would have allowed a ''massive'' German military presence to be carrying out some secret operation in the country.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* FunnyAneurysmMoment: As Indy speaks with Marcus while packing for his trip, Indy says "You sound just like my mother" as he dismissively speaks of the Ark's powers (which turn out to be very real). In ''Film/IndianaJonesAndTheLastCrusade'', we learn that Indy's mother passed away during his childhood, and his relationship with his father fell apart afterwards. And he grew to hate his father for being so obsessed with the Holy Grail, rather than focusing upon Indy.

to:

* FunnyAneurysmMoment: HarsherInHindsight: As Indy speaks with Marcus while packing for his trip, Indy says "You sound just like my mother" as he dismissively speaks of the Ark's powers (which turn out to be very real). In ''Film/IndianaJonesAndTheLastCrusade'', we learn that Indy's mother passed away during his childhood, and his relationship with his father fell apart afterwards. And he grew to hate his father for being so obsessed with the Holy Grail, rather than focusing upon Indy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "Indy was irrelevant to the story." A common criticism towards the movie is that everything would have played out the way it did even if Indy never got involved in trying to claim the Ark (or ''better'', if the bad guys had opened the Ark in front of Hitler). [[https://collider.com/indiana-jones-doesnt-matter-theory-is-bad/ A rebuttal of this theory can be found here.]]

to:

** The "Indy was irrelevant to the story." story" argument. A common criticism towards the movie (notably popularised by ''Series/TheBigBangTheory'') is that everything would have played out the way it did even if Indy had never got involved in trying to claim the Ark (or ''better'', if the bad guys Nazis had opened taken the Ark to Berlin and opened it in front of Hitler). [[https://collider.com/indiana-jones-doesnt-matter-theory-is-bad/ A rebuttal of this theory can be found here.]]

Top