Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / PrideAndPrejudice

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The 1995 film series became this after ''TheKingsSpeech'', where Jennifer Ehle plays the wife of Edward VI's (Colin Firth) therapist, and her character is shown looking shocked when she first sees the King and Queen in her home.

to:

** The 1995 film series became this after ''TheKingsSpeech'', where Jennifer Ehle plays the wife of Edward George VI's (Colin Firth) therapist, and her character is shown looking shocked when she first sees the King and Queen in her home.

Added: 352

Changed: 118

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: Darcy's and Elizabeth's debate about the dangers and merits of yielding to ''{{persuasion}}'' -- emphasis Elizabeth's.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: HilariousInHindsight:
**
Darcy's and Elizabeth's debate about the dangers and merits of yielding to ''{{persuasion}}'' -- emphasis Elizabeth's.Elizabeth's.
** The 1995 film series became this after ''TheKingsSpeech'', where Jennifer Ehle plays the wife of Edward VI's (Colin Firth) therapist, and her character is shown looking shocked when she first sees the King and Queen in her home.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Part of the reason Mary has such a MisaimedFandom is because of the range of things other characters get down on her for - everything from the truly obnoxious, like her moralizing lectures, to hogging the piano to...[[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking not being interested in balls]]. And this is used as grounds to say she's ''as bad as Lydia and Kitty''. One has to consider, though, that balls were the primary way for young single people in the English countryside to meet and mingle (those in the city had other opportunities), and for girls like the Bennets who would be penniless upon their father's death if they didn't marry well, getting to know men at balls was crucial both for their own welfare and that of their family. So it ''was'' rather presumptuous of Mary not to at least ''make an effort'' to dance and socialize.

to:

** Part of the reason Mary has such a MisaimedFandom is because of the range of things other characters get down on her for - everything from the truly obnoxious, like her moralizing lectures, to hogging the piano to...[[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking not being interested in balls]]. And this is used as grounds to say she's ''as bad as Lydia and Kitty''. One has to consider, though, that balls were the primary way for young single people in the English countryside to meet and mingle (those in the city had other opportunities), and for girls like the Bennets who would be penniless upon their father's death if they didn't marry well, getting to know men at balls was crucial both for their own welfare and that of their family. So it ''was'' rather presumptuous of Mary not to at least ''make an effort'' to dance and socialize. Modern introverted readers who've been mocked for not being partiers tend to read themselves into Mary, and forget how different their situations are.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Mary and the way the novel characterizes her as "just as bad as Lydia and Kitty." While her moralizing lectures are indeed obnoxious, the way other characters get down on her for just being ''not that into dancing and balls'' seems a little like LonersAreFreaks. Back then, of course, a girl's whole future welfare rested on getting a husband, and balls were often the main way for young single people to meet and mingle, so it would have been seen as imprudent and a bit self-absorbed that Mary didn't take husband-hunting more seriously.

to:

** Part of the reason Mary and has such a MisaimedFandom is because of the way the novel characterizes her as "just as bad as Lydia and Kitty." While her moralizing lectures are indeed obnoxious, the way range of things other characters get down on her for just - everything from the truly obnoxious, like her moralizing lectures, to hogging the piano to...[[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking not being ''not interested in balls]]. And this is used as grounds to say she's ''as bad as Lydia and Kitty''. One has to consider, though, that into dancing and balls'' seems a little like LonersAreFreaks. Back then, of course, a girl's whole future welfare rested on getting a husband, and balls were often the main primary way for young single people in the English countryside to meet and mingle, so it mingle (those in the city had other opportunities), and for girls like the Bennets who would have been seen as imprudent and a bit self-absorbed that Mary be penniless upon their father's death if they didn't take husband-hunting more seriously.marry well, getting to know men at balls was crucial both for their own welfare and that of their family. So it ''was'' rather presumptuous of Mary not to at least ''make an effort'' to dance and socialize.

Added: 506

Changed: 618

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MisaimedFandom: "See? [[SlapSlapKiss Deeply rooted dislike is always just a mask for true love]]!" Tell that to Mr. Collins.
** Also, Mary has a lot of fans who like to see her as a disliked nerd when really she's an arrogant KnowNothingKnowItAll, who takes things like her sister ruining herself and the family as times to moralize and give lectures with no empathy or care for the family's problems. (Not to say there isn't anything sympathetic by a plain lonely girl turning to books when everyone focuses on her sister's beauty, but arrogance is a clear and definite fault and it's heavily implied she's not that smart.)

to:

* MisaimedFandom: MisaimedFandom:
**
"See? [[SlapSlapKiss Deeply rooted dislike is always just a mask for true love]]!" Tell that to Mr. Collins.
** Also, Mary has a lot of fans who like to see her as a disliked nerd when really she's an arrogant KnowNothingKnowItAll, who takes things like her sister ruining herself and the family as times to moralize and give lectures with no empathy or care for the family's problems. (Not to say there isn't anything sympathetic by a plain lonely girl turning to books when everyone focuses on her sister's beauty, but arrogance is a clear and definite fault and it's heavily implied she's not that smart.smart anyway.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** That attitude starts with {{Romanticism}}, which was in its early stages by the time Austen was writing. It wasn't mainstream yet, but even Austen has characters who express those feelings, such as Marianne from ''SenseAndSensibility'' (which is all about RomanticismVersusEnlightenment). It also helped that Austen didn't exactly approve of the new Romantic ideals.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Mary and the way the novel characterizes her as "just as bad as Lydia and Kitty." While her moralizing lectures are indeed obnoxious, it's a bit strange as to why her obvious boredom at balls is also seen as imprudent. Obviously, the code of etiquette back then was completely different from what it is now. There's a lot more room today for a girl to be an introvert and [[LonersAreFreaks put books before boys]] than there was in the early 19th century.

to:

** Mary and the way the novel characterizes her as "just as bad as Lydia and Kitty." While her moralizing lectures are indeed obnoxious, it's a bit strange as to why the way other characters get down on her obvious boredom at for just being ''not that into dancing and balls'' seems a little like LonersAreFreaks. Back then, of course, a girl's whole future welfare rested on getting a husband, and balls is also were often the main way for young single people to meet and mingle, so it would have been seen as imprudent. Obviously, the code of etiquette back then was completely different from what it is now. There's imprudent and a lot bit self-absorbed that Mary didn't take husband-hunting more room today for a girl to be an introvert and [[LonersAreFreaks put books before boys]] than there was in the early 19th century.seriously.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Which explains why so many women today are in love with Darcy.

to:

* *** Which explains why so many women today are in love with Darcy.

Added: 522

Changed: 674

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesDissonance: Minor, but interesting -- despite Mr. Darcy instantly standing out as the richest and most handsome man at the ball when he first arrives in Hertfordshire, the ladies quickly lose interest because he's a haughty, brooding loner... which would only serve [[AllGirlsWantBadBoys to augment, rather than diminish, his appeal today]].
** Which explains why so many women today are in love with Darcy.

to:

* ValuesDissonance: ValuesDissonance:
**
Minor, but interesting -- despite Mr. Darcy instantly standing out as the richest and most handsome man at the ball when he first arrives in Hertfordshire, the ladies quickly lose interest because he's a haughty, brooding loner... which would only serve [[AllGirlsWantBadBoys to augment, rather than diminish, his appeal today]].
** * Which explains why so many women today are in love with Darcy.


Added DiffLines:

** Mary and the way the novel characterizes her as "just as bad as Lydia and Kitty." While her moralizing lectures are indeed obnoxious, it's a bit strange as to why her obvious boredom at balls is also seen as imprudent. Obviously, the code of etiquette back then was completely different from what it is now. There's a lot more room today for a girl to be an introvert and [[LonersAreFreaks put books before boys]] than there was in the early 19th century.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TrueArtIsIncomprehensible: Blink and you'll miss it, but during Elizabeth's tour of Pemberly, she gives up on admiring the professional pieces of art in favor of Georgiana's childhood scribbles, "whose subjects were usually more interesting, and also more intelligible." Austen--TheSnarkKnight--strikes again.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: A fair few feminist critiques of the book posit Elizabeth as being just as materialistic as any of the less sympathetic characters by focussing on her feelings for Darcy changing as she visits his magnificent estate. (Considering that, during this retelling, Jane immediately thereafter entreats her to please be serious, these critiques may well be CompletelyMissingThePoint. Or at least the humor.

to:

* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: A fair few feminist critiques of the book posit Elizabeth as being just as materialistic as any of the less sympathetic characters by focussing on her feelings for Darcy changing as she visits his magnificent estate. (Considering that, during this retelling, Jane immediately thereafter entreats her to please be serious, these critiques may well be CompletelyMissingThePoint. Or at least the humor.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: A fair few feminist critiques of the book posit Elizabeth as being just as materialistic as any of the less sympathetic characters by focussing on her feelings for Darcy changing as she visits his magnificent estate.

to:

* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: A fair few feminist critiques of the book posit Elizabeth as being just as materialistic as any of the less sympathetic characters by focussing on her feelings for Darcy changing as she visits his magnificent estate. (Considering that, during this retelling, Jane immediately thereafter entreats her to please be serious, these critiques may well be CompletelyMissingThePoint. Or at least the humor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the same adaptation, Elizabeth (played by Keira Knightley), while far from being considered ugly, is repeatedly said to be less pretty than Jane (played by Rosamund Pike). While Pike is very pretty, there are many who would be hard-pressed to name an actress prettier than Keira Knightley.
** But, Knightley has an idiosyncratic beauty--unlike Pike's rather generic blonde good looks--largely due to her ''[[FridgeBrilliance fine eyes]]''!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Austen wrote in a letter that she personally found the novel "too light, and bright, and ''sparkling''" -- by contrast, a modern author, who loves comparing her [[Literature/{{Twilight}} first book]] to ''Pride and Prejudice'', obviously didn't find it "sparkling" enough...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The American ending features Darcy and Lizzie, newly married and discussing ''pet names''. Darcy jokingly asks if, when he's angry with her, he should call her Mrs Darcy. lizzie responds that he should call her that only when at his happiest, and he responds by kissing her repeatedly, calling her Mrs Darcy between each one.

to:

* ** The American ending features Darcy and Lizzie, newly married and discussing ''pet names''. Darcy jokingly asks if, when he's angry with her, he should call her Mrs Darcy. lizzie Lizzie responds that he should call her that only when at his happiest, and he responds by kissing her repeatedly, calling her Mrs Darcy between each one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The American ending features Darcy and Lizzie, newly married and discussing ''pet names''. Darcy jokingly asks if, when he's angry with her, he should call her Mrs Darcy. lizzie responds that he should call her that only when at his happiest, and he responds by kissing her repeatedly, calling her Mrs Darcy between each one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** YMMV on this one. Considering the author's [[DeadpanSnarker personality]] I find this very hard to believe, Austen would have found a more subtle way if she wanted to write herself in her book. And although the things you said about Jane are true, she is also shy, avoids conflicts and gets her feelings hurt easily.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Although Darcy ''did'' manage to get his own sister away from Wickham. It was just too late for Lydia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Cutting natter


** At least those who weren't forced to read RomeoAndJuliet, which is arguably even ''MORE'' generic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MarySue: The eldest Bennet girl is the most gorgeous girl in town, has the sweetest disposition and is incapable of finding bad in anyone. Her only fault is being too nice. And she happens to share her name with the author of the book...
* MemeticMutation: Lady. Catherine. de Bourgh.


Added DiffLines:

* {{Narm}}: The 2005 film is ripe with it.
** Darcy's first proposal takes place outside in a thunderstorm while rain is pouring down and the actors are screaming at each other.
** Elizabeth stands around looking in a mirror for God knows how long after Darcy's proposal.
** When she spots Darcy at Pemberly Elizabeth gasps dramatically and runs out of the house, rather than just have a conversation with him as she does in the book.
** After rejecting Mr. Collins' proposal Elizabeth runs dramatically out of the house and down to the lake, her mother chasing after her.
** The 1995 mini-series has a few moments as well. Such as Elizabeth's commenting on things she reads in letters and Darcy appearing in her mirror.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HollywoodHomely: In the 2005 version, the plain, bookish Mary is played by ''Talulah Riley''... one of St Trinian's hottest [[FilleFatale Fille Fatales]].
** In the same adaptation, Elizabeth (played by Keira Knightley), while far from being considered ugly, is repeatedly said to be less pretty than Jane (played by Rosamund Pike). While Pike is very pretty, there are many who would be hard-pressed to name an actress prettier than Keira Knightley.
** But, Knightley has an idiosyncratic beauty--unlike Pike's rather generic blonde good looks--largely due to her ''[[FridgeBrilliance fine eyes]]''!
** On the other hand, Charlotte averts this; while she wouldn't crack any mirrors, her face isn't one anyone would reliably call pretty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DullSurprise: Donald Sutherland's performance as Mr Bennet in the 2005 adaptation is so phoned in he may as well have sent the performance as an SMS, especially when compared with Benjamin Whitrow's performance in the 1995 miniseries.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, Mary has a lot of fans who like to see her as a disliked nerd when really she's an arrogant KnowNothingKnowItAll, who takes things like her sister ruining herself and the family as times to moralize and give lectures with no empathy or care for the family's problems. (Not to say there isn't anything sympathetic by a plain lonely girl turning to books when everyone focuses on her sister's beauty, but arrogance is a clear and definite fault and it's heavily implied she's not that smart.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Tropes related to the PC game have been moved to the page for the game


* SpecialEffectFailure: The paper dolls in the PC version. They don't even bother to change their pose most of the time, only their facial expressions. This leads to some gems like Mr. Darcy asking if Elizabeth reads when she's ''holding a book in her off-hand'' or Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth dancing while Elizabeth is holding a book and while Mr. Darcy's hands are hanging by her side.
* UncannyValley: Lydianne in the Matches and Matrimony PC game falls ''right'' into the valley for some odd reason. Which is weird, given that the characters are heavily stylized.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ItWasHisSled: The BBC America trailer for the 1995 miniseries ''starts'' by showing the wedding and stating "We know how it ends..."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** A couple people heard about it (or became aware of its plot) through the game, although part of it might have been because Aglefumph, who LetsPlay'd it twice has a lot of followers.


Added DiffLines:

** At least those who weren't forced to read RomeoAndJuliet, which is arguably even ''MORE'' generic.
* SpecialEffectFailure: The paper dolls in the PC version. They don't even bother to change their pose most of the time, only their facial expressions. This leads to some gems like Mr. Darcy asking if Elizabeth reads when she's ''holding a book in her off-hand'' or Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth dancing while Elizabeth is holding a book and while Mr. Darcy's hands are hanging by her side.
* UncannyValley: Lydianne in the Matches and Matrimony PC game falls ''right'' into the valley for some odd reason. Which is weird, given that the characters are heavily stylized.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Austen wrote in a letter that she personally found the novel "too light, and bright, and ''sparkling''" -- by contrast, a modern author, who loves comparing her [[{{Twilight}} first book]] to ''Pride and Prejudice'', obviously didn't find it "sparkling" enough...

to:

** Austen wrote in a letter that she personally found the novel "too light, and bright, and ''sparkling''" -- by contrast, a modern author, who loves comparing her [[{{Twilight}} [[Literature/{{Twilight}} first book]] to ''Pride and Prejudice'', obviously didn't find it "sparkling" enough...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: A fair few feminist critiques of the book posit Elizabeth as being just as materialistic as any of the less sympathetic characters by focussing on her feelings for Darcy changing as she visits his magnificent estate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DullSurprise: Donald Sutherland's performance as Mr Bennet in the 2005 adaptation is so phoned in he may as well have sent the performance as an SMS, especially when compared with Benjamin Whitrow's performance in the 1995 miniseries.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SeinfeldIsUnfunny: Part of the reason it has such a bad reputation; many high schoolers are forced to read the most generic and archetypical romantic comedy of them all...except it's the UrExample or at least the TropeCodifier

Top